What are you working on? v7 - Developers

[QUOTE=kragmars102;35348875][img]http://ezyimg.info/cdn/fH61XV2EQRp.jpg[/img] Apparently the design does not fit a "sticker" company website.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Funcoot;35350822]Wow. Their loss man. [/QUOTE] Yeah, totally their loss. The site looks so fresh, could start use that theme for a software webshop with some small tweakings. Great job!

Working on a homepage design.... [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/70PuG.png[/IMG] Any suggestions??

[QUOTE=adamjon858;35357560]Working on a homepage design.... [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/70PuG.png[/IMG] Any suggestions??[/QUOTE] That is really nice. It's clean, professional and somewhat gives it that nice minimal effect. The content's width should align with the navigation's though, and should also have round corners ( maby 3px ).

The grey box with the text in it should be the entire width of the main body. Then it would just look like a different background rather than a box.

[QUOTE=adamjon858;35357560]Working on a homepage design.... [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/70PuG.png[/IMG] Any suggestions??[/QUOTE] use the space to the right of the header Top Selling Products for something, like how you have done to the right of the Professionals to Aspiring Traders title

Negative margins are so under-rated

Holy shit [url]https://newrelic.com/[/url] is the coolest fucking thing ever.

[QUOTE=kragmars102;35348875][img]http://ezyimg.info/cdn/fH61XV2EQRp.jpg[/img] Apparently the design does not fit a "sticker" company website.[/QUOTE] Looks like Polaroid photos imo

Oh my days I suck at even basic design, any suggestions on how I cam improve on this? [url]http://madeoncoffee.com/html/#[/url] Idea is a blog/forum hybrid where posts that become popular get featured as articles.

212 lines of Java later: [img]http://i.imgur.com/fpw6T.png[/img]

Had nothing to do today so I made this: [t]http://puu.sh/nh0i.png[/t] [url]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21048340/Website/index.html[/url] c&c?

Webkit filters are so awesome: [img]http://i.imgur.com/tQaj2.png[/img]

[QUOTE=Adzter;35372948]Had nothing to do today so I made this: [t]http://puu.sh/nh0i.png[/t] [url]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21048340/Website/index.html[/url] c&c?[/QUOTE] Not too sure on that bar at the top, the "Adzter and Hawx" seems like its too far to the left and the rounded border on the navigation looks wrong Actually the more i look at it, that orange thing just doesn't look right atall. and how are you doing those gradients? they look awfully striped. The fabric background does look nice though and the glowing streaks.

[QUOTE=Spero78;35373358]Not too sure on that bar at the top, the "Adzter and Hawx" seems like its too far to the left and the rounded border on the navigation looks wrong Actually the more i look at it, that orange thing just doesn't look right atall. and how are you doing those gradients? they look awfully striped. The fabric background does look nice though and the glowing streaks.[/QUOTE] Yeah I was thinking that with the background as well, I thought it might have just been my monitor, and I'm using: [css] background-image: linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(58,59,58) 0%, rgb(34,34,34) 100%); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(58,59,58) 0%, rgb(34,34,34) 100%); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(58,59,58) 0%, rgb(34,34,34) 100%); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(58,59,58) 0%, rgb(34,34,34) 100%); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(58,59,58) 0%, rgb(34,34,34) 100%); background-image: -webkit-gradient( linear, left bottom, left top, color-stop(0, rgb(58,59,58)), color-stop(1, rgb(34,34,34)) ); [/css]

Try this, its got slight shades of blue in it but that means there are more colors to draw so there is less striping, also why are you using background-image? [css] background: linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -o-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -webkit-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -ms-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); [/css]

[QUOTE=Spero78;35375041]Try this, its got slight shades of blue in it but that means there are more colors to draw so there is less striping, [b]also why are you using background-image[/B]? [css] background: linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -o-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -moz-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -webkit-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); background: -ms-linear-gradient(bottom, rgb(49,52,53) 0%, rgb(33,37,40) 100%); [/css][/QUOTE] It was a friend that thought me about css3 graidents and he told me that it's better to use background-image, I'll ask him why, thinking about it, I don't see how it would, and thanks for the help.

[QUOTE=Adzter;35375516]It was a friend that thought me about css3 graidents and he told me that it's better to use background-image, I'll ask him why, thinking about it, I don't see how it would, and thanks for the help.[/QUOTE] After thinking about it, using background-image is probably a good idea because if your browser doesn't support gradients then it will use background-color

[img]http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4038/andrewmcwatterscomr38.png[/img] I produced something today, but I'm not sure what direction to take it right now, so I think I'll hold back for a short while and then finish it up tomorrow or something.

