What are you working on? v15

[20k]

[QUOTE=sLysdal;27236918]-snip-[/QUOTE]

[IMG_thumb]http://i55.tinypic.com/1zzj8jl.png[/IMG_thumb]

Thats using exactly the same settings as the snowy grass. If you look closly, theyre identical :v:

[BlkDucky]

[QUOTE=DuCT;27237035]So I wake up today and think, "Maybe I'll check WAYWO", and lo and behold I am greeted with 84 new posts! "Oh yay! Content galore!" Oh how wrong I was...[/QUOTE]

Y'know what's more annoying than no content? People complaining about there being no content.

[HubmaN]

[QUOTE=BlkDucky;27237053]Y'know what's more annoying than no content? People complaining about there being no content.[/QUOTE]
Y'know what's more annoying that people complaining about no content? People complaining about people complaining about no content.

[20k]

[QUOTE=BlkDucky;27237053]Y'know what's more annoying than no content? People complaining about there being no content.[/QUOTE]

Y'know whats more annoying than people complaining about there being no content? People complaining about people complaining about no content :v:

That was a joke by the way :3

Edit:
Goddam bloody ninjas

[Combino]

[QUOTE=high;27237033]UAC has the right idea, but their implementation is such crap. Only thing UAC has done so far is, force everything to say "Run this program as administrator" and cause support to have to deal with idiots who ignore it, wondering why the program doesn't work.

Bitches don't know about my sandboxed browser.

Personally I find AVs useless especially when you know a decent amount about computers. Just use something like Comodo Defense+ (properly configured, not their shit defaults). Haven't had a virus since I was like 11-12.[/QUOTE]

I totally agree with you on those points, however I think it's unfair to blame user error on any technical deficiencies in UAC.

Windows cops a lot of flack because it has a largest slice of the marketshare pie. If another OS were to take over, idiots would cause trouble for that OS too.

You can't blame the system for morons not knowing how to operate it.

[Blade]

[QUOTE=Combino;27237122]I totally agree with you on those points, however I think it's unfair to blame user error on any technical deficiencies in UAC.

Windows cops a lot of flack because it has a largest slice of the marketshare pie. If another OS were to take over, idiots would cause trouble for that OS too.

You can't blame the system for morons not knowing how to operate it.[/QUOTE]

Well they already make windows user friendly enough. Why throw something into it that you know is going to confuse the shit out of the majority of your user base?

[Combino]

[QUOTE=high;27237195]Well they already make windows user friendly enough. Why throw something into it that you know is going to confuse the shit out of the majority of your user base? Anyways, I don't really blame the users. UAC is just a big piece of shit. (First thing I disabled in Win7 after installation)[/QUOTE]

So when you use Linux you run as root always?

[Blade]

[QUOTE=Combino;27237225]So when you use Linux you run as root always?[/QUOTE]

That isn't fair. Linux has a better user system. I just think instead of spending time on UAC they should be teaching people about security. UAC doesn't stop someone from running a virus as administrator.

[20k]

i think the relative merits of vista, windows 7 and linux are beyond the scope of this thread
back to waywo?

[Combino]

[QUOTE=high;27237287]That isn't fair. Linux has a better user system. I just think instead of spending time on UAC they should be teaching people about security. UAC doesn't stop someone from running a virus as administrator.[/QUOTE]

It isn't fair because Linux users are generally more knowledgable?

And UAC doesn't stop someone from allowing a virus to run as administrator, but no OS will. The idea is that it stops the virus automatically running as administrator, so that when it does run, the damage it can do is contained.

[Overv]

[QUOTE=Combino;27237363]It isn't fair because Linux users are generally more knowledgable?

And UAC doesn't stop someone from allowing a virus to run as administrator, but no OS will. The idea is that it stops the virus automatically running as administrator, so that when it does run, the damage it can do is contained.[/QUOTE]

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNW8sW31oZc[/media]

[Blade]

[QUOTE=Combino;27237363]And UAC doesn't stop someone from allowing a virus to run as administrator, but no OS will.[/QUOTE]

I didn't mean literally... Teaching people about security stops them from running viruses instead of wasting time on the hassle that is UAC.

[yakahughes]

I call for a new thread, WAYNO, What Are You Not Working On, because that's all this thread is.

[sim642]

[QUOTE=yakahughes;27237583]I call for a new thread, WAYNO, What Are You Not Working On, because that's all this thread is.[/QUOTE]

That would be WAYNWO

[yakahughes]

[QUOTE=sim642;27237611]That would be WAYNWO[/QUOTE]

WAYNO made for better effect.

