That's awesome, I don't remember seeing any other posts about that
[QUOTE=Chris220;25529083]Don't!
Any content = good content (for the most part)[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Dj-J3;25528667]No worries, i like seeing other peoples progress. That's what this thread is for, right? :3:[/QUOTE]
Oh, alright. :3:
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25527996]I did those A/B tests a while back, no difference at all. But i have to say when it's less than 128 i hear a slight difference.[/QUOTE]
This also depends on the sound-hardware you are using. And you might just be used to hearing the artifacts.
When I started listening almost exclusively to FLACs I couldn't tell as much difference between qualities, but now that I have for quite a while I do hear more of the quality loss, though I usually can't tell the difference between lossless audio and high-quality lossy, but I have a friend who can.
In some cases, Ogg/MP3 can actually sound better than FLACs:
Some audio guys make errors causing some waves to be cut at the top/bottom. Since lossy compression-formats try to restore the original out of less information, they might 'accidentally' also restore those peak-values.
At least that's what my friend (the same one) told me.
[QUOTE=ZeekyHBomb;25529281]This also depends on the sound-hardware you are using. And you might just be used to hearing the artifacts.
When I started listening almost exclusively to FLACs I couldn't tell as much difference between qualities, but now that I have for quite a while I do hear more of the quality loss, though I usually can't tell the difference between lossless audio and high-quality lossy, but I have a friend who can.
In some cases, Ogg/MP3 can actually sound better than FLACs:
Some audio guys make errors causing some waves to be cut at the top/bottom. Since lossy compression-formats try to restore the original out of less information, they might 'accidentally' also restore those peak-values.
At least that's what my friend (the same one) told me.[/QUOTE]
Once you go FLAC, you don't go back. :v:
[QUOTE=Cello;25529190](sidenote - does anyone know a way to combine 2 integers and later decompose the result to get them back?).[/QUOTE]
You could use something similar to how RGB codes are encoded/decoded
[url]http://www.dreamincode.net/code/snippet845.htm[/url]
Note: I have no idea what language those variables are supposed to be in
[QUOTE=ZeekyHBomb;25529281]This also depends on the sound-hardware you are using. And you might just be used to hearing the artifacts.
When I started listening almost exclusively to FLACs I couldn't tell as much difference between qualities, but now that I have for quite a while I do hear more of the quality loss, though I usually can't tell the difference between lossless audio and high-quality lossy, but I have a friend who can.
In some cases, Ogg/MP3 can actually sound better than FLACs:
Some audio guys make errors causing some waves to be cut at the top/bottom. Since lossy compression-formats try to restore the original out of less information, they might 'accidentally' also restore those peak-values.
At least that's what my friend (the same one) told me.[/QUOTE]
There's a constant noise when i use headphones in my stereo, though i don't notice it anymore.
Also, [b]Big update![/b]
- User support
- Stats
- Online users
- Working login
- Better UI
[url=http://braxnet.org/unifrog/]Support the Unifrog![/url]
When i have the will, i'll recode it in c++ or something.
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25529896]There's a constant noise when i use headphones in my stereo, though i don't notice it anymore.
Also, [b]Big update![/b]
- User support
- Stats
- Online users
- Working login
- Better UI
[url=http://braxnet.org/unifrog/]Support the Unifrog![/url]
When i have the will, i'll recode it in c++ or something.[/QUOTE]
What [i]is[/i] this, I don't fully understand...Also it throws an exception if the http connection attempt times out.
Is that unifrog thingy supposed to be always on top of everything, so it wastes my screen space?
[QUOTE=sim642;25530171]Is that unifrog thingy supposed to be always on top of everything, so it wastes my screen space?[/QUOTE]
Drag it to bottom
????
Profit
Edit: But yeah, it is a bit in the way...
[QUOTE=r4nk_;25530052]What [i]is[/i] this, I don't fully understand...Also it throws an exception if the http connection attempt times out.[/QUOTE]
It's a brag game. And i don't know much about VB so i don't know how to fix it :v:
[QUOTE=sim642;25530171]Is that unifrog thingy supposed to be always on top of everything, so it wastes my screen space?[/QUOTE]
Yes.
