What are you working on? December 2011 Edition

[Yogurt]

I dare someone to change every author's name to "PROBLEM?"

[Wingar]

[QUOTE=horsedrowner;33857061]I love Super Meat Boy, but the internet levels suck anyway. I'd say nothing of value would be lost :v:

I wish I had content, though. I've got plenty of experience in C# but nothing with XNA whatsoever. I kinda wanna start doing game development too, but I never know what to do.[/QUOTE]

I'm telling you man, Pong. Make it.

[supersnail11]

Wow, the Kongregate community makes me proud.
[quote]Worse than fail...flagged.[/quote]
According to the kongregate rules of submission, a game is classified as such as long as it has interaction.

I.E. Typing

Kongregate users don't get creepy games.

[Lexic]

[QUOTE=supersnail11;33857767]Wow, the Kongregate community makes me proud.

According to the kongregate rules of submission, a game is classified as such as long as it has interaction.

I.E. Typing

Kongregate users don't get creepy games.[/QUOTE]

5*'d, fav'd, review'd.
You might want to include the story as an intro to the game, so people know what's going on.

[Parad0x0217]

[QUOTE=Yogurt;33857525]I dare someone to change every author's name to "PROBLEM?"[/QUOTE]

Done.

[img]http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/5627/83703938.png[/img]

[hypershadsy]

The default .NET console is stupid slow, and I like using XNA, so I thought why not combine them.
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21571661/Pictures/xna_console.png[/img]
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21571661/Pictures/xna_console2.png[/img]
You can still use ConsoleColor if you want

[editline]23rd December 2011[/editline]

[QUOTE=Parad0x0217;33857879]Done.[/QUOTE]

Someone confirm

[zenby]

[QUOTE=Hypershadsy;33857919]The default .NET console is stupid slow, and I like using XNA, so I thought why not combine them.
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21571661/Pictures/xna_console.png[/img]
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21571661/Pictures/xna_console2.png[/img]
You can still use ConsoleColor if you want

[editline]23rd December 2011[/editline]

Someone confirm[/QUOTE]

Confirmed, featured chapters are by anonymous, featured levels are by "problem?"

[garry]

[QUOTE=Richy19;33854222]managed to get premake working, but is there anyway to set the directory that the makefiles created by premake build to?[/QUOTE]

As in.. where the exe files end up going? [url]http://industriousone.com/targetdir[/url]

[supersnail11]

Added a link to the original in the game, and a notice that it is, in fact, supposed to crash.

[Lily]

I think the worst about OS development is when it doesnt work properly, not even gets past the bootloader, on another emulator/real hardware
If it wasent for AMD SimNow I would probably never have figured out that some BIOSes leave ds at a random value when jumping into the MBR

Now it just deadlocks on SimNow though
Fuck

[Blade]

Always so thrown off when my code works the first try. Switched from using appinit_dlls to using a codecave. So now LoL can run without LoLNotes running. Also removes the installing headache(aside from the certificates). Code makes me cringe though.

[csharp]byte[] connectcc = new byte[]
{
0x55, //PUSH EBP
0x8B, 0xEC, //MOV EBP, ESP
0x60, //PUSHAD
0x8B, 0x45, 0x0C, //MOV EAX, [EBP+C]
0x66, 0x83, 0x38, 0x02, //CMP WORD PTR [EAX], 2
0x75, 0x12, //JNZ SHORT 12h
0xB9, 0x08, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, //MOV ECX, 3308
0x66, 0x39, 0x48, 0x02, //CMP [EAX+2], CX
0x75, 0x07, //JNZ SHORT 7h
0xC7, 0x40, 0x04, 0x7F, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, //MOV DWORD PTR [EAX+4], 100007Fh
0x61, //POPAD
0xE9, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 //JMP LONG <X>
};

protected void CheckLoop()
{
while (CheckThread != null)
{
if (CurrentProcess == null || CurrentProcess.HasExited)
{
CurrentProcess = Process.GetProcessesByName(ProcessName).FirstOrDefault();
if (CurrentProcess != null)
{
Inject();
}
}
Thread.Sleep(500);
}
}

void Inject()
{
using (var mem = new ProcessMemory(CurrentProcess.Id))
{
using (var notemem = new ProcessMemory(Process.GetCurrentProcess().Id))
{
var connect = new byte[connectcc.Length];
connectcc.CopyTo(connect, 0);
int jmpaddrloc = connect.Length - 4;

