• What are you working on? v6
    4,671 replies, posted
[QUOTE=spidersdesign;31154809]That requires a js parser - I shouldn't have to compile my CSS.[/QUOTE] Use Rails 3.1 and forget you need to compile JavaScript, CoffeeScript, CSS, SCSS and SASS into a single stylesheet and JavaScript file :v:
i uh, open the page in chrome and play around with the CSS with chrome's dev tools. is that bad?
Well, thats my first time on this section Im "working" on a website for a friend of mine, its a website for a Massage Shop They want red color for a relaxing mood, well... I think the overall website its ok, but I really need to work on the content stuff Please give your opinions [url]http://brunobsb.hd1.com.br/Entretempos/indexScroll.html[/url]
[QUOTE=BrunoBsB;31166208]Well, thats my first time on this section Im "working" on a website for a friend of mine, its a website for a Massage Shop They want red color for a relaxing mood, well... I think the overall website its ok, but I really need to work on the content stuff Please give your opinions [url]http://brunobsb.hd1.com.br/Entretempos/indexScroll.html[/url][/QUOTE] i dunno if its just my ipod, but I don't like how the gradient just stops.
[QUOTE=BrunoBsB;31166208]Well, thats my first time on this section Im "working" on a website for a friend of mine, its a website for a Massage Shop They want red color for a relaxing mood, well... I think the overall website its ok, but I really need to work on the content stuff Please give your opinions [url]http://brunobsb.hd1.com.br/Entretempos/indexScroll.html[/url][/QUOTE] The red for the menu circles is way to bright, there needs to be more padding on the sections and preferablly a different font and background color (maybe #eee?).
You people remember [url=http://www.facepunch.com/members/323328-Jessecar96]jessecar96[/url], right? Well I was taking a look at [url=http://scams.jessecar96.net/]his site[/url] and well [B]Warning[/B]: mysql_query() [[B]function.mysql-query[/B]]: Unable to save result set in [B]/homepages/1/d355560359/htdocs/net/beta/dblist.php[/B] on line [B]8[/B] Warning: mysql_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in [B]/homepages/1/d355560359/htdocs/net/beta/dblist.php[/B] on line [B]9[/B] not to mention he was taking a shot at a tf2 server scanner coded in JS (don't ask), and wanted to store data on the client computer. [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11275736/s/haha.png[/img] I gave him a class to use that used PDO but he stuck with the native mysql_* commands.
You can't store objects in localStorage, only strings. You can use either JSON.stringify() and JSON.parse(), or you can use implementations of WebDB and IndexedDB, but these are newer, and there are conflicts on the standards.
[QUOTE=deadeye5362;31169547]You can't store objects in localStorage, only strings. You can use either JSON.stringify() and JSON.parse(), or you can use implementations of WebDB and IndexedDB, but these are newer, and there are conflicts on the standards.[/QUOTE] Yeah I know what he's doing wrong with that [editline]17th July 2011[/editline] he's trying to duplicate something I made with it
[QUOTE=Alcapwne;31160774]Okay I've almost finished my new redesign: [url]www.clickphilia.com/taimur/index.html[/url] Thanks[/QUOTE] You might want to center it as it seems its all pushed to one side. Theres also the issue that the bottom of the main content including the Odd Works box doesn't show. Otherwise it's looking really nice.
[QUOTE=RELAXiN;31170226]You might want to center it as it seems its all pushed to one side. Theres also the issue that the bottom of the main content including the Odd Works box doesn't show. Otherwise it's looking really nice.[/QUOTE] There isn't a second paragraph for most of the things so I don't think that's a problem what resolution are you viewing at, just out of interest? I've tailored it to 1280x1024 in Opera but I guess I will need to center everything then
I think it looks dodgy on my screen 1440x900 [quote][img]http://s.hzy.im/0592.jpg[/img][/quote]
[QUOTE=H4Z3Y;31170975]I think it looks dodgy on my screen 1440x900[/QUOTE] Yeah a few people complained that their screens weren't tall enough, so I've done a re-redesign: [url]http://clickphilia.com/taimur/index2.html[/url] is that better? [editline]17th July 2011[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZtiArl.jpg[/IMG]
yeah, that's much better [quote][img]http://s.hzy.im/0593.jpg[/img][/quote] I would consider moving the lighter coloured bar to the right hand side, the left feels very cluttered. Also I can't even tell what the bar is for... I use [url="http://code.google.com/p/zscreen/"]ZScreen[/url] and it uploads it straight to my ftp server, although it can also upload to imgur, photobucket, etc
[QUOTE=H4Z3Y;31171240]yeah, that's much better I would consider moving the lighter coloured bar to the right hand side, the left feels very cluttered. Also I can't even tell what the bar is for... I use [url="http://code.google.com/p/zscreen/"]ZScreen[/url] and it uploads it straight to my ftp server, although it can also upload to imgur, photobucket, etc[/QUOTE] Ok, I'll try that out, thanks :) The lighter bar is for my logo and contact details which I'll add later also, zscreen looks great, I'll check it out [editline]17th July 2011[/editline] I think it looks very odd with the bar on the right hand side, do you think it would be better if I put the pictures in the left column and then the showcase thing in the right column?
I think everything just needs more spacing, each of the three columns could easily be pushed further apart with plenty of room to spare. What I don't like is how a third of the screen is just left blank, that's why people have center wraps, it splits that 'nothing' and puts it on either side, making it more acceptable.