[20k]

The irony is, you are complaining about the lack of content by making contentless posts yourself..

[DrLuke]

I'm not working on that MMORPG with epic battles of more than a thousand people at once I always wanted to make.

[20k]

[QUOTE=DrLuke;27237782]I'm not working on that MMORPG with epic battles of more than a thousand people at once I always wanted to make.[/QUOTE]

What language are you not programming it in?

[vpaan]

[QUOTE=high;27237485]I didn't mean literally... Teaching people about security stops them from running viruses instead of wasting time on the hassle that is UAC.[/QUOTE]
How on earth is UAC a hassle? Literally the only time I see the UAC dialogs is when installing new software or using old software that hasn't been updated to follow new guidelines which requires running as administrator: you can't expect Microsoft to stick to a shitty security model forever. It's the exact fucking same thing as the sudo password dialogs in any modern Linux distribution when you're changing settings or updating packages.

[quote=HubmaN]Elevating through UAC is modal and intrusive (and for some reason disables DWM while active, giving some 2 seconds of lag before and after).[/quote]
This is done on purpose so that applications can't automate UAC elevations.

[DrLuke]

[QUOTE=Icedshot;27237901]What language are you not programming it in?[/QUOTE]

Assembly

[20k]

[QUOTE=DrLuke;27237973]Assembly[/QUOTE]

I get the feeling that wouldnt take a while

[Jallen]

[url]http://notch.tumblr.com/post/2623477410/strategy-meeting-day-results[/url][quote]Oh, and I’ve finally committed the Music Blocks to the repository.

(Oh, wait, no, I didn’t.. Doing so broke git, so we’re changing to svn because git is horrible and evil)[/quote]inb4 baw

[Falcqn]

Hnnnng git isn't horrible why notch so stupid

[sLysdal]

[QUOTE=Icedshot;27237041][IMG_thumb]http://i55.tinypic.com/1zzj8jl.png[/IMG_thumb]

Thats using exactly the same settings as the snowy grass. If you look closly, theyre identical :v:[/QUOTE]

Tbh i liked the old lava texture better, it was a try worth tho :)

[Tezzanator92]

I took a break from trying to solve the terrain generation in my minecraft server.
I added some C# Scripting support for player scripts:
[cpp]
using System;

namespace Netcraft.Scripting
{
public class playerlist : Script
{
public playerlist(Server serv) : base(serv)
{
serv.chatConsole.AddCommand("playerlist", showplayers, false);
}

private void showplayers(string[] args, BasePlayer caller)
{
string output = "Players: ";

foreach (BasePlayer ply in server.players)
{
output = output + (string)ply.GetPlayerData("name") + " ";
}

server.chatConsole.Print(output, caller);
}
}
}
[/cpp]
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/286964/netcraft/minez.png[/img][img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/286964/netcraft/mines.png[/img]
And I also made it so players can have differing connection methods, for example. Above is a "LocalPlayer" which is the server console itself. and ordinary player is a "NetworkedPlayer" This is how I will implement a remote console "SSHPlayer"?. With this set up, whatever you can do on the server box a player can do if they have admin rights!

[Not DuCT]

[QUOTE=BlkDucky;27237053]Y'know what's more annoying than no content? People complaining about there being no content.[/QUOTE]

I can still try to get things back on track. Of course, it would probably help if I posted content also...

[Dlaor-guy]

[QUOTE=iRzilla;27239797]I know I'm late but who the hell visits w3schools?[/QUOTE]
Handy HTML & CSS & PHP & SQL & Javascript references perhaps?

[CarlBooth]

[QUOTE=iRzilla;27239797]I know I'm late but who the hell visits w3schools?[/QUOTE]

w3schools for web developers is like the bible for Christians

Even though you know it back to front you still dip in every now and again for that warm fuzzy feeling.

[editline]0[/editline]

also turb you keep IMing me on Steam at like 4am when its downloading updates so that's why I cant reply

[Lily]

[QUOTE=Combino;27234262]47.2% of the internet need to get with the times.

It's about time we moved on from that 10 year old pile of crap.[/QUOTE]

I know I'm like 60 posts late, but really, its an old pile of crap, a working pile of crap thats not very resource intensive, and works with the older computers most people run
Most people cant afford expensive pre-builts and dont have the knowledge to build them

[limitofinf]

Hey,

I didn't think that "92 new posts" meant "90 worthless, content-less posts" :bang: