[QUOTE=thomasfn;24975589]Not entirely sure what I'm looking at, it looks photoshopped. Also needs to be anti-aliased.[/QUOTE]
Because i would photoshop WIP game :downs:
I took the screenshot directly from the level editor, for some reason AA wasn't on.
I have been containing to work on my game project and I just added the ability to reload the level mid-game and also to export the level as a BMP, the second one required a little too little to get the results, unfortunely the way I render the level I am about at my max texture size.
[QUOTE=eXeC64;24975272]BBCode doesn't count. Neither does HTML. I doubt you can do much beyond hello world and basic variable usage in C++.[/QUOTE]
I think he meant BASIC for the BBC micro:
[img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/286964/_44506676_micro2-poster.jpg[/img]
Nostalgia'd - Had the full setup at one point.
[QUOTE=eXeC64;24975272][B]BBCode doesn't count[/B]. Neither does HTML. I doubt you can do much beyond hello world and basic variable usage in C++.[/QUOTE]
Bahahaha.
Your post is more embarassing than his "minecraft ripoff omg" whatever post.
[QUOTE=Jallen;24976745]Bahahaha.
Your post is more embarassing than his "minecraft ripoff omg" whatever post.[/QUOTE]
You lol'd when you saw it. :v:
Some progress.
[img]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/874/cloudcraft2.png[/img][img]http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/5228/cloudcraft1.png[/img]
Ideas welcome!
[QUOTE=Chandler;24974136]You may make jokes about a makefile generator generator.[/QUOTE]
I would like to make one, but I can only think of shitty ones D:
Someone make me a makefile generator generator joke generator, please. Pretty please?
[editline]05:08PM[/editline]
Or a makefile generator generator joke generator generator. I'd be fine with that, too.
yo dawg...?
[QUOTE=Chandler;24974136]You may make jokes about a makefile generator generator.[/QUOTE]
Maybe I should make my makefile generator generate .pro files.
It'd be putting a makefile generator generator in my makefile generator. Yo.
[QUOTE=Pery;24977593]Some progress.
[img_thumb]http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/874/cloudcraft2.png[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/5228/cloudcraft1.png[/img_thumb]
Ideas welcome![/QUOTE]
IsS that using WPF or WinForms?
What's the obsession with winforms? Everyone seems to use them.
It looks pretty.
[QUOTE=eXeC64;24979809]What's the obsession with winforms? Everyone seems to use them.[/QUOTE]
It's the standard UI toolkit for .NET, perhaps??
[QUOTE=eXeC64;24979809]What's the obsession with winforms? Everyone seems to use them.[/QUOTE]
It just seems to be the native toolkit for those guys.
What are the advantages of WPF anyway?
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;24979706]IsS that using WPF or WinForms?[/QUOTE]
WinForms.
[QUOTE=Pery;24980618]WinForms.[/QUOTE]
How did you do the Aero border?
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;24980662]How did you do the Aero border?[/QUOTE]
[url=http://www.codeproject.com/KB/vista/textonglass.aspx]Like this?[/url]
[QUOTE=esalaka;24980736][url=http://www.codeproject.com/KB/vista/textonglass.aspx]Like this?[/url][/QUOTE]
That's the hacky way of doing it.
There's an official 'Microsoft' way that they use for doing the wizards and such but they pulled it because people were using glass to excess on everything (Yahoo Messenger) and they didn't want it to become a fad.
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;24980775]— — but they pulled it because people were using glass to excess on everything — —[/QUOTE]
Not really surprising. I don't think any app really needs the glass effect. I mean, it's fancy, but do I really need to see through the menu bar of all these apps?
[QUOTE=leontodd;24980575]What are the advantages of WPF anyway?[/QUOTE]
It can be much faster to develop applications with and much much easier for UI designers to work with. The down side is the huge learning curve as it's unlike almost every UI library out there.
[url]http://stackoverflow.com/q/636028/13395[/url]
[editline]01:12PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;24980775]That's the hacky way of doing it.
There's an official 'Microsoft' way that they use for doing the wizards and such but they pulled it because people were using glass to excess on everything (Yahoo Messenger) and they didn't want it to become a fad.[/QUOTE]
That sounds like something Apple would do, not Microsoft.
[QUOTE=Ortzinator;24980866]That sounds like something Apple would do, not Microsoft.[/QUOTE]
Microsoft and Apple are a lot closer to each other in terms of policy than most people would like to believe.
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;24980956]Microsoft and Apple are a lot closer to each other in terms of policy than most people would like to believe.[/QUOTE]
Except that when Apple tells they're better, they actually are.
Now, if they would just mention how [B]overpriced[/B] they are...
Microsoft has its hands in too many pies, which means it's slow to change direction as trends change.
Apple will be in a similar situation in 5 years time.
Anyway, I think this is as "official" as it gets: [url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms748975.aspx[/url]
[QUOTE=Ortzinator;24981084]Anyway, I think this is as "official" as it gets: [url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms748975.aspx[/url][/QUOTE]
That'll have to do.
Cheers.
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;24981005]Microsoft has its hands in too many pies, which means it's slow to change direction as trends change.
Apple will be in a similar situation in 5 years time.[/QUOTE]
Why would Microsoft want to put its hands in pies?
They like pies.
[QUOTE=Jallen;24981150]Why would Microsoft want to put its hands in pies?[/QUOTE]
Indeed, what a waste of good pie.
I used [url=http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dialog/rtaGlassEffectLib.aspx]this[/url].
Actually I don't see any point of Microsoft pulling the glass effect, isn't Windows Vista/7 mean't to look a lot like that? Glass is visual sex IMHO.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.