[QUOTE=H4Z3Y;31171314]I think everything just needs more spacing, each of the three columns could easily be pushed further apart with plenty of room to spare. What I don't like is how a third of the screen is just left blank, that's why people have center wraps, it splits that 'nothing' and puts it on either side, making it more acceptable.[/QUOTE] ah okay, I'll try that out
How can I check for css3 compatibility without JS? I have an element the has some nice css3 animations on it. Usually the CSS3 animations I use just make something look nicer so that if the browser can't render them then it's no biggy, but this time its static state (with no animations applied) has to be different depending on whether CSS3 animations can be applied. The reason behind this is that the element in question's job is to display messages to the user. With the css3 animations it displays one then fades out and back in again with another (changes the padding to change message). In the interest of not causing old computers (with modern browsers) to become slightly sluggish the animations are only applied when the setting for which the messages are referring to is being hovered over (so only one message box has the animations at any one time). My problem is this: On an old browser I need to condense all of the messages into the space (I can do that fine) and then expand them when the actual message element is hovered over. On a modern browser that doesn't have the setting hovered over (so the animations aren't applied) I can afford to only display one message (with one of those apple thingies that they have on ios devices to show how many and which home screen you're on to show how many messages there are) as I know that the others will be displayed on hover. At the moment I have the styles to make it only display one wrapped up in its own css3 animation keyframe (as that isn't applied by an old browser) but although that works fine it seems sloppy and a bad way of doing it. What I'm trying to do is define styles that older browsers *can* render (height, width etc.) in a way that only modern browsers *will* render them. Wrapping them in a CSS3 keyframe is one way of doing it but I was wondering if there was a neater way.
[img]http://k.min.us/jbXoO0.PNG[/img] too much noise for a title bar?
[QUOTE=toaster468;31174024][img]http://k.min.us/jbXoO0.PNG[/img] too much noise for a title bar?[/QUOTE] Not in my opinion.
[QUOTE=toaster468;31174024][img]http://k.min.us/jbXoO0.PNG[/img] too much noise for a title bar?[/QUOTE] It's completely out of context when we can't see the rest of the design at all so how are we supposed to comment on that? lol
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;31174647]It's completely out of context when we can't see the rest of the design at all so how are we supposed to comment on that? lol[/QUOTE] I agree - I replied because I don't think that level of noise would be too noisy on any design
Writing a new language that sits on top of php and is geared towards web-development, as an exercise. [code]use 'debug' use 'db' with {'host' : 'localhost', 'user' : 'root', 'pass' : '', 'dbname' : 'test'} def valid_token token:str < :bool !db.query 'SELECT * FROM tokens WHERE key=?' [token] end str token = io.get 'token' if not token :: 'no token provided! :(' end if not valid_token token :: 'token "%{token}" is not valid!' exit end io.write json { 'foo' : 'bar', 'lol' : 'hi' } io.send 200 exit[/code] Modules are written in PHP, obviously, and can be given parameters during the actual inclusion call ([b]use[/b]...[b]with[/b]). It's strongly typed, object-oriented, has native json support, etc. Bootstrap scripts look something like this: [php]<?php /** * WHY bootstrap example * @version 1 * @author Filipe Dobreira */ require 'why/engine.php'; why\engine::run( 'testapp/app.why', array( 'config' => array( 'env' => 'dev', 'log.enable' => true, 'errors.display' => true ) ) ); [/php] Unhandled exceptions actually propagate all the way up to PHP, and can be handled at that point without reaching the client. There's also native docblock support with a pretty simple api: [code]#@author Filipe Dobreira #@description THIS FUNCTION SHOOTS PONIES def my_function io.write 'what this function does: %{this.doc.description}' io.send 200 end[/code] And no, I don't plan to ever actually use this in any serious manner, and yes, it's missing a lot of features and is flimsy as hell right now.
[img]http://k.min.us/ieeZby.png[/img] Can you see the gradient in the back ground and is there too much noise?
[QUOTE=toaster468;31179337][img]http://k.min.us/ieeZby.png[/img] Can you see the gradient in the back ground and is there too much noise?[/QUOTE] the noise looks a bit more like jpeg rape than classy pattern
[QUOTE=toaster468;31179337][img]http://k.min.us/ieeZby.png[/img] Can you see the gradient in the back ground and is there too much noise?[/QUOTE] The two pixel separator looks completely off in terms of colors as does the "logo".
[QUOTE=Alcapwne;31179692]the noise looks a bit more like jpeg rape than classy pattern[/QUOTE] I used How do I change the design? I am working from a tutorial for Photoshop [editline]17th July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Jelly;31179737]The two pixel separator looks completely off in terms of colors as does the "logo".[/QUOTE] What color should I use?
[QUOTE=toaster468;31179867]What color should I use?[/QUOTE] You've got a light grey to the left which only really works for more darker designs, you could try a lighter blue.
[QUOTE=Jelly;31179980]You've got a light grey to the left which only really works for more darker designs, you could try a lighter blue.[/QUOTE] Light blue for the logo? Or for the back ground? I already have a sort of light blue color on my website [url=toaster468.com]toaster468.com[/url]
[QUOTE=toaster468;31180023]Light blue for the logo? Or for the back ground?[/QUOTE] For the left of the seperator.
[QUOTE=Alcapwne;31171324]ah okay, I'll try that out[/QUOTE] I just noticed that clicking on a logo that has a smaller descriptive text will leave the previous ones there. Theres also the box with showcase in it not wrapping around everything below it. [IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/29169308/Screen/oddworks.png[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.