Int32 addr = mem.Alloc(connectcc.Length);

var mod = GetModule(Process.GetCurrentProcess().Modules, "ws2_32.dll");
Int32 reladdr = notemem.GetAddress(mod.BaseAddress.ToInt32(), "connect");
reladdr -= mod.BaseAddress.ToInt32();

var lolmod = GetModule(CurrentProcess.Modules, "ws2_32.dll");
Int32 connectaddr = lolmod.BaseAddress.ToInt32() + reladdr;

BitConverter.GetBytes((connectaddr + 5) - (addr + connect.Length)).CopyTo(connect, jmpaddrloc);
mem.Write(addr, connect);

var jmp = new byte[5];
jmp[0] = 0xE9;
BitConverter.GetBytes(addr - (connectaddr + 5)).CopyTo(jmp, 1);
mem.Write(connectaddr, jmp);
}
}
}[/csharp]

[robmaister12]

wouldn't you want all the Int32s to be IntPtrs? On a 64-bit system they would technically be Int64s and IntPtr automatically picks the right one for the system.

[Blade]

[QUOTE=robmaister12;33858303]wouldn't you want all the Int32s to be IntPtrs? On a 64-bit system they would technically be Int64s and IntPtr automatically picks the right one for the system.[/QUOTE]

Well the target is built for x86 and I don't know x64 assembly so I couldn't support it even if I wanted to :(.

[robmaister12]

you just have to use IntPtr, the runtime will handle it all for you. And I'm just talking about these lines that reference memory addresses:

[csharp]Int32 addr = mem.Alloc(connectcc.Length);[/csharp]

should be

[csharp]IntPtr addr = mem.Alloc(conectcc.Length);[/csharp]

etc.

[Blade]

[QUOTE=robmaister12;33858375]you just have to use IntPtr, the runtime will handle it all for you. And I'm just talking about these lines that reference memory addresses:

[csharp]Int32 addr = mem.Alloc(connectcc.Length);[/csharp]

should be

[csharp]IntPtr addr = mem.Alloc(conectcc.Length);[/csharp]

etc.[/QUOTE]

The assembly code wont work in a x64 bit process either way though. So it doesn't really matter.

[Jookia]

[QUOTE=wingless;33857515]Dumped fine for me, It's 106MB total.[/QUOTE]

Okay so can you archive that in case of.. Well.. What that dude did above?

[robmaister12]

either way works, I've just seen IntPtr used in every example that deals with pointers in managed code. And C# creates a 64-bit process when supported, as long as you're compiling with /platform:anycpu

[Lexic]

[QUOTE=high;33858390]The assembly code wont work in a x64 bit process either way though. So it doesn't really matter.[/QUOTE]

x86_64 is backwards compatible with i386.

[Wingar]

[QUOTE=Jookia;33858476]Okay so can you archive that in case of.. Well.. What that dude did above?[/QUOTE]

[url=http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7273219/smb_editor.7z]Done[/url]

[Jookia]

[url=http://supermeatboy.com/forum/index.php/topic,2259.0.html]Oh no.[/url]

[reevezy67]

[QUOTE=Jookia;33859141][url=http://supermeatboy.com/forum/index.php/topic,2259.0.html]Oh no.[/url][/QUOTE]

Hell of a first post.

[Jookia]

[QUOTE=reevezy67;33859393]Hell of a first post.[/QUOTE]

Hopefully my last post there too.

[Lily]

I have a sudden urge to fuck with the SMB DB now :v:

[editline]23rd December 2011[/editline]

Oh wow, someone cleared out all level/chapter names

[swift and shift]

Oh well.

I warned them several times via Twitter and email, and each time I was met with indifferrence.

[voodooattack]

You guys are mean.

[Jookia]

[QUOTE=voodooattack;33859908]You guys are mean.[/QUOTE]

Hey man, what's better? White hats doing this shit (including backing up the database), or black hats not revealing the vulnerability?

[Lily]

[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/649874715362141917/5DCA7D6541DAE39DE5663A48B4D0AA5A959B91E9/[/img]

As someone cleared out all level names, I dont think they mind me adding some text to the page that is not - :v:

[sambooo]

The devs shouldn't have been so lazy, they got exactly what they deserved

[voodooattack]

[QUOTE=Jookia;33859951]Hey man, what's better? White hats doing this shit (including backing up the database), or black hats not revealing the vulnerability?[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I was just fishing for disagrees.

I'm actually quite surprised by how mature you're all acting. Is this still facepunch? :tinfoil:

[reevezy67]

[QUOTE=voodooattack;33860017]Yeah, I was just fishing for disagrees.

I'm actually quite surprised by how mature you're all acting. Is this still facepunch? :tinfoil:[/QUOTE]

Check out fast threads.