[QUOTE=commander204;32731760]Ugh, how can you say it looks like shit, when the only thing that we can see is:
[code]
main()
{
print('Hello, Dart!');
}
[/code]
By this standard does C++ "look like shit" too?
[code]
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}
[/code]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B[/url][/QUOTE]
I'm going to invent a programming language with a "Hello world" like this:
[code]print "Hello world!"[/code]
It's quite elegant! I'll put it on the homepage too so I can promote the language as really terse. But I'll make sure the other grammar is like this:
[code]
define_a_variable variable##boolean##myvar //COMMENT// <- All variables must be prefixed with variable##[type]##
set_a_variable variable##boolean##myvar SETTO true
//IF// (variable##boolean##myvar EQL true) //THEN//
//BLOCK_START//
my_function "Hello world!"
//FOR// (variable##integer##i SETTO 0 //NEXT// variable##integer##i ADD 1 //NEXT// variable##integer##i LESSTHANOREQUALTO 5) //THEN//
//BLOCK_START//
print "Hi!" COMBINE constant##string##NEW_LINE
//BLOCK_END//
//END_FOR//
//BLOCK_END//
//END_IF//[/code]
Is it still as elegant now that you've seen the rest of the grammar? :smile:
[QUOTE=a2h;32739785][code]
define_a_variable variable##boolean##myvar //COMMENT// <- All variables must be prefixed with variable##[type]##
set_a_variable variable##boolean##myvar SETTO true
//IF// (variable##boolean##myvar EQL true) //THEN//
//BLOCK_START//
my_function "Hello world!"
//FOR// (variable##integer##i SETTO 0 //NEXT// variable##integer##i ADD 1 //NEXT// variable##integer##i LESSTHANOREQUALTO 5) //THEN//
//BLOCK_START//
print "Hi!" COMBINE constant##string##NEW_LINE
//BLOCK_END//
//END_FOR//
//BLOCK_END//
//END_IF//[/code]
[/QUOTE]
Mother of God
Where do I sign up?!
[QUOTE=adamjon858;32739362]I said the shit...not shit.
It looks super cool.[/QUOTE]
Yeah sorry, I read that horribly wrong...
[QUOTE=RusselG;32736711]The only table stores the steam stuff, I like my data all inline and shit.
I forgot to make it a pointer for 'a' elements, thanks.
I think I'll reduce the amount of glow.
[editline]iamahugefaggot[/editline]
[IMG]http://puu.sh/6RVW[/IMG]
Removed the table, replicated a table layout with divs (not very semantic, but works) and changed the glows. Also added the cursor for 'a' elements. And the fix for antialiasing in Chrome. Uploading now.[/QUOTE]
I don't think the glow works due to the detailing of the background that you've chosen. I think it looks better with a plain black background.
I also dislike how much top margin you've given it as it makes my eyes focus on just the banner and not the site as a whole. It'd look nicer about 50px higher in my opinion.
Finally you need to sort out the fact that your site has scrollbars both vertically and horizontally. It appears to be due to the fact that you've set body to 100% height when it's not really needed.
[QUOTE=Emz;32742374]I don't think the glow works due to the detailing of the background that you've chosen. I think it looks better with a plain black background.
I also dislike how much top margin you've given it as it makes my eyes focus on just the banner and not the site as a whole. It'd look nicer about 50px higher in my opinion.
Finally you need to sort out the fact that your site has scrollbars both vertically and horizontally. It appears to be due to the fact that you've set body to 100% height when it's not really needed.[/QUOTE]
I'm not receiving any scrollbars, tried on Chrome, still none.
[img]http://puu.sh/6SYQ[/img]
Made the logo smaller, changed the background to some nice leather pattern.
[editline]fgsfds[/editline]
Well, fuck. I haven't set the body to 100% height anywhere in my code, hmm.
Oh, it's Modernizr doing it.
Well I get scrollbars in Chrome. If you need evidence I'll screencap it.
[QUOTE=Emz;32742507]Well I get scrollbars in Chrome. If you need evidence I'll screencap it.[/QUOTE]
Hmm, it does for some reason. But if I remove the height:100%, the page kinda breaks.
Setting it to 99.9% works and doesn't produce scrollbars, stupid Chrome. :smith:
You just need to remove the 100% height completely and make the top margin a positive number instead of a negative. The way you're doing it (to me) seems rather backwards.
I still get a vertical scrollbar also. :v:
[QUOTE=Emz;32742876]You just need to remove the 100% height completely and make the top margin a positive number instead of a negative. The way you're doing it (to me) seems rather backwards.
I still get a vertical scrollbar also. :v:[/QUOTE]
I hadn't uploaded the newest. It's up now, clean refresh (shift + f5).
