[QUOTE=RusselG;32248020]Oh god here we go, some Windows fanboy is gonna ruin shit. It's basically Windows for gaming, etc and Mac for production (multimedia). Content: [url]http://summerglaufc.org[/url] Tips, etc? Also fuck IE and JS disablers.[/QUOTE] Non-semantic and unorganized markup, gratuitous use of less.js without a fallback, no graceful degradation, disregard for the benefits of asynchronous resource loading...that last sentence...well, I'm not going to go over the same bullshit again. [url=http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/9/25411064443-orig.png]You get an F[/url]. :smile:
[QUOTE=StinkyJoe;32251892]Non-semantic and unorganized markup, gratuitous use of less.js without a fallback, no graceful degradation, disregard for the benefits of asynchronous resource loading...that last sentence...well, I'm not going to go over the same bullshit again. [url=http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/9/25411064443-orig.png]You get an F[/url]. :smile:[/QUOTE]He's the same person who shamelessly stole Reag's website (twice) and proudly claimed it as his. What did you expect?
Also, he's probably stolen this one too. I wouldn't be surprised.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32253224]He's the same person who shamelessly stole Reag's website (twice) and proudly claimed it as his. What did you expect?
Also, he's probably stolen this one too. I wouldn't be surprised.[/QUOTE]
It wouldn't be hard at all to add noscript replacement.
He clearly doesnt know html/css (if this one is stolen or a template)
Also, I don't see why people who have to use less.js do it on the client side. If I were them I'd just install node.js and less.js on a server and get my special style-sheets through that. That wouldn't require me to work out any css fallback since the client receives pure css.
Yeah using things like less client side is a waste. Use it during development and just build your stylesheet from less and include that. Don't directly include less stylesheets.
.
I'd just email them about it and hope for good karma later on.
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32253989]I'd just email them about it and hope for good karma later on.[/QUOTE]
I have sent:
[quote]
I have found a security hole with your domain manager that could allow someone to take control of any domain with just the email that it was registered with. Other companies offer rewards for finding and reporting bugs - obviously you would want to verify the issue first but how would I go about negotiating a reward and I would obviously sign a non-disclosure agreement so that your reputation isn't damaged (I myself have registered about 10 domains with you and have been thoroughly impressed so far).
[/quote]
The hole was huge - literally could take control of any domain registered with them just by knowing the email (which wouldn't be too hard to find out as is in most cases just the email of the web admin).
[QUOTE=spidersdesign;32254037]I have sent:
The hole was huge - literally could take control of any domain registered with them just by knowing the email (which wouldn't be too hard to find out as is in most cases just the email of the web admin).[/QUOTE]name.com?
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32254921]name.com?[/QUOTE]
no - uk company
[QUOTE=spidersdesign;32254037]I have sent:
The hole was huge - literally could take control of any domain registered with them just by knowing the email (which wouldn't be too hard to find out as is in most cases just the email of the web admin).[/QUOTE]
You are a kind man
[QUOTE=spidersdesign;32254037]I have sent:
The hole was huge - literally could take control of any domain registered with them just by knowing the email (which wouldn't be too hard to find out as is in most cases just the email of the web admin).[/QUOTE]
Although it's nice that you're reporting this, "Hey guys I found this exploit when do I get the money" sits oddly with me. Just the wording, that's all.
[img]http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4630/portfoliofinal.png[/img]
I have been back to this design so much, I think it is getting somewhere now though.
[QUOTE=Sharpshooter;32258182][img]http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4630/portfoliofinal.png[/img]
I have been back to this design so much, I think it is getting somewhere now though.[/QUOTE]
don't you think it'd make more sense if after it said (but not limited to!) it has a : instead of a ; ?
[QUOTE=Ac!dL3ak;32258213]don't you think it'd make more sense if after it said (but not limited to!) it has a : instead of a ; ?[/QUOTE]
Yes, it proably would, thats a photoshop mockup so I was just writing the text off the top of my head to fill out a bit of content, I will give it a good proof read before I type it up for real. Cheers for pointing it out.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32253224]He's the same person who shamelessly stole Reag's website (twice) and proudly claimed it as his. What did you expect?
Also, he's probably stolen this one too. I wouldn't be surprised.[/QUOTE]
The background of this one was taken from [url]http://tdoyle.me/dev/blue/[/url] (down right now) (with permission), but you can still see hints of [url]http://reager.org/[/url] when you click Projects.
[QUOTE=deadeye536;32258381]The background of this one was taken from [url]http://tdoyle.me/dev/blue/[/url] (down right now) (with permission), but you can still see hints of [url]http://reager.org/[/url] when you click Projects.[/QUOTE]
Oh wow, I used the same class name, fuck I'm gonna die.
Anyway, I see the downsides of LESS client side, but I can't be arsed to find out how to set up node.
I have it installed and all, but can anyone explain how to implement it?
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;32253262]It wouldn't be hard at all to add noscript replacement.
He clearly doesnt know html/css (if this one is stolen or a template)[/QUOTE]
It's not that I don't know HTML/CSS, it's just that I am a lazy fuck when it comes to the browser specific gradients, etc. That is why I use LESS.
