• What are you working on? v6
    4,671 replies, posted
[QUOTE=q3k;33511767]I thought this was just a web developer urban legend. [img]http://i.imgur.com/1JDEI.png[/img] Dear gods. :suicide:[/QUOTE] I get 3 of these emails a week...there's way too many crazies out there lol
[url]http://ezyimg.info[/url] I'm still working on it, can't register or login yet ( that's simple to do though ). However when someone registers it creates a subdomain, for e.g. name.ezyimg.info Any C&C is appreciated.
[QUOTE=kragmars102;33517892][url]http://ezyimg.info[/url] I'm still working on it, can't register or login yet ( that's simple to do though ). However when someone registers it creates a subdomain, for e.g. name.ezyimg.info Any C&C is appreciated.[/QUOTE] Looks good! I personally think a little bit more whitespace wouldn't hurt, but that's your call. Might wanna see what other people think about that too. Good work so far.
[QUOTE=kragmars102;33517892][url]http://ezyimg.info[/url] I'm still working on it, can't register or login yet ( that's simple to do though ). However when someone registers it creates a subdomain, for e.g. name.ezyimg.info Any C&C is appreciated.[/QUOTE] I think that it would be good as a 'compressed' style, just like gmail does when you shrink the window maybe you could detect window size and add padding after a certain size?
That's a really good idea, I'll check into it. thanks.
[QUOTE=adamjon858;33512581]I get 3 of these emails a week...there's way too many crazies out there lol[/QUOTE] What do you answer?
Hey guys - can anyone give me some tips on setting up this server? I'm running Debian 6 32-bit on it with Apache 2.2, and I want to get Ruby on Rails with PostgreSQL. I've managed to get Debian working. I've got Apache working. I even have Ruby and Rails semi-sorta working. But then I spent four fucking hours to get fucking nowhere with PostgreSQL. I was considering just clearing the disk and starting from scratch but I doubt that'd be much help :(((
One thing I heard is that you should use nginx or lighttpd instead of apache on linux machines, but I don't know much more than that.
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1439918/Pics/2011-12-01_0936.png[/img] What's up with your odd widths? It'd look better if the notification width was the same as everything else
And the big white box might look better the same height as the upload box imo. [editline]1st December 2011[/editline] Actually, the upload box changes height so I'm not sure
Anyone here got blogs up? Just decided to get [url=http://geoffballington.com]Geoff Ballington[/url] up and could use some link exchanges, let me know if you're interested. Also if you run an active and popular tech/design blog I'd be happy to guest post on it. In terms of what I'm working on website-wise, I'm working on most of the things you see featured on [url=http://tranquilo.co.uk]Tranquilo[/url] primarily [url=http://luxuryabroad.com]Luxury Abroad[/url] as that is the project I am actively managing.
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9791791/yay.png[/img] (I'm very new to this, so keep that in mind) Finished replacing all of the navigation rollover buttons in my webpage to CSS. Cut out about 12 images in the process :v: Now working on drop down menus.
[QUOTE=TehWhale;33520952][img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1439918/Pics/2011-12-01_0936.png[/img] What's up with your odd widths? It'd look better if the notification width was the same as everything else[/QUOTE] So many colours :/ [QUOTE=SCopE5000;33523414]Anyone here got blogs up? Just decided to get [url=http://geoffballington.com]Geoff Ballington[/url] up and could use some link exchanges, let me know if you're interested. Also if you run an active and popular tech/design blog I'd be happy to guest post on it. In terms of what I'm working on website-wise, I'm working on most of the things you see featured on [url=http://tranquilo.co.uk]Tranquilo[/url] primarily [url=http://luxuryabroad.com]Luxury Abroad[/url] as that is the project I am actively managing.[/QUOTE] Personal blog, but nothing I'd want anyone guest posting on. Why are you looking for a link exchange anyway? It's not a very good way to link build. Guest posts are though :) In other news, bad shit going on at work :(
[quote]What's up with your odd widths? It'd look better if the notification width was the same as everything else[/quote] Will fix that, thanks for picking it up. [quote]So many colours :/[/quote] I might cut down on the color use, maby turn the green field button blue as well
Not waywo but p3ni5.com is available if you guys are into making gay porn sites. [editline]2nd December 2011[/editline] as of 12/1/2011 7:53pm central
[img]http://ezyimg.info/cdn/M9YLLWKP.jpg[/img] There's a few things that still needs fixing.
[QUOTE=mechanarchy;33520480]Hey guys - can anyone give me some tips on setting up this server? I'm running Debian 6 32-bit on it with Apache 2.2, and I want to get Ruby on Rails with PostgreSQL. I've managed to get Debian working. I've got Apache working. I even have Ruby and Rails semi-sorta working. But then I spent four fucking hours to get fucking nowhere with PostgreSQL. I was considering just clearing the disk and starting from scratch but I doubt that'd be much help :((([/QUOTE] Use nginx with passenger, and make sure you're compiling ruby from source. [b]Don't[/b] use the repo version
[QUOTE=swift and shift;33534384]Use nginx with passenger, and make sure you're compiling ruby from source. [b]Don't[/b] use the repo version[/QUOTE] Well, it's working now. I got Apache2 + Ruby + Rails + Passenger set up, and my friend managed to coerce PostgreSQL/8.4.9 into working somehow. I'm using the Debian 6 repo versions of Apache/2.2.16 and Ruby/1.8.7r302 and Rails/3.0.9, but you're unable to get Passenger working without compiling it yourself it seems so that's what I've done. Why is using a non-self-compiled build of Ruby bad?
