• What are you working on? v7
    7,420 replies, posted
[QUOTE=swift and shift;36927256]hanging commas are good [editline]25th July 2012[/editline] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ng95M-cRb44[/media][/QUOTE] Undeniable evidence that Ruby was literally engineered by the CIA to exert mind control upon the Australians.
Woops wrong thread. /snip
Had some spare time in this holiday, so I decided to make a alternative to this site: [url]www.komplett.no[/url] That's where I get all el-thing, so it's a site I use often WIP(It's centered): [t]http://i.imgur.com/vQU4L.png[/t]
[t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2951174/webdesign/65.png[/t]
Messing around with possible portfolio design options; [img]http://s.tdoyle.me/Tom_Doyle_-_Home-20120726-015155.png[/img] Which one of these look better? (if you can't notice the left side has a VERY subtle pattern and a slightly different gradient) Also yes, that is a huge ass header.
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;36939314][t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2951174/webdesign/65.png[/t][/QUOTE] At least the design is awesome!
[QUOTE=douche beat;36942214] Which one of these look better? (if you can't notice the left side has a VERY subtle pattern and a slightly different gradient) [/QUOTE] left
It's not my work, but I found a website that breaks all web design concepts known to man. I wanted you to see. [url]http://www.wolffolins.com/work/london-2012[/url]
[QUOTE=Slater;36944443]It's not my work, but I found a website that breaks all web design concepts known to man. I wanted you to see. [url]http://www.wolffolins.com/work/london-2012[/url][/QUOTE] it looks like a site that uses masonry?
[quote] [IMG]http://gabrielecirulli.com/p/20120726-183906.png[/IMG] [/quote] @charliesome #rails #owned
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;36945373]It doesn't, but it also doesn't look that special to me. I get lost in this kind of clumsy mess of blocks. [/QUOTE] It's just impossible to read and horrible.
[QUOTE=Slater;36944443]It's not my work, but I found a website that breaks all web design concepts known to man. I wanted you to see. [url]http://www.wolffolins.com/work/london-2012[/url][/QUOTE] This is much better by miles: [url]http://worrydream.com/[/url]
[QUOTE=fritzel;36948926]This is much better by miles: [url]http://worrydream.com/[/url][/QUOTE] That scrolling just ruins it
[QUOTE=Dotmister;36948945]That scrolling just ruins it[/QUOTE] Time to read his posts. There is so much to learn.
[url]http://4stor.com/beta/[/url] [t]http://4stor.com/images/h9Z5.png[/t] Still gotta fix up a lot of stuff under the main headers and the topbar as well.
you seriously need to work on padding and alignment the whole page looks like a mess of annoying colors and misaligned text the whole thing just feels incoherent and random
[QUOTE=Dotmister;36948945]That scrolling just ruins it[/QUOTE] Just realised you can drag the page like you would on a phone or something. Doesn't make it better, just pointing it out.
Just playing around... [img]http://i.imgur.com/QQvuT.png[/img]
[QUOTE=adamjon858;36955345]Just playing around... [img]http://i.imgur.com/QQvuT.png[/img][/QUOTE] at first I was like [img]http://puu.sh/M5qC[/img] and then I was like [img]http://puu.sh/M5r0[/img]
Still a nice looking site. Simple and clean is always good!
[QUOTE=wizard`;36955413]at first I was like [img]http://puu.sh/M5qC[/img] and then I was like [img]http://puu.sh/M5r0[/img][/QUOTE] Hey it beats a lipsum :P
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;36945373]@charliesome #rails #owned[/QUOTE] i don't get how that even happened for starters, rails views aren't like php scripts where a server misconfiguration can just send them without being executed secondly, the angle brackets would have had to be escaped to show up like that
Excuse the link :P it's the only one I had available. [url]http://superbloggers.co.cc/[/url] if you don't wanna click it and think I'm a sketchy mofo then here's a pic... [IMG]http://i49.tinypic.com/2vkd9xu.png[/IMG]
You need to look at better fonts.
eww theres a lot of hinting on that font or its not anti-aliased
The place I work ran a few tests with usertesting.com a couple weeks back and one of the people who did a test for us came back and ordered more stuff. I think that's a good sign.
remade the ".sort" method for lists. it's probably not as fast as .sort, but it's just for js practice. is uses the quicksort method from wikipedia: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicksort[/url] [code]function swap( list, x, y ) { var b = list[y]; list[y] = list[x]; list[x] = b; } function partition( array, iLeft, iRight, iPivot, fn ) { pivotVal = array[iPivot]; swap( array, iPivot, iRight ); storeIndex = iLeft; for ( var i = iLeft; i < iRight; i++ ) { if ( fn( array[i], pivotVal ) ) { swap(array, i, storeIndex); storeIndex += 1; } } swap( array, storeIndex, iRight ); return storeIndex; } function rand( min, max ) { return Math.round(Math.random()*(max-min)) + min; } function quicksort( array, fn, left, right ) { left = left || 0; right = right || array.length-1; if ( left < right ) { var pivotIndex = rand( left, right ); pivotNewIndex = partition( array, left, right, pivotIndex, fn ); quicksort(array, fn, left, pivotNewIndex - 1); quicksort(array, fn, pivotNewIndex + 1, right); } } var l = [-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-100,18,9,12,17,17,17,17,17,13,8,7,11,19,14,16,16,16,16,16,16,6,20,5,10,4,15,3,2,1] quicksort( l, function( a, b ){ return ( a < b ); }); console.log( l ); [/code]
Made quicksort in LiveScript using Prelude some weeks ago. [code]quicksort = fix (quicksort) -> ([pivot, ...rest]) -> | !pivot? => [] | otherwise => [smaller, larger] = (partition (< pivot), rest |> map quicksort) smaller +++ [pivot] +++ larger[/code] Of course, it's not very efficient (Closures, bad pivot), but it's rather compact.
holy crap, it's super compact :o my pivot's pretty bad as well, it's random.
[QUOTE=Hentie;36968211][code]function partition( array, iLeft, iRight, iPivot, fn ) [/code][/QUOTE] suddenly hungarian
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.