The negatives are a way of vertically centering content, cross-browser.
[QUOTE=RusselG;32742887]I hadn't uploaded the newest. It's up now, clean refresh (shift + f5).
The negatives are a way of vertically centering content, cross-browser.[/QUOTE]
Use margin auto?
Use margin:auto the page isnt centered on my opera mini
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32742949]Use margin auto?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RusselG;32742887]The negatives are a way of [b]vertically[/b] centering content, cross-browser.[/QUOTE]
There is no legit way to vertically align, without using some tricks.
[QUOTE=RusselG;32743051]There is no legit way to vertically align, without using some tricks.[/QUOTE]
Just use standard margins and make sure your divs are structured in the correct order, you shouldn't need to be setting any negative margins on anything.
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32743074]Just use standard margins and make sure your divs are structured in the correct order, you shouldn't need to be setting any negative margins on anything.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://blog.themeforest.net/tutorials/vertical-centering-with-css/[/url]
This is what I'm trying to do. The only good ways of vertically aligning. I want my content in the ABSOLUTE middle of the page, and these are good ways of doing it. And I also want the effect to work on IE, so the negative margins is really the only way.
Just discovered this little gem:
[url]http://www.slaveryfootprint.org/[/url]
the way they've done the site is absolutely amazing! It's simple and classy but not boring or anything. The concept for the site is good as well,
check it out guys
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;32728369]Oh, by the way, [css]-webkit-transform: rotate(.1deg);[/css] will give anti-aliasing on Chrome. Found it while looking for a way to make the text appear nice in the no-js version of a thing I'll reveal later.
[editline]11th October 2011[/editline]
And cufon is totally awesome.[/QUOTE]
Thank you so much for this!
[QUOTE=Alcapwne;32746556]Just discovered this little gem:
[url]http://www.slaveryfootprint.org/[/url]
the way they've done the site is absolutely amazing! It's simple and classy but not boring or anything. The concept for the site is good as well,
check it out guys[/QUOTE]That's not a website, it's a masterpiece.
Speaking of masterpieces:
[url]http://www.untrainderetard.com/[/url]
(late trains, not mentally challenged people)
Also, working on getting some HTML5 video in some marketing emails for those people using an Apple device or Hotmail. Shame there's so little support for it so far.
[QUOTE=iamacyborg;32747250]Speaking of masterpieces:
[url]http://www.untrainderetard.com/[/url]
(late trains, not mentally challenged people)
Also, working on getting some HTML5 video in some marketing emails for those people using an Apple device or Hotmail. Shame there's so little support for it so far.[/QUOTE]
hahaa I first read it as 'untrained retard'
so much for A-level french heh
[url]http://illeat.eu/[/url]
a placeholder at the moment
[QUOTE=Jelly;32662190][html]
-stuff-
[/html][/QUOTE]
I did this and my page died.
[url]http://jung3o.com/newblog/[/url]
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
CC please.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
I need help with the "logo"
I CANT CHOOSE A FONT
:tinfoil:
[QUOTE=Rocket;32753387]There's no rating for this, so I'm just going to say it.
Too much blue.[/QUOTE]
how about a proper constructive criticism.
I hope you do know your rep, hasn't gone anywhere.
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;32751279]I did this and my page died.
[url]http://jung3o.com/newblog/[/url]
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
CC please.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
I need help with the "logo"
I CANT CHOOSE A FONT
:tinfoil:[/QUOTE]I think it looks a [i]bit[/i] bland as it is, it's missing that "pop" that makes a page appealing. I do like the fonts, but I think the navbar links look too plain.
[QUOTE=zzlawlzz;32751279]I did this and my page died.
[url]http://jung3o.com/newblog/[/url]
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
CC please.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
I need help with the "logo"
I CANT CHOOSE A FONT
:tinfoil:[/QUOTE]
Not enough contrast in colors; rocketsnail is a bit right in saying that there's too much blue (I think). You could do with another color or something.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
it looks pretty good otherwise
I think the content background colour has to be darker, much like the colour you have going for the title.
[img]http://f.anyhub.net/4lqz[/img]
[QUOTE=Fizzadar;32759081][img]http://f.anyhub.net/4lqz[/img][/QUOTE]
I like it, nice and clean.
As a customer, it would be cool to see my account credit somewhere on the page, I don't think it's displayed anywhere in the client area.
added a darker background color and the menus are clickable.
Hell yes, bounce rate going back
[img]http://www.gabrielecirulli.com/p/20111013-165327.png[URL="http://www.gabrielecirulli.com/p/20111013-165327.png"][/URL][/img]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.