[QUOTE=mechanarchy;33534456]Well, it's working now. I got Apache2 + Ruby + Rails + Passenger set up, and my friend managed to coerce PostgreSQL/8.4.9 into working somehow. I'm using the Debian 6 repo versions of Apache/2.2.16 and Ruby/1.8.7r302 and Rails/3.0.9, but you're unable to get Passenger working without compiling it yourself it seems so that's what I've done. Why is using a non-self-compiled build of Ruby bad?[/QUOTE] Because the Debian versions of anything are horrifically out of date. The latest ruby is 1.9.3-p0 which was released on October 31. I'm not sure on the release date of 1.8.7-p302, but 1.8.7-p0 was released in 2008. Anyhow, 1.8.7 is slow and has no proper Unicode support, among other things. Nobody uses 1.8 unless they're forced to. Debian [i]also[/i] like to hijack rubygems so you're discouraged from upgrading any of their packages unless they say so, so you're in trouble if you ever want to update rubygems (run gem -v, and tell me what you get) You should really be compiling ruby yourself. [url=http://beginrescueend.com/rvm/install/]Use RVM[/url] because it's cool and manages Ruby versions and environments for you (eg. when I'm at work doing some stuff for a codebase that's stuck on 1.8.7, I can just run `rvm 1.8.7` and use 1.8.7. For everything else I can do `rvm 1.9.3` and get 1.9.3 back). [editline]2nd December 2011[/editline] Rails is also planning on dropping support for 1.8.7 soon anyway (btw, did you know you're running on an old rails version too? :p)
[QUOTE=swift and shift;33534534]Because the Debian versions of anything are horrifically out of date. The latest ruby is 1.9.3-p0 which was released on October 31. I'm not sure on the release date of 1.8.7-p302, but 1.8.7-p0 was released in 2008. Anyhow, 1.8.7 is slow and has no proper Unicode support, among other things. Nobody uses 1.8 unless they're forced to. Debian [i]also[/i] like to hijack rubygems so you're discouraged from upgrading any of their packages unless they say so, so you're in trouble if you ever want to update rubygems (run gem -v, and tell me what you get) You should really be compiling ruby yourself. [url=http://beginrescueend.com/rvm/install/]Use RVM[/url] because it's cool and manages Ruby versions and environments for you (eg. when I'm at work doing some stuff for a codebase that's stuck on 1.8.7, I can just run `rvm 1.8.7` and use 1.8.7. For everything else I can do `rvm 1.9.3` and get 1.9.3 back). [editline]2nd December 2011[/editline] Rails is also planning on dropping support for 1.8.7 soon anyway (btw, did you know you're running on an old rails version too? :p)[/QUOTE] I guess it's a good thing this sort of stuff is pointed out BEFORE I do anything with the site. So what's the benefit of nginx over apache2? Any comments on PostgreSQL? :/
[QUOTE=mechanarchy;33534628]So what's the benefit of nginx over apache2?[/quote] Faster, lighter (although you're using rails so that doesn't even matter LOL), and imo the configuration syntax is cleaner and nicer [quote]Any comments on PostgreSQL? :/[/QUOTE] There's a lot of those HN hipsters who like pgsql, but mysql's never failed me. Use what you like.
[QUOTE=swift and shift;33534669]Faster, lighter (although you're using rails so that doesn't even matter LOL), and imo the configuration syntax is cleaner and nicer There's a lot of those HN hipsters who like pgsql, but mysql's never failed me. Use what you like.[/QUOTE] I would be using MySQL because I'm familiar with it and have used it heaps with PHP in the past, though my friend suggested pgsql given Oracle owns MySQL and they have a tendency to ruin everything.
[QUOTE=mechanarchy;33534694]I would be using MySQL because I'm familiar with it and have used it heaps with PHP in the past, though my friend suggested pgsql given Oracle owns MySQL and they have a tendency to ruin everything.[/QUOTE] If you're that worried, just use MariaDB, which is a fork of MySQL and attempts to be 100% compatible with MySQL code.
Hi guys I just did some magic [url]http://www.gabrielecirulli.com/stuff/stripe/[/url]
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;33537536]Hi guys I just did some magic [url]http://www.gabrielecirulli.com/stuff/stripe/[/url][/QUOTE] MY EYE. it's tricking me.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;33537536]Hi guys I just did some magic [url]http://www.gabrielecirulli.com/stuff/stripe/[/url][/QUOTE] this shit be fucked up yo I can't determine what the purpose of it is, but it's fucked up in every possible way
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;33537633]this shit be fucked up yo I can't determine what the purpose of it is, but it's fucked up in every possible way[/QUOTE] I just wanted to determine whether my idea of how websites like [url]http://lamoulade.com[/url] are done was right or not.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;33537656]I just wanted to determine whether my idea of how websites like [url]http://lamoulade.com[/url] are done was right or not.[/QUOTE] wow and there was me thinking [url=http://what.bitcanvas.co.uk]my idea[/url] was overcomplicated :v:
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;33537718]wow and there was me thinking [url=http://what.bitcanvas.co.uk]my idea[/url] was overcomplicated :v:[/QUOTE] What's that website? It doesn't load.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;33538119]What's that website? It doesn't load.[/QUOTE] idk fuck no-ip.com edit: also fuck me, here: [url]http://dev.meteornet.net/[/url]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.