Also, it's not a template, it [b]IS[/b] made by me, with inclusion of the Google+ buttons (by pixify) and I'm using jquery.scrollTo, an opensource plugin (before you accuse me of stealing from Reag, again.)
[QUOTE=RusselG;32259324]Oh wow, I used the same class name, fuck I'm gonna die.
Anyway, I see the downsides of LESS client side, but I can't be arsed to find out how to set up node.
I have it installed and all, but can anyone explain how to implement it?
It's not that I don't know HTML/CSS, it's just that I am a lazy fuck when it comes to the browser specific gradients, etc. That is why I use LESS.
Also, it's not a template, it [b]IS[/b] made by me, with inclusion of the Google+ buttons (by pixify) and I'm using jquery.scrollTo, an opensource plugin (before you accuse me of stealing from Reag, again.)[/QUOTE]
maybe just copy the result of the LESS file and put it in a separate style sheet and just link that instead?
[QUOTE=RusselG;32259324]Anyway, I see the downsides of LESS client side, but I can't be arsed to find out how to set up node.
I have it installed and all, but can anyone explain how to implement it?[/QUOTE]
Whoever told you to set up node just to serve a less stylesheet is silly. Less comes with a compiler that you can run from the command line for a reason.
[url]http://lesscss.org/#-client-side-usage[/url]
Read the "Command-line usage" section.
You people really ought to actually learn more about the tools you're using before you use them lol.
All the current public javascript game engines fail to cover one crucial area to web-based success: online multiplayer
I really can't wait for you to put up a public version of the game, from what I've seen before it'll be sweet as hell.
[QUOTE=RusselG;32248020]Content: [url]http://summerglaufc.org[/url]
Tips, etc?
Also fuck IE and JS disablers.[/QUOTE]
[url=http://i.imgur.com/4ab0X.png]What's wrong with IE?[/url]
It displays pretty close to Chrome with only 2 tweaks: removing the filters, and adding a doctype.
Just because you neglect a doctype, or wish to stick to age-old filters doesn't mean you should exclude IE users from visiting your page with IE9 is a fine browser for most purposes.
those buttons remind me of google's buttons
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;32260334]Whoever told you to set up node just to serve a less stylesheet is silly. Less comes with a compiler that you can run from the command line for a reason.
[url]http://lesscss.org/#-client-side-usage[/url]
Read the "Command-line usage" section.
You people really ought to actually learn more about the tools you're using before you use them lol.[/QUOTE]Hey, I never told him to use it on the server, I just asked why people have to use it on the client instead of finding a way to precompile it.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32264697]Hey, I never told him to use it on the server, I just asked why people have to use it on the client instead of finding a way to precompile it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32253315]Also, I don't see why people who have to use less.js do it on the client side. [B]If I were them I'd just install node.js and less.js on a server and get my special style-sheets through that.[/B] That wouldn't require me to work out any css fallback since the client receives pure css.[/QUOTE]
:P
This year they're teaching us js and jquery. Perfect, I don't need to study anything :dance:
[editline]13th September 2011[/editline]
Oh and next year is JSP. Bleh.
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;32260334]Whoever told you to set up node just to serve a less stylesheet is silly. Less comes with a compiler that you can run from the command line for a reason.
[url]http://lesscss.org/#-client-side-usage[/url]
Read the "Command-line usage" section.
You people really ought to actually learn more about the tools you're using before you use them lol.[/QUOTE]
I was looking at that this morning. Trying now.
[QUOTE=deadeye536;32262536][url=http://i.imgur.com/4ab0X.png]What's wrong with IE?[/url]
It displays pretty close to Chrome with only 2 tweaks: removing the filters, and adding a doctype.
Just because you neglect a doctype, or wish to stick to age-old filters doesn't mean you should exclude IE users from visiting your page with IE9 is a fine browser for most purposes.[/QUOTE]
Hmm, I swear it had a doctype. I'll make it not show on IE8 and below.
[editline]ikhklgsah[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ac!dL3ak;32262659]those buttons remind me of google's buttons[/QUOTE]
[quote]Also, it's not a template, it [b]IS[/b] made by me, with inclusion of the [b]Google+ buttons (by pixify)[/b] and I'm using jquery.scrollTo, an opensource plugin (before you accuse me of stealing from Reag, again.)[/quote]
Logo I'm working on for a mod project I'm a part of. Building them a Drupal site as well, but still need to get the layout designed for that.
[img]http://jacques.corbytue.ch/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/mco_logo.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32266178]Logo I'm working on for a mod project I'm a part of. Building them a Drupal site as well, but still need to get the layout designed for that.
[img]http://jacques.corbytue.ch/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/mco_logo.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
It'd be better to cc if the image quality wasn't shit.
[QUOTE=Jelly;32266196]It'd be better to cc if the image quality wasn't shit.[/QUOTE]
This any better:
[img]http://jacques.corbytue.ch/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/mcotest.jpg[/img]
I know the blue bit looks shit, just trying to tie the logo for the mod into the original games visual identity.
[img]http://60.251.1.52/taiwan/games/pc/img/mechcommander2_logo.gif[/img]
/edit.
Damn, some of the kerning is really off :/
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
