[QUOTE=RusselG;33147388][url]http://summerglaufc.org/gmod/[/url]
Well, it's nearly finished. Ignore the shitposts, the server stopped accepting POST requests and we were testing.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://gabrielecirulli.com/p/20111106-101955.png[/img]
[QUOTE=RusselG;33147388][url]http://summerglaufc.org/gmod/[/url]
Well, it's nearly finished. Ignore the shitposts, the server stopped accepting POST requests and we were testing.[/QUOTE]
i dont think you sanitised it correctly somehow
Sorry, I couldn't help myself with the redirect.
[editline]a[/editline]
party poopers
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;33139976]I forgot i was using html5 :v:
not gonna use something that I barely know.
[editline]5th November 2011[/editline]
[url]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6380033/test.html[/url]
this reminds me of how i hate ie.
I don't want to use pictures :tinfoil:
[editline]5th November 2011[/editline]
WTF my browser isn't ie9?? its ie7????
[t]http://i.imgur.com/KuAGS.png[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/R4HZK.png[/t]
Does IE suck or what[/QUOTE]
If you forgot to add a DOCTYPE to the top of your HTML file, Internet Explorer assumes (for compatibility reasons) you're writing out of date HTML and therefore renders the page using the IE7/8 engine and renders a border around the page ([url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/08/23/making-sites-look-their-best-in-standards-mode.aspx]IEBlog post on the situation[/url])
Fixing 99% of all IE9 issues is as easy as putting <!DOCTYPE html> at the top. Which you should be doing anyway.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;33147606][img]http://gabrielecirulli.com/p/20111106-101955.png[/img][/QUOTE]
Thanks. I forgot to put htmlentities back in. :v:
[editline]aa[/editline]
[img]http://puu.sh/8crB[/img]
awwww, thanks tera!
[img]http://puu.sh/8crK[/img]
love you too jelly
[QUOTE=RusselG;33147704]Thanks. I forgot to put htmlentities back in. :v:
[editline]aa[/editline]
[img]http://puu.sh/8crB[/img]
awwww, thanks tera!
[img]http://puu.sh/8crK[/img]
love you too jelly[/QUOTE]By the way Jelly crashed your site. And redirected it to meatspin.
You should show the parts where I redirected it to meatspin.
[QUOTE=Jelly;33147747]You should show the parts where I redirected it to meatspin.[/QUOTE]
fuck im too lazy to work on antispam.
Adding htmlentities back in.
[QUOTE=RusselG;33147765]fuck im too lazy to work on antispam.
Adding htmlentities back in.[/QUOTE]No let us play some more
Just a quick something.
[img]http://i.jaybuz.me/2011110614403716.png[/img]
too much travel broacher?
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33150272]Just a quick something.
[img]http://i.jaybuz.me/2011110614403716.png[/img]
too much travel broacher?[/QUOTE]
I feel like the whole fanatical thing has been done too much, logo looks fine though.
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33150272]Just a quick something.
[img]http://i.jaybuz.me/2011110614403716.png[/img]
too much travel broacher?[/QUOTE]
what does a sun have to do with this at all
[QUOTE=pepsi cola;33150991]what does a sun have to do with this at all[/QUOTE]
It's not suppose to be a sun but I guess that's what it makes people think.
Bright themes?
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33150272]Just a quick something.
[img]http://i.jaybuz.me/2011110614403716.png[/img]
too much travel broacher?[/QUOTE]
Not sure how the star/sun fits into it but looks nice.
Okay fussy people. How about icy themes!
[img]http://i.jaybuz.me/20111106163228361.png[/img]
sad themes? :(
[QUOTE=Dotmister;33147670]If you forgot to add a DOCTYPE to the top of your HTML file, Internet Explorer assumes (for compatibility reasons) you're writing out of date HTML and therefore renders the page using the IE7/8 engine and renders a border around the page ([url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/08/23/making-sites-look-their-best-in-standards-mode.aspx]IEBlog post on the situation[/url])
Fixing 99% of all IE9 issues is as easy as putting <!DOCTYPE html> at the top. Which you should be doing anyway.[/QUOTE]
There is doctype. Take a look at the code in the pictures.
