What are you working on? v19

[esalaka]

The absence of a comma does not change the meaning of that sentence, it merely makes it incomprehensible unless you assume the comma is implied.

[editline]14th August 2011[/editline]

Ie fuck commas real men use no punctuation at all

[Wingar]

[QUOTE=esalaka;31724779]The absence of a comma does not change the meaning of that sentence, it merely makes it incomprehensible unless you assume the comma is implied.

[editline]14th August 2011[/editline]

Ie fuck commas real men use no punctuation at all[/QUOTE]
The lack of a comma fucked over what I thought it meant, I thought it meant that no version of VirtualBox fully supported EFI.

[esalaka]

I always thought there's only one VirtualBox but I guess you could think of each version as a separate one :v:

[CarlBooth]

I think you're just nit picking

[Overv]

[QUOTE=CarlBooth;31724513]Yeah, it runs natively on VirtualBox

Only a [url=http://pastebin.com/C3YUD8b9]slight config change[/url] is needed in the machine XML file, no changes to OS X required.

I even used a Retail DVD from my Macbook.[/QUOTE]

Why have I never read about this config change in any of the guides I read? Suddenly everything works perfectly fine.

[esalaka]

[QUOTE=Overv;31725009]Why have I never read about this config change in any of the guides I read? Suddenly everything works perfectly fine.[/QUOTE]

youre supposed to be a wwizard if you read them prob'ly

[editline]14th August 2011[/editline]

Okay, fuck this, I'll just get back to proper grammar. I'm not even proving a point.

[CarlBooth]

[QUOTE=Overv;31725009]Why have I never read about this config change in any of the guides I read? Suddenly everything works perfectly fine.[/QUOTE]

Apple allow OS X Server to be virtualised, it will install without any changes.

I think that line just adds an emulation for a check OS X Client makes to see if it is licensed to run or not.

[Wingar]

[QUOTE=CarlBooth;31725035]Apple allow OS X Server to be virtualised, it will install without any changes.

I think that line just adds an emulation for a check OS X Client makes to see if it is licensed to run or not.[/QUOTE]
If I'm not mistaken that key just allows DSMOS to run, DSMOS stands for "Don't Steal Mac OS". Basically it stops OSX running on non Mac hardware.

[esalaka]

[QUOTE=wingless;31725088]If I'm not mistaken that key just allows DSMOS to run, DSMOS stands for "Don't Steal Mac OS". Basically it stops OSX running on non Mac hardware.[/QUOTE]

I wonder what SmcDeviceKey means. What's the Smc stand for?

[Wingar]

[QUOTE=esalaka;31725112]I wonder what SmcDeviceKey means. What's the Smc stand for?[/QUOTE]
System Management Controller.

[esalaka]

[QUOTE=wingless;31725128]System Management Controller.[/QUOTE]

So is it a separate chip on Macs or something?

[editline]14th August 2011[/editline]

Because sounds like it's the piece of hardware used to restrict usage to only Apple-produced platforms

[CarlBooth]

[QUOTE=esalaka;31725156]So is it a separate chip on Macs or something?

[editline]14th August 2011[/editline]

Because sounds like it's the piece of hardware used to restrict usage to only Apple-produced platforms[/QUOTE]

Yeah but it controls all the fans and all sorts of shit.

It's like a little ROM.

[neos300]

Sorry if I'm a little late, but the OpenGL context creation tutorial works fine on Code::Blocks on windows.
You just need to create a new OpenGL project, for some reason creating an empty project and linking liopengl32.a gives linker errors.

[thf]

-snip-

[naelstrof]

[QUOTE=Robbis_1;31722908]What is that? A cube of cubes? Or is it just lots of cubes on the same position?[/QUOTE]

They are actually GL_POINTS, 2d dots rendered in 3d space. It gives some interesting pictures and is fairly fast at rendering.

[q3k]

Overv, you might want to remind that these apt-get commands are for Debian and Debian-based distributions only. Fedora users will have to use yum..., Arch users will have to use pacman (although the development libraries are installed automatically with xorg and mesa/libgl), and Gentoo users can go fuck themselves.

[b]edit[/b]: Also, "gl/glext.h" and "gl/glxext.h" should be <GL/glext.h> and <GL/glxext.h> respectively, if you're installing them in /usr/include (and you shouldn't).

[Overv]

[QUOTE=q3k;31725747]Overv, you might want to remind that these apt-get commands are for Debian and Debian-based distributions only. Fedora users will have to use yum..., Arch users will have to use pacman (although the development libraries are installed automatically with xorg and mesa/libgl), and Gentoo users can go fuck themselves.

[b]edit[/b]: Also, "gl/glext.h" and "gl/glxext.h" should be <GL/glext.h> and <GL/glxext.h> respectively, if you're installing them in /usr/include (and you shouldn't).[/QUOTE]

And that's why I'm not using angle brackets. I assume Linux developers know that, it's part of the prior C++ experience.

[q3k]

[QUOTE=Overv;31725807]And that's why I'm not using angle brackets. I assume Linux developers know that, it's part of the prior C++ experience.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I guess you're right.

Also, your example code works well for me. Are you sure you want people to use Code::Blocks instead of their favourite text editor and a Makefile (either created manually, it's not that hard, using CMake, or gods forbid using autotools)?

