[QUOTE=voodooattack;35788033]Best waterfall there is, and a logical one at that.
And I agree, this argument has gone on long enough, no more derail from me.[/QUOTE]
Waterfall is dumb
On a side note, please tell me your "company" is not genuinely called Ninja. Go away and rethink that now, before you look like a group of 11 year olds.
Brands people, they're not that hard.
I for one would definitely give this a try and, if it worked smoothly and didn't impede my coding in any way, I'd probably consider using it more often. I very much enjoy the idea of being able to easily customise my IDE, for themes and plugins and so on.
[QUOTE=TrueNash;35793326]On a side note, please tell me your "company" is not genuinely called Ninja. Go away and rethink that now, before you look like a group of 11 year olds.
Brands people, they're not that hard.[/QUOTE]
Don't be hatin'. Does it really bug you that much?
[QUOTE=CountNoobula;35797223]Don't be hatin'. Does it really bug you that much?[/QUOTE]
Not just TrueNash,
anyone with a sense of taste.
[QUOTE=TM Gmod;35798632]Not just TrueNash,
anyone with a sense of hate.[/QUOTE]
fixed
Whether or not a company name is ridiculous depends entirely on that company's success, and the professionalism of the people who work under that name; a more "serious" name, like Microware Technology Solutions, is STILL going to sound sadly hilarious if all the people are 12 year olds and constantly talk about how their super-secret product is going to crash the stock market or something.
Software companies often have silly/weird/funny/stupid names, but no one even pauses to think about that if the company is making the owners rich.
If I cared more, I go compile a list of highly successful companies with "bad" names, but I don't so I won't
[QUOTE=TrueNash;35793326]On a side note, please tell me your "company" is not genuinely called Ninja. Go away and rethink that now, before you look like a group of 11 year olds.
Brands people, they're not that hard.[/QUOTE]
You say this on the [i]Facepunch Studios[/i] forums.
[QUOTE=ROBO_DONUT;35799492]You say this on the [i]Facepunch Studios[/i] forums.[/QUOTE]
Zynga!
I have no problems with silly, funny or weird names, but have some originality and style please. The cliche is so thick with Ninja, it's very tacky.
[editline]3rd May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=ryandaniels;35799434]
If I cared more, I go compile a list of highly successful companies with "bad" names, but I don't so I won't[/QUOTE]Please, no more compiled lists, we're still waiting on the last one...
Real-time collaboration, really? NASA didn't even need to collaborate in real-time to screw the pooch on that rover mission. Maybe pun intended.
[QUOTE=ahdge;35808431]Real-time collaboration, really? NASA didn't even need to collaborate in real-time to screw the pooch on that rover mission. Maybe pun intended.[/QUOTE]
Well, nasa wrote the code for several of their missions entirely in asm - lets use asm for everything because nothing else has any use clearly
You do know that you can think for yourself, right? Just because NASA does something doesn't mean it is [b]the[/b] best solution. I for one would love a realtime coding IDE so i can teach my friends to program in a non frustrating manner
[QUOTE=Icedshot;35809002]You do know that you can think for yourself, right?[/QUOTE]
And then,
[QUOTE=Icedshot;35809002]I for one would love a realtime coding IDE so i can teach my friends to program in a non frustrating manner[/QUOTE]
That's just too ironic. At any rate, I was referring to the link below.
[URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Surveyor_'98_program[/URL]
[QUOTE=ahdge;35809223]And then,
That's just too ironic. At any rate, I was referring to the link below.
[URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Surveyor_'98_program[/URL][/QUOTE]
Oh right. I take back my comment then (apologies), but yours is still pretty much entirely irrelevant to this thread
Not entirely. What really happened is one team wrote code using one unit of measurement and another team didn't convert theirs to match. To me, anything real-time would just increase chances of complications similar to this, or at least outweigh any productive aspect it has to offer. I don't claim to know what's actually going on in this IDE though.
In general, software dev. really isn't like any form of engineering :\
In software, it's usually better to prototype, get feedback, and fix what actually needs fixing afterwards than to try to predict and control every step of the way.
