[QUOTE=MadPro119;46306811]Turned a research paper for my Intro to Interactive media course into a website.
Check it out: [url]http://people.rit.edu/cxs1466/jqparallax/index.html[/url][/QUOTE]
Performance on the page is pretty terrible when scrolling. You should look in to techniques to optimize this because bad performance is by far the worst thing about websites like this.
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;46312111]Performance on the page is pretty terrible when scrolling. You should look in to techniques to optimize this because bad performance is by far the worst thing about websites like this.[/QUOTE]
Its strange, my performance on the page is subpar for chrome but is fine on firefox. Never tried to optimize css/html/jquery but here we go I guess.
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;46312111]Performance on the page is pretty terrible when scrolling. You should look in to techniques to optimize this because bad performance is by far the worst thing about websites like this.[/QUOTE]
Got no issues whatsoever on Chrome... (30 fps video)
[vid]http://svenskunganka.com/share/2014-10-24_03-26-44.mp4[/vid]
[QUOTE=Svenskunganka;46316056]Got no issues whatsoever on Chrome... (30 fps video)
[vid]http://svenskunganka.com/share/2014-10-24_03-26-44.mp4[/vid][/QUOTE]
Thanks, thats pretty informative. Strange that performance seems everywhere.
Everyone everywhere has different computers running at different performance levels, and some people are still in the dark ages of super slow computing. You've gotta cater a little to those people.
Working on a major portfolio overhaul.
Going to go in a clean and minimalistic direction. Should be interesting once I get a little further with it.
[url=http://www.oesterkilde.dk]www.oesterkilde.dk[/url]
[t]https://mir-cdn.behance.net/v1/rendition/wip/fs/1490087.544a179dcb937.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Kosai106;46318460]Working on a major portfolio overhaul.
Going to go in a clean and minimalistic direction. Should be interesting once I get a little further with it.
[url=http://www.oesterkilde.dk]www.oesterkilde.dk[/url]
[t]https://mir-cdn.behance.net/v1/rendition/wip/fs/1490087.544a179dcb937.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
Looks really nice.
You can achieve that look with [URL="http://jsfiddle.net/rry2ue05/"]pure CSS though[/URL], in case you want to dump the image.
[QUOTE=wauterboi;46317746]Everyone everywhere has different computers running at different performance levels, and some people are still in the dark ages of super slow computing. You've gotta cater a little to those people.[/QUOTE]
I'm on a brand new macbook pro, it's not the computer in this case haha. When you do websites like this you need to make sure that you're forcing hardware acceleration (usually via a little CSS trick) and cutting out things that are resource intensive to render (like shadows) whenever they're not contributing a ton to the design.
Also considering a portfolio overhall, will it look ok, or too outdated style wise? (warning, tons of unoptimised broken css atm, just don't look at it, will fix it :P)
[url="http://members.optusnet.com.au/braathen/Portfolio/"]LINK[/url]
[QUOTE=Isotope;46329517]Also considering a portfolio overhall, will it look ok, or too outdated style wise? (warning, tons of unoptimised broken css atm, just don't look at it, will fix it :P)
[url="http://members.optusnet.com.au/braathen/Portfolio/"]LINK[/url][/QUOTE]
Planning on making it responsive? :)
[QUOTE=Isotope;46329517]Also considering a portfolio overhall, will it look ok, or too outdated style wise? (warning, tons of unoptimised broken css atm, just don't look at it, will fix it :P)
[url="http://members.optusnet.com.au/braathen/Portfolio/"]LINK[/url][/QUOTE]
I'm on Windows 8, Chrome (latest version) and when I hover over Web (or any other nav elements that have elements behind them) all the elements behind it start shaking once you unhover that element.
If you don't know what I'm talking about, hover over "Web" and then look at "Music" and "Photography" as you remove your mouse from "Web".
[QUOTE=Cyberuben;46331079]I'm on Windows 8, Chrome (latest version) and when I hover over Web (or any other nav elements that have elements behind them) all the elements behind it start shaking once you unhover that element.
If you don't know what I'm talking about, hover over "Web" and then look at "Music" and "Photography" as you remove your mouse from "Web".[/QUOTE]
Linux Firefox same issue
[QUOTE=Cyberuben;46331079]I'm on Windows 8, Chrome (latest version) and when I hover over Web (or any other nav elements that have elements behind them) all the elements behind it start shaking once you unhover that element.
If you don't know what I'm talking about, hover over "Web" and then look at "Music" and "Photography" as you remove your mouse from "Web".[/QUOTE]
Same here (Windows 7, Chrome latest)
Here's what Cyberuben means:
[vid]http://svenskunganka.com/share/2014-10-26_03-01-03.mp4[/vid]
[QUOTE=Moofy;46326683]Looks really nice.
