[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32182690]If the [b]protocol[/b] says that you have to delete every single file the server can't just do whatever it wants. After all when you press delete it's the client which goes into each folder and deletes all files one at a time, the server just executes.[/QUOTE]
He's saying the File Transfer [b]Protocol[/b] is stupid, not that current clients are doing it wrong.
Ok, I've been told that the school can't pay me for my work, and even if my work was to be published it'd be published alongside (and not in replacement of) the current (awful) page, and to be honest I'm not too keen on that.
What should I do?
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32183327]Ok, I've been told that the school can't pay me for my work, and even if my work was to be published it'd be published alongside (and not in replacement of) the current (awful) page, and to be honest I'm not too keen on that.
What should I do?[/QUOTE]
NVM was someone else.
Ugh... where is Tangara?
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32183327]Ok, I've been told that the school can't pay me for my work, and even if my work was to be published it'd be published alongside (and not in replacement of) the current (awful) page, and to be honest I'm not too keen on that.
What should I do?[/QUOTE]
Not give it to them? I wouldn't at least.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32183327]Ok, I've been told that the school can't pay me for my work, and even if my work was to be published it'd be published alongside (and not in replacement of) the current (awful) page, and to be honest I'm not too keen on that.
What should I do?[/QUOTE]
I dunno, seems kinda douchey to not give them the photos
I think you should do it because it's extra experience etc. and the school will probably reward you some way or the other
[url]http://oct.vc/threadtest/threadtest.html[/url]
Could I have some design advice? So far I know that the header noise and the green bar are kind of eyesores. But I don't really know what to do next.
my poor 1280x1024
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1439918/Pics/Screenshot-2011-09-08_20.26.06.png[/img]
...yeah i just realized that totally bones anyone below 1680x1050 derp
[QUOTE=JWJ;32189091][url]http://www.lethaldrive.com/newsite/[/url]
ehuehueuheu[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/uWARI.png[/img]
[editline]9th September 2011[/editline]
ninja'd?
[editline]fake[/editline]
Zscreen is nice. :v:
[QUOTE=JWJ;32189125]...yeah i just realized that totally bones anyone below 1680x1050 derp[/QUOTE]looks sweet as fuck on 1920x1080 though
goddamn am I the only motherfucker with a 1080p monitor here
[QUOTE=JWJ;32189156]goddamn am I the only motherfucker with a 1080p monitor here[/QUOTE]nah i just use that for games and such and use my 1280x1024 for chromey
word.. any suggestions on how I can solve this little issue here without making it look like shit?
[QUOTE=JWJ;32189169]word.. any suggestions on how I can solve this little issue here without making it look like shit?[/QUOTE]
move it lower maybe and put something in its place?
[QUOTE=JWJ;32189169]word.. any suggestions on how I can solve this little issue here without making it look like shit?[/QUOTE]
New one looks GREAT!
figured it out. used a bit of dirty CSS and some jQuery math on window resize/ready to allow the links to wrap around but also vertically center to the logo
[IMG]http://f.cl.ly/items/2L0n3X0N0u1w1l2B2Q2C/Screen%20Shot%202011-09-09%20at%2002.46.04.png[/IMG]
That gap.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/vIrfS.png[/img]
Ew
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;32190413][img]http://i.imgur.com/vIrfS.png[/img]
Ew[/QUOTE]
well what the hell else is it gonna do, disappear? the point is that the links will wrap around and still vertically center to the logo
FIX IT
[editline]8th September 2011[/editline]
:rolleye:
[QUOTE=pdkm931;32178135]I'm waiting, but have never really been into Pokemon games. Haven't played a single game. :([/QUOTE]
Neither have I except for maybe 10 minutes here and there!
the background on lethaldrive really fucks with my eyes after 2 hours sleep, isn't the contrast a bit heavy for anyone else?
just pushed it out to the main site and mostly fixed firefox compatibility
[url]http://www.lethaldrive.com/[/url]
funnily enough a lot of people saw it with a broken background and thought that was awesome, this is what you should've seen
[QUOTE=JWJ;32193772]just pushed it out to the main site and mostly fixed firefox compatibility [url]http://www.lethaldrive.com/[/url] funnily enough a lot of people saw it with a broken background and thought that was awesome, this is what you should've seen[/QUOTE] Every single week, the same story: [quote][url=http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/9/25106124789-orig.png][img]http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/9/25106124789-orig.png[/img][/url][/quote] If your website doesn't degrade gracefully without Javascript, you're doing things [b]all[/b] wrong. I can't even imagine how, given the way Javascript is layered on top of the static DOM, some of you manage to have trouble with this.
[QUOTE=JWJ;32190928]well what the hell else is it gonna do, disappear? the point is that the links will wrap around and still vertically center to the logo[/QUOTE]
You could make it so a scroll bar appeared horizontally and they all still appeared inline.
[QUOTE=StinkyJoe;32194513]Every single week, the same story: If your website doesn't degrade gracefully without Javascript, you're doing things [b]all[/b] wrong. I can't even imagine how, given the way Javascript is layered on top of the static DOM, some of you manage to have trouble with this.[/QUOTE]Wouldn't it just be a matter of hiding everything when loaded and then make it fade in nicely? That way no-js users would still see stuff, but without the fancy animation.
The only problem I can think of with that is that it will flash the entire content for a moment and then disappear before animating back in, which is not very nice.
[editline]9th September 2011[/editline]
OR you could use a <link> inside a <noscript> tag in the head, to link it to a stylesheet for non-js users which will just display everything unlike the current one, even though that seems a bit ugly and probably doesn't work.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32194583]Wouldn't it just be a matter of hiding everything when loaded and then make it fade in nicely? That way no-js users would still see stuff, but without the fancy animation.
The only problem I can think of with that is that it will flash the entire content for a moment and then disappear before animating back in, which is not very nice.
[editline]9th September 2011[/editline]
OR you could use a <link> inside a <noscript> tag in the head, to link it to a stylesheet for non-js users which will just display everything unlike the current one, even though that seems a bit ugly and probably doesn't work.[/QUOTE]
It's really not rocket science - give your html element a "no-js" tag, which is only removed by Javascript when the DOM is ready. The flashing before the animations is easy to fix through some careful ordering of how resources are loaded (and executed). A special stylesheet inside a <noscript> tag works just fine, too, but it's usually not needed - one can simply add declarations as children of .no-js when looking to only affect browsers with Javascript disabled.
[editline]9th September 2011[/editline]
Yo Benji check 'em
[QUOTE=StinkyJoe;32194687]The flashing before the animations is easy to fix through some careful ordering of how resources are loaded (and executed).[/QUOTE]
What do you mean by this?
Might just be me but the fading in looks like shit and is pretty pointless. Also the background isn't loading for me.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