I'm done.
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33151555]I'm done.[/QUOTE]
what why? i'm not trying to be a dick or anything but i'm pretty sure a glyph is supposed to slightly relate to the text next to it.
i mean, if you added some color to that paint drop it'd make more sense.
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;33151532]There is doctype. Take a look at the code in the pictures.[/QUOTE]
DOCTYPE's are case-sensitive.
[QUOTE=pepsi cola;33151628]what why? i'm not trying to be a dick or anything but i'm pretty sure a glyph is supposed to slightly relate to the text next to it.
i mean, if you added some color to that paint drop it'd make more sense.[/QUOTE]
I changed it anyway but I do like the idea of different colours on it. Might try it later but I'm done for now.
Thanks (for hurting my feeling).
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33151662]I changed it anyway but I do like the idea of different colours on it. Might try it later but I'm done for now.
Thanks (for hurting my feeling).[/QUOTE]\
i'm sorry bby :( i love you
[QUOTE=Dotmister;33151655]DOCTYPE's are case-sensitive.[/QUOTE]
I don't think so, at least in HTML5. html5boilerplate uses a lower-case version.
[editline]6th November 2011[/editline]
The snow flake can represent complexity in a simple form!
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33151696]I don't think so, at least in HTML5. html5boilerplate uses a lower-case version.
[editline]6th November 2011[/editline]
The snow flake can represent complexity in a simple form![/QUOTE]Who do you think could figure that out? An icon should represent what the thing does, so in this case, themes.
[QUOTE=jaybuz;33151696]
The snow flake can represent complexity in a simple form![/QUOTE]
no offense but that's fucking retarded
[QUOTE=Jelly;33145376]Concurrently developing an independent desktop and mobile version of a site would be a pain in the ass.[/QUOTE]
It's suprisingly not that bad, as long as you keep everything layed out verticaly.
However, once you start creating forms it's hard to get them good looking on a phone and desktop at the same time.
This is a mock-up for a project me and hzy are working on.
I've received arguments in regarding the fact that the sidebar is on the right clashing with the normal reading direction (rtl) assumed in many other designs which feature sidebars.
Personally, to me the layout doesn't appear confusing at all. There's a clear visual separation between the content area and the sidebar (which basically hosts navigation and tools in one place), and I think an user would get accustomed to such a layout without any problems after the first experience. A tutorial could also help soften the impact it might have on new users.
[img]http://gabrielecirulli.com/p/20111106-194756.png[/img]
What do you think? Please be verbose in your arguments, I'd like to know the exact reasons as to why you believe something should be done differently.
I think Logout shouldn't be in the middle of the menu, as there should be something more important. I would put it under Reset.
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;33139976]I forgot i was using html5 :v:
not gonna use something that I barely know.
[editline]5th November 2011[/editline]
[url]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6380033/test.html[/url]
this reminds me of how i hate ie.
I don't want to use pictures :tinfoil:
[editline]5th November 2011[/editline]
WTF my browser isn't ie9?? its ie7????
[t]http://i.imgur.com/KuAGS.png[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/R4HZK.png[/t]
Does IE suck or what[/QUOTE]
My Bad, DOCTYPE's aren't case sensitive. It's just that dropbox.com is listed on the Compatibility View list, either because they still serve up old IE7 code when someone on IE9 goes to their site or just because there are so many incorrect HTML pages hosted on dropbox.
[img]http://www.adamncasey.co.uk/upload/image/3558/d/o/[/img]
If you either move to your own hosting (advisable anyway) or put <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=9" > in your <head> tag.
[QUOTE=commander204;33153734]I think Logout shouldn't be in the middle of the menu, as there should be something more important. I would put it under Reset.[/QUOTE]
the stuff between the username and the grey line above dashboard collapse down via that triangle next to the username.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
