Feedback on image upload site

[not_Morph53]

[QUOTE=Tools;26730966]
File name or file size won't do.[/QUOTE]

Why would you even suggest those as options?

[Tools]

[QUOTE=not_Morph53;26731667]Why would you even suggest those as options?[/QUOTE]

[I]Some[/I] people thinks that's enough, glad he doesn't though. :smile:

[CombineGuru]

md5_file

[^-^]

[QUOTE=CombineGuru;26735915]md5_file[/QUOTE]

Surely that's really CPU-intensive, if you get more traffic would it be worth sacrificing the diskspace for CPU speed?

[TehWhale]

It's not intensive with files of less than 6MB.

[Siemens]

md5 is fast

[Darksoul]

[QUOTE=^-^;26741271]Surely that's really CPU-intensive, if you get more traffic would it be worth sacrificing the diskspace for CPU speed?[/QUOTE]

Huh?

[Qombat]

[QUOTE=^-^;26741271]Surely that's really CPU-intensive, if you get more traffic would it be worth sacrificing the diskspace for CPU speed?[/QUOTE]

What...

[not_Morph53]

He's probably thinking of SHA-256/512, which is less then half as fast.

[CombineGuru]

[root@web3 zimg.eu]# php -f test.php
100mb.bin md5'ed in 0.2866849899292 seconds.
[root@web3 zimg.eu]#

:eng101:

[TehWhale]

Fast.

[StinkyJoe]

Between 8/11 seconds on a dual-core laptop for a 900mb file. (md5_file)

[CombineGuru]

Amazing new design: [url]http://www.zimg.eu/[/url]

Made by [url=http://www.facepunch.com/members/120829-BrettJay]BrettJay[/url] :lovewcc:

[Qombat]

[QUOTE=CombineGuru;26745469]Amazing new design: [url]http://www.zimg.eu/[/url]

Made by [url=http://www.facepunch.com/members/120829-BrettJay]BrettJay[/url] :lovewcc:[/QUOTE]

You need to preload that hover image.

[CombineGuru]

[QUOTE=Qombat;26745589]You need to preload that hover image.[/QUOTE]

Huh? It's one file.

[Darksoul]

Why won't your image host let me upload this image?

[URL=http://dsservers.net/images/SS-2010-11-06_22.41.35.png][IMG]http://dsservers.net/images/SS-2010-11-06_22.41.35.th.png[/IMG][/URL]

[CombineGuru]

[url]http://www.zimg.eu/i/4171847171[/url] ..?

[Darksoul]

Click on it.

[CombineGuru]

[img]http://gyazo.com/c19fdcf1afe8a51695755eb821377485.png[/img]

[Darksoul]

[url]http://dsservers.net/images/SS-2010-11-06_22.41.35.png[/url]

[CombineGuru]

Because it's 18mb?

[Darksoul]

But its so pretty!

Anyway, my offer still stands.

[ifaux]

Goddammit BrettJay, you didn't even give me the time to start a design.
:saddowns:

[BrettJay]

[QUOTE=ifaux;26746470]Goddammit BrettJay, you didn't even give me the time to start a design.
:saddowns:[/QUOTE]

I'm sorry :saddowns:

But surely it would have been worse if you'd already spent hours on your own design.

[TehWhale]

Nice to see you finished it, Brett. Looks awesome.

[editline]17th December 2010[/editline]

I don't particularly like the "information" icon that lets you know what the upload sizes and file types allowed are. Maybe that's just me.

[editline]17th December 2010[/editline]

I also think if you do a quick extension check when the upload form changes (while keeping the server check), you can then disable the Upload button.

[url]http://cl.ly/3fE1[/url]

And it can turn into something like this:
[url]http://cl.ly/3f6C[/url]

[Maccabee]

type="file multiple"

It's html5 so It'll only work in new browsers but it's backwards compatible.

[torekk]

A progressbar would be nice, but isn't really needed.

[c-unit]

[QUOTE=Torekk;26757529]A progressbar would be nice, but isn't really needed.[/QUOTE]

It's really too fast for a progress bar.

[Darksoul]

[QUOTE=Torekk;26757529]A progressbar would be nice, but isn't really needed.[/QUOTE]

Bottom left:

[IMG]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/6972/ss20101217163505.png[/IMG]

[Qontrol]

[QUOTE=darksoul69;26762967]Bottom left:

[img_thumb]http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/6972/ss20101217163505.png[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]

That's only on Chrome. Filemaw and Anyhub have that too.