You can achieve that look with [URL="http://jsfiddle.net/rry2ue05/"]pure CSS though[/URL], in case you want to dump the image.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I know, but I couldn't be arsed to do it like that. I'd rather work on getting the rest of the site developed.
Building my first website. Learning from codecademy.
Going good so far. It's like complicated legos.
Does anyone have any information on WCF/Web services?
If you could add me on steam that would be great, but not needed if you don't want.
I am trying to make a web service for an application, since you don't want the database information in the program itself. However, how do I prevent people from using certain methods, unless they are logged in and the such? What I have read just doesn't seem to explain it well.
Working on a website with a concept pretty similar to Space Email.
You can go on and either write or read messages. Writers are completely anonymous, so it's a way to just vent and get shit off your chest or whatever and not worry about being judged, like no one is listening.
[IMG]http://puu.sh/ctnk4/ee3e01e8e2.png[/IMG]
[url]http://anonwhisper.cf/[/url]
Here's the link if anyone wants to take a look. It's still pretty WIP and there's a lot more I want to do with it. My issue for now is finding an efficient way to make sure a user doesn't get the same message twice, which doesn't seem all that easy in SQL as far as I can tell.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/RpJlkb7.png[/IMG]
Added rating stats to profiles for the mybb ratings plugin I made.
[QUOTE=Kosai106;46341166]Yeah I know, but I couldn't be arsed to do it like that. I'd rather work on getting the rest of the site developed.[/QUOTE]
But making it with pure CSS lies within the "I'd rather work on getting the rest of the site developed"?
I even gave you the code, how can you not be arsed :suicide:
[QUOTE=isnipeu;46350136][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/RpJlkb7.png[/IMG]
Added rating stats to profiles for the mybb ratings plugin I made.[/QUOTE]
Cool. I'm currently re-writing my mybb plugin. is ur's public?
[QUOTE=jung3o;46350361]Cool. I'm currently re-writing my mybb plugin. is ur's public?[/QUOTE] Nah, it's not really in a state where it should be public (all the permissions and stuff are hardcoded)
[t]http://i.imgur.com/hPVaaHN.png[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/JloHxsB.png[/t]
currently just finished up adding/editing/removing new ratings from admincp
(Just reused old code since it was the same)
I want this fibre cable: [url]http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/192929-255tbps-worlds-fastest-network-could-carry-all-the-internet-traffic-single-fiber[/url]
Quite amazing what a leap from the normal 100Gbps fibre cables to 225Tbps fibre cables.
[QUOTE=Svenskunganka;46353408]I want this fibre cable: [url]http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/192929-255tbps-worlds-fastest-network-could-carry-all-the-internet-traffic-single-fiber[/url]
Quite amazing what a leap from the normal 100Gbps fibre cables to 225Tbps fibre cables.[/QUOTE]
As cool as it would be to have it, it'd be entirely pointless since like no other line would provide those speeds.
Its like me CAT6ing my house despite only one of my computers having gigabit Ethernet and the cable modem only capable of 1MB/s sustained.
[QUOTE=Shoar;46357096]As cool as it would be to have it, it'd be entirely pointless since like no other line would provide those speeds.[/QUOTE]
I wonder what providers will offer in 2024
[QUOTE=Knoxed;46358956]I wonder what providers will offer in 2024[/QUOTE]
10 tbit download, 1tbit upload?
[QUOTE=Shoar;46357096]As cool as it would be to have it, it'd be entirely pointless since like no other line would provide those speeds.[/QUOTE]
it would be perfect for undersea trunks. Think about this, the entire of Western Australia runs its SEA and European connections in a 50Gbps trunk... that's fucking nothing in reality
the cross country line is only 215Gbps and the entirety of Australia's overseas connections would be less than 1Tbps
[QUOTE=wizard`;46359452]it would be perfect for undersea trunks. Think about this, the entire of Western Australia runs its SEA and European connections in a 50Gbps trunk... that's fucking nothing in reality
the cross country line is only 215Gbps and the entirety of Australia's overseas connections would be less than 1Tbps[/QUOTE]
And a single cable would up that to 225Tbps. The availablility of bandwidth would be on a whole other level. Also, it wasn't a 1m cable the speed was tested on, it was tested on a 1km cable. I'm nothing but impressed of the leap. According to the source, current fibre links max at 100Gbps, so from 100Gbps to 225Tbps is quite a leap forth.
[QUOTE=Cyberuben;46359127]10 tbit download, 1tbit upload?[/QUOTE]
Myea, or 255tbps?
[url]http://goo.gl/d1PLkr[/url]
:D
Edit: oups, was too late am i.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