[thf]

[QUOTE=q3k;31725747]Overv, you might want to remind that these apt-get commands are for Debian and Debian-based distributions only. Fedora users will have to use yum..., Arch users will have to use pacman (although the development libraries are installed automatically with xorg and mesa/libgl), and Gentoo users can go fuck themselves.

[b]edit[/b]: Also, "gl/glext.h" and "gl/glxext.h" should be <GL/glext.h> and <GL/glxext.h> respectively, if you're installing them in /usr/include (and you shouldn't).[/QUOTE]

I don't know much about programming on Linux, so I'm wondering why you shouldn't install them there?

[naelstrof]

Arch automatically installs them there if you install from the repositiories. I too wonder why you shouldn't install them in /usr/include as i have them located there?

[Overv]

[QUOTE=q3k;31725859]Yeah, I guess you're right.

Also, your example code works well for me. Are you sure you want people to use Code::Blocks instead of their favourite text editor and a Makefile (either created manually, it's not that hard, using CMake, or gods forbid using autotools)?[/QUOTE]

I don't recall using Code::Blocks anywhere? I specified the arguments to compile your code with GCC, so you are free to use anything you want to edit and build your project.

[q3k]

[QUOTE=thf;31725892]I don't know much about programming on Linux, so I'm wondering why you shouldn't install them there?[/QUOTE]

Because it's a system path, and your package manager might complain, some apps depending on an older versions of these files might break... You should either install there headers in /usr/local/include, or just keep them local to your current project. The same goes for all software that isn't managed by your package manager, it should always go to /usr/local instead of /usr, or updates might collide with your custom files.

[esalaka]

[QUOTE=Naelstrom;31725908]Arch automatically installs them there if you install from the repositiories. I too wonder why you shouldn't install them in /usr/include as i have them located there?[/QUOTE]

You shouldn't count on them being there, I s'pose.

[q3k]

[QUOTE=Overv;31725917]I don't recall using Code::Blocks anywhere? I specified the arguments to compile your code with GCC, so you are free to use anything you want to edit and build your project.[/QUOTE]
In your "full source code" file:
[cpp]/// Describe Code::Blocks setup and how to compile with g++[/cpp]

[editline]14th August 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=esalaka;31725928]You shouldn't count on them being there, I s'pose.[/QUOTE]
They might not be the most recent version available. Well, maybe not on Arch but on other distributions.

[Overv]

[QUOTE=q3k;31725935]In your "full source code" file:
[cpp]/// Describe Code::Blocks setup and how to compile with g++[/cpp][/QUOTE]

That shouldn't be in the source code on the site, sorry :v:.

[Maurice]

Development is slow so have a video of me dicking around in 1-1!
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtcGiZelPfk[/media]

Outsmarting enemies is fun.

[Xeon06]

[QUOTE=Maurice;31726031]Development is slow so have a video of me dicking around in 1-1!
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtcGiZelPfk[/media]

Outsmarting enemies is fun.[/QUOTE]

Whenever you release it, I'll send it to tons of gaming websites and make you famous.

[esalaka]

[QUOTE=Maurice;31726031]Development is slow so have a video of me dicking around in 1-1!
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtcGiZelPfk[/media]

Outsmarting enemies is fun.[/QUOTE]

Cool.

(What happened to your avatar :ohdear:)

[Darwin226]

So I have this 2D rendering library thing and it can do stuff with OpenGL. I decided to try and add 3D functionality to it. It was surprisingly easy.
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/35032740/ZScreen/Oooh_3D%21-2011-08-14_17.06.55.png[/img]
The cube rotates. This is the code used:
[csharp]using FireflyGL;

namespace Oooh3D
{
static class Program
{
static Cube cube;

static void Main()
{
Firefly.OnUpdate += delegate
{
cube.Yaw = Firefly.ElapsedMilliseconds / 1000F;
cube.Roll = Firefly.ElapsedMilliseconds / 1000F;
};
Firefly.Initialize(800, 500, "Oooh 3D!", (x, y) => OnLoad());
}

static void OnLoad()
{
cube = new Cube();
cube.FrontTopLeft.G = 0;
cube.FrontTopLeft.B = 0;
cube.FrontTopRight.R = 0;
cube.FrontTopRight.B = 0;
cube.FrontBottomRight.R = 0;
cube.FrontBottomRight.G = 0;
cube.FrontBottomLeft.B = 0;

cube.BackTopRight.B = 0;
cube.BackTopLeft.R = 0;
cube.BackTopLeft.G = 0;
cube.BackBottomRight.B = 0;
cube.BackBottomRight.G = 0;
cube.BackBottomLeft.B = 0;
cube.BackBottomLeft.R = 0;

cube.Z -= 5F;

var test = new Label("Hello\nThis is text rendered on the scene\nusing orthogonal projection over the \ncube that's rendered in 3D", new System.Drawing.Font("Impact", 18), System.Drawing.Brushes.Green)
{
X = 400,
Y = 300
};
}
}
}
[/csharp]

[q3k]

[QUOTE=esalaka;31726194](What happened to your avatar :ohdear:)[/QUOTE]
It became 20% cooler.