Looks pretty nice, perhaps the gradient at the top is a little too dark? Might just be me.
[QUOTE=Adzter;32972538]Looks pretty nice, perhaps the gradient at the top is a little too dark? Might just be me.[/QUOTE]
That shadow at the top adds some depth to the page, as shown here:
[img]http://puu.sh/7Bvf[/img]
That shadow might make the gradient look bad. Dunno if I should keep the shadow :tinfoil:
[img]http://puu.sh/7Bvp[/img]
It does look better without it though.
[QUOTE=RusselG;32972568]That shadow at the top adds some depth to the page, as shown here:
[img]http://puu.sh/7Bvf[/img]
That shadow might make the gradient look bad. Dunno if I should keep the shadow :tinfoil:
[img]http://puu.sh/7Bvp[/img]
It does look better without it though.[/QUOTE]
The shadow only looks decent when you've scrolled down the page, as shown in your second picture. Also, is it just me or is your logo really blurry?
[QUOTE=adamjon858;32965905]Seriously, I'm about ready to start a deathtosilkicons.com[/QUOTE]
Please do.
[QUOTE=twenty;32972931]The shadow only looks decent when you've scrolled down the page, as shown in your second picture. Also, is it just me or is your logo really blurry?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, the logo has a blur as well.
[img]http://puu.sh/7BCn[/img]
Better?
[QUOTE=RusselG;32973137]Yeah, the logo has a blur as well.
[img]http://puu.sh/7BCn[/img]
Better?[/QUOTE]
It was better with a feint shadow.
[QUOTE=twenty;32973288]It was better with a feint shadow.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://puu.sh/7BG0[/img]
God this might be annoying.
Also, need some javascript help. I'm trying to make a script that shows the blur if the header isn't visible, or the page is scrolled up 55px.
I have no idea how to do this, any pointers?
You could z-index the header above the shadow, dunno if that's a good idea but as far as I know it'd work.
[QUOTE=Weiss;32973492]You could z-index the header above the shadow, dunno if that's a good idea but as far as I know it'd work.[/QUOTE]If the shadow is applied on, say, the body element, he can't just apply a z-index on the header which is contained in the body and expect it to get over the body. Plus it'd look weird to see the shadow pop up by scrolling past the header.
[QUOTE=RusselG;32973419][img]http://puu.sh/7BG0[/img]
God this might be annoying.
Also, need some javascript help. I'm trying to make a script that shows the blur if the header isn't visible, or the page is scrolled up 55px.
I have no idea how to do this, any pointers?[/QUOTE]
I was talking about the header its self, not the logo :v:. Sorry
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32973625]If the shadow is applied on, say, the body element, he can't just apply a z-index on the header which is contained in the body and expect it to get over the body. Plus it'd look weird to see the shadow pop up by scrolling past the header.[/QUOTE]
It used to be applied to body with a :before selector, but since then I have moved it to a seperate div. It would look weird, but it adds a nice effect. The bad thing is it makes the header look odd, in my opinion. Maybe I can do without the shadow.
[editline]ff[/editline]
[QUOTE=twenty;32973636]I was talking about the header its self, not the logo :v:. Sorry[/QUOTE]
Oh. :tinfoil:
The login button is way too plain also!
Getting down and dirty with facebook-style UI design today :D
Who's interested in 50$ Amazon AWS coupon? I have no use for it and it expires on the 30th.
[QUOTE=RusselG;32973419][img]http://puu.sh/7BG0[/img]
God this might be annoying.
Also, need some javascript help. I'm trying to make a script that shows the blur if the header isn't visible, or the page is scrolled up 55px.
I have no idea how to do this, any pointers?[/QUOTE]
make it an image
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;32974094]Who's interested in 50$ Amazon AWS coupon? I have no use for it and it expires on the 30th.[/QUOTE]
Ill take that off your hands :p
Last issue before the website is complete and ready to be sent to the client, and this bug/glitch/bastard thing keeps happening.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZbhIq.png[/IMG]
Ignore the dodgy number 2, only a placeholder!
[QUOTE=Kwaq;32974734]make it an image[/QUOTE]
How will that help?
Thanks for the advice on font size and line spacing, Tera.
It looks much better than before.
[quote][img]http://content.screencast.com/users/Kopimi/folders/Jing/media/6d849f5f-ec0d-4b2c-ac6a-79f536ad0272/2011-10-26_2058.png[/img][/quote]
[QUOTE=RusselG;32980931]How will that help?[/QUOTE]
Because it'll look the same regardless of what browser the person is using. You wont get the blurriness unless you want it.
This is what happens when you don't use tables for email design:
[img]http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/300264_10150915824085441_532530440_21572178_1655070985_n.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=RusselG;32980931]How will that help?[/QUOTE]
it will make you look less autistic and its more efficient
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32989799]This is what happens when you don't use tables for email design:
[img]http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/300264_10150915824085441_532530440_21572178_1655070985_n.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]How what why
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32990005]How what why[/QUOTE]
Email clients don't like floated divs, or CSS that isn't inline.
And that's in hotmail, which is light years ahead of gmail.
Just use tables and images. Sorted.
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32990076]
And that's in hotmail, which is light years ahead of gmail.[/QUOTE]
what are you talking about, hotmail is total shit
[QUOTE=anton;32990564]what are you talking about, hotmail is total shit[/QUOTE]
When it comes to rendering emails, it's better than gmail.
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32990076]Email clients don't like floated divs, or CSS that isn't inline.
[b]And that's in hotmail, which is light years ahead of gmail.[/b][/QUOTE]Hahaha, you're joking, right?
[QUOTE=TehWhale;32990937]Hahaha, you're joking, right?[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/[/url]
Hotmail has much better CSS handling.
More proof:
[url]http://www.email-standards.org/clients/windows-live-hotmail/[/url]
[url]http://www.email-standards.org/clients/gmail/[/url]
CSS isn't even in the original Email spec.
Google follows protocol
[QUOTE=adamjon858;32991431]CSS isn't even in the original Email spec.
Google follows protocol[/QUOTE]
Link to the spec?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