At least in my inexperienced opinion.
Not to be a bother, but how's that list doing? Is there an estimated time of release for it?
[QUOTE=Jookia;35810815]Not to be a bother, but how's that list doing? Is there an estimated time of release for it?[/QUOTE]
Also waiting for ETA of list, highly interested!
[QUOTE=Jookia;35810815]Not to be a bother, but how's that list doing? Is there an estimated time of release for it?[/QUOTE]
Really?
[QUOTE=ahdge;35809390]Not entirely. What really happened is one team wrote code using one unit of measurement and another team didn't convert theirs to match. To me, anything real-time would just increase chances of complications similar to this, or at least outweigh any productive aspect it has to offer. I don't claim to know what's actually going on in this IDE though.[/QUOTE]
Do you lack any sense of perspective?
[QUOTE=voodooattack;35814650]Really?[/QUOTE]
What? They said they're compiling a list, it is relevant to my interests.
[QUOTE=Jookia;35816548]What? They said they're compiling a list, it is relevant to my interests.[/QUOTE]
Then your interests are really vain, you know.
[QUOTE=voodooattack;35817170]Then your interests are really vain, you know.[/QUOTE]
You don't want to know how most IDEs are badly designed?
[QUOTE=Jookia;35817517]You don't want to know how most IDEs are badly designed?[/QUOTE]
Please, shut up.
[QUOTE=WTF Nuke;35817566]Please, shut up.[/QUOTE]
I was promised a list full of descriptions of why the industry's editors are badly designed. These are editors that were built by teams of programmers working around the clock, and sold for thousands of dollars. It's kind of disappointing not where they went wrong, considering they've been through years of revisions and rewrites. I'll shut up now, or at least until a list appears.
[QUOTE=Jookia;35817629]I was promised a list full of descriptions of why the industry's editors are badly designed. These are editors that were built by teams of programmers working around the clock, and sold for thousands of dollars. It's kind of disappointing not where they went wrong, considering they've been through years of revisions and rewrites. I'll shut up now, or at least until a list appears.[/QUOTE]
In the 'industry', programmers don't design anything, they're merely pawns at the hand of the software designer team (who do the SRA and come up with a specification and a project plan), who are in turn the slaves of the marketing department, and those bastards stick their noses in everything, bickering about this and that and ruining everything good both teams come up with.
Here you go, your explanation for bad IDE (and more like, software) design in a nutshell, because the marketing people are morons who sacrifice useful features in favour of anything stupid and useless they consider to be a selling point, all to meet stupid deadlines and other marketing bullshit.
Are we done here?
If I could find a good theme for this, I'd definitely be willing to try it. I am a little worried about how well it would work on Linux with poor graphics acceleration.
[QUOTE=voodooattack;35817845]In the 'industry', programmers don't design anything, they're merely pawns at the hand of the software designer team (who do the SRA and come up with a specification and a project plan), who are in turn the slaves of the marketing department, and those bastards stick their noses in everything, bickering about this and that and ruining everything good both teams come up with.
Here you go, your explanation for bad IDE (and more like, software) design in a nutshell, because the marketing people are morons who sacrifice useful features in favour of anything stupid and useless they consider to be a selling point, all to meet stupid deadlines and other marketing bullshit.
Are we done here?[/QUOTE]
I don't mean how as the verb, how as the adjective.
[QUOTE=Jookia;35817998]I don't mean how as the verb, how as the adjective.[/QUOTE]
how about how the fuck why are you so insistent dude
Thread has gone to shit because Jookia can't take normal arguments and accept that people have opinions.
I like the IDE though, if it has great integration with whatever shell the user is using, support for vi/vim keys and possibly a git plugin too, I'd buy it.
It looks really great, imho.
[editline]4th May 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=calzoneman;35817886]If I could find a good theme for this, I'd definitely be willing to try it. I am a little worried about how well it would work on Linux with poor graphics acceleration.[/QUOTE]
With Valve working together with AMD to get their driver support up on Linux, hopefully this won't be much of a problem in the coming future.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
