[QUOTE=nivek;21947291]faze you don't work for NASA, shut the hell up.
Also your [URL]http://www.brightfusehosting.com/[/URL] is a joke.
You didn't even customize your WHMCS customer system.
Not impressed.
Something I have noticed in the past number of years is,
Those who brag about what they do, usually aren't that great at it,
and those who are the best for the most part keep their mouths shut and don't boast.
And that applies to almost everything, I'm not saying I'm good but you don't see my website linking on my facebook, Cause I don't care what anyone else thinks if i'm paying my bills.
Yeah okay you work for NASA, and I'm an international spy with a 15 inch cock.[/QUOTE]
Who's bragging? Everyone here seems to be big on "prove it" so I was simply proving what I was saying. As for not working on Goddard Space Flight Center, well look at the SpeedTest.net results, look at the image properties if you don't believe me. Look at what the ISP says.
[QUOTE=turb_;21936961][url]http://www.facepunch.com/showpost.php?p=21501149&postcount=10[/url]
Didn't get in quick enough[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but then you didn't stop posting. Therein lies your failure; you didn't let the thread die.
[QUOTE=faze;21952580]Who's bragging? Everyone here seems to be big on "prove it" so I was simply proving what I was saying. As for not working on Goddard Space Flight Center, well look at the SpeedTest.net results, look at the image properties if you don't believe me. Look at what the ISP says.[/QUOTE]
Well you brought it up, so you.
And A speedtest image doesn't convince me.
[QUOTE=faze;21895858][url]www.brightfusehosting.com[/url]
Side company, almost all PHP/jquery/jscript.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.brightfusehosting.com/?page=nixvm[/url]
[editline]05:02PM[/editline]
Backpedal completed.
[QUOTE=Zayfox;21956418][url]http://www.brightfusehosting.com/?page=nixvm[/url]
[editline]05:02PM[/editline]
Backpedal completed.[/QUOTE]
Wow, those prices are horrible
[QUOTE=turb_;21956690]Wow, those prices are horrible[/QUOTE]
Wow, that coding is horrible
[QUOTE=faze;21952580]Who's bragging? Everyone here seems to be big on "prove it" so I was simply proving what I was saying. As for not working on Goddard Space Flight Center, well look at the SpeedTest.net results, look at the image properties if you don't believe me. Look at what the ISP says.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, this man is right. I mean, speedtest results are pretty much unquestionable. I work for the CIA and it got mine right!
[img]http://www.speedtest.net/result/815296451.png[/img]
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;21935671]There is nothing wrong with jpg, and if you think otherwise you don't know what you're talking about. Certain image formats are better for certain types of images, and jpg actually happens to be the best option more often than png.[/QUOTE]
Unless it's for a website of course.
(Of course, this isn't true for pictures like photos where full quality isn't needed and it's already lossy.)
[QUOTE=nivek;21956201]Well you brought it up, so you.
And A speedtest image doesn't convince me.[/QUOTE]
Whatever, I don't care then. I'm not out to impress some kids on Facepunch.
[QUOTE=faze;21961917]Whatever, I don't care then. I'm not out to impress some kids on Facepunch.[/QUOTE]
By calling us 'kids', do you feel more powerful? Even know we are nearly all your age.
[QUOTE=hdalv;21959230]Yeah, this man is right. I mean, speedtest results are pretty much unquestionable. I work for the CIA and it got mine right!
[img]http://www.speedtest.net/result/815296451.png[/img][/QUOTE]
lol.
[QUOTE=faze;21961917]Whatever, I don't care then. I'm not out to impress some kids on Facepunch.[/QUOTE]
You really don't know how old we are so calling us kids is just ignorant.
Your site code sucks, it looks bad, and the prices blow.
See ya.
[QUOTE=nivek;21962905]lol.
You really don't know how old we are so calling us kids is just ignorant.
Your site code sucks, it looks bad, and the prices blow.
See ya.[/QUOTE]
K.
[QUOTE=arienh4;21959283]Unless it's for a website of course.
(Of course, this isn't true for pictures like photos where full quality isn't needed and it's already lossy.)[/QUOTE]
That depends entirely on the content of the images going in to the website. More solid blocks of color = use png, other shit = use jpg. There's no hard fast rule to it, you should be checking the file size of each format at optimum settings for each image and using the lowest one.
Maybe it's just my design style, but the majority of the time for me a properly done jpg is smaller, and you can't see any artifacts.
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;21970596]That depends entirely on the content of the images going in to the website. More solid blocks of color = use png, other shit = use jpg. There's no hard fast rule to it, you should be checking the file size of each format at optimum settings for each image and using the lowest one.
Maybe it's just my design style, but the majority of the time for me a properly done jpg is smaller, and you can't see any artifacts.[/QUOTE]
There's really no excuse for using JPEG for anything you've created in Illustrator or Photoshop, like buttons etc. If you want to decrease the size, use PNG-8.
This thread has gone severely off topic, so I'm closing it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