[QUOTE=BlkDucky;25530186]Drag it to bottom
????
Profit
Edit: But yeah, it is a bit in the way...[/QUOTE]
Or another monitor if you have one
@Hexxeh
Will it be Open Source? You could release the source and just not include your App Key which would mean people need premium to compile & run it.
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25530203]It's a brag game. And i don't know much about VB so i don't know how to fix it :v:
Yes.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://gyazo.com/8fe2327180d028a6ba97a302fb9210eb.png[/img]
Bragging, eh? What's everyone else up to?
[img]http://f.braxupload.se/074fy6.png[/img]
Been on since yesterday
[QUOTE=CarlBooth;25530422]@Hexxeh
Will it be Open Source? You could release the source and just not include your App Key which would mean people need premium to compile & run it.[/QUOTE]
You always need premium to use anything based on Spotify other than the official Spotify desktop client.
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25530495][img_thumb]http://f.braxupload.se/074fy6.png[/img_thumb]
Been on since yesterday[/QUOTE]
You've contributed 70 times what I have.
[img]http://gyazo.com/bd507a1ceea29a300af76ee5b56238ca.png[/img]
This image has never been so appropriate.
[editline]20th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25530495][img_thumb]http://f.braxupload.se/074fy6.png[/img_thumb]
Been on since yesterday[/QUOTE]
By the way, should that "with" be there? It'd make more sense as "you have contributed X meters", wouldn't it?
lol its a meme! i get it!! v clever
[QUOTE=layla;25530644]lol its a meme! i get it!! v clever[/QUOTE]
An appropriate meme.
...Did you really rate yourself dumb?
[QUOTE=BlkDucky;25530616]
By the way, should that "with" be there? It'd make more sense as "you have contributed X meters", wouldn't it?[/QUOTE]
Really? I had that before and i thought it sounded wrong.
[QUOTE=BlkDucky;25530696]An appropriate meme.
...Did you really rate yourself dumb?[/QUOTE]
I think he realised that he made a dumb post.
In my opinion both works fine.
That unifrog should meet some friends every 100,000(?) meters.
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25530765]Really? I had that before and i thought it sounded wrong.[/QUOTE]
I'm not really sure... :v:
I think they're both correct, though.
Edit: Ooh. Unifrog page has links...
[QUOTE=BlkDucky;25530696]An appropriate meme.
...Did you really rate yourself dumb?[/QUOTE]
no its a bug in the ratings core engine.
Suddenly, Unifrog user stats!
[editline]20th October 2010[/editline]
damn ninja'd
[QUOTE=layla;25530867]no its a bug in the ratings core engine.[/QUOTE]
...What?
[editline]20th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Shammah;25530880]Suddenly, Unifrog user stats!
[editline]20th October 2010[/editline]
damn ninja'd[/QUOTE]
Edit: clicking the achievements brings up your stats for some reason. :v:
Edit2: Oh wait. It was fixed.
[QUOTE=sim642;25530858]That unifrog should meet some friends every 100,000(?) meters.[/QUOTE]
Hm, random encounters would be cool.
[QUOTE=BlkDucky;25530859]I'm not really sure... :v:
I think they're both correct, though.
Edit: Ooh. Unifrog page has links...[/QUOTE]
Yup, more stats will come. And i fixed the achievement links thing
Also, the Around the World achievement requires the program to be run 12.75 years... :colbert:
[QUOTE=Giraffen93;25530933]Hm, random encounters would be cool.
Yup, more stats will come. And i fixed the achievement links thing[/QUOTE]
Why'd you take out the "20 people helping Unifrog at once" achievements, by the way? That was cool...
[editline]20th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Shammah;25530958]Also, the Around the World achievement requires the program to be run 12.75 years...[/QUOTE]
Divided by the number of people helping, though. Unless you took that into account?
was just about to try the unifrog but it requires username and password, how do i get this?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