[QUOTE=amcfaggot;35376985][img]http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4038/andrewmcwatterscomr38.png[/img] I produced something today, but I'm not sure what direction to take it right now, so I think I'll hold back for a short while and then finish it up tomorrow or something.[/QUOTE] Use those notes as buttons/images.

I like that background. How'd ya do it?

Four passes of shapes lens blurred at 100px radius thrice, 1 pass of monochromatic circles, 1 pass of my choice of color palleted circles, 1 pass over everything using monochromatic circles again, and a final pass with the same color pallet. Each layer is something like 10% or 25% opacity, and I do this all over a black background due to the less saturated scheme. Though you can choose vivid colors and start with an equally vivid color as your background. This will create something more lively than what I've done. The result I got with the color scheme I used was something blandish and calm. [url]http://www.colourlovers.com/palette/490780/The_First_Raindrop[/url] [editline]faux-automerge[/editline] There's basically a lot of blurring going on to create something worse looking in visual reproduction than traditional synthetic radial or polygonal bokeh.

finally looking at my google analytics stuff, shit [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/rzbLC.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/BxSvv.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=jaybuz;35377299]I like that background. How'd ya do it?[/QUOTE] do NOT encourage him that background is awful i'm not trying to be a dick but god dammit its so bad its spastic and uneven and leaves too much uncovered, and the parts that are affected are way too heavy

[QUOTE=Kopimi;35379428]do NOT encourage him that background is awful i'm not trying to be a dick but god dammit its so bad its spastic and uneven and leaves too much uncovered, and the parts that are affected are way too heavy[/QUOTE] That's pretty rich coming from someone who makes shitty designs.

[QUOTE=Jelly;35379840]That's incredibly arrogant coming from someone who makes mediocre designs. Get off your high horse.[/QUOTE] uhhhh okayyy apparently being brash and up-front about bad designs is only acceptable if you're not bashing a regular of the thread? i'm not on a high horse, i'm just saying what i honestly think of the background. it's distracting and unpleasant to look at, it's a good concept that has been overdone to the point of it being a negative aspect of the site. i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings but i talked to andrew on steam about this and he knows i'm not being a cunt, i just honestly think it's a bad background and i felt like it was worth posting that in reply to him [B]asking for criticism[/B] not sure where your passive aggressive "u make shit designs" thing is coming from either, seeing as how i can't remember many instances of you criticizing my designs in the past. [editline]1st April 2012[/editline] its too late to edit your post jelly the truth is out

[QUOTE=Kopimi;35379887]uhhhh okayyy apparently being brash and up-front about bad designs is only acceptable if you're not bashing a regular of the thread? i'm not on a high horse, i'm just saying what i honestly think of the background. it's distracting and unpleasant to look at, it's a good concept that has been overdone to the point of it being a negative aspect of the site. i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings but i talked to andrew on steam about this and he knows i'm not being a cunt, i just honestly think it's a bad background and i felt like it was worth posting that in reply to him [B]asking for criticism[/B] not sure where your passive aggressive "u make shit designs" thing is coming from either, seeing as how i can't remember many instances of you criticizing my designs in the past. [editline]1st April 2012[/editline] its too late to edit your post jelly the truth is out[/QUOTE] It's called not being an asshole. If I flat out tell someone "it sucks, start over" it's completely different than saying "it could be improved, but it has potential". They're both versions of saying the same thing, one's being a massive cunt, the other, not so much. You're acting as if it's the worst thing you've ever seen, it's really not that bad. It'll look completely different once it's full of content.

[QUOTE=Jelly;35380036]It's called not being an asshole. If I flat out tell someone "it sucks, start over" it's completely different to saying "it could be improved, but it has potential". They're both versions of saying the same thing, one's being a massive cunt, the other, not so much. You're acting as if it's the worst thing you've ever seen, it's really not that bad. It'll look completely different once it's full of content.[/QUOTE] i don't get it, even if it looks like total shit i'm an asshole for not saying "well.. it looks really nice right now but you know what'd make it better??" yeah unfortunately i don't think it looks good at all right now, and i said WHY i think it looks bad too. and apparently i'm not the only one who thinks so either. andrew is a big boy and he knows i don't mean it in a bad way, i think he can handle having someone tell him flat out that they don't like the design, rather than giving him a pat on the back for a solid effort while they try their best not to reveal how bad they really think it is.

wow nj guys your poopoo posts are worse than my background

here's a much more monolithic view of the same lighting [img]http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/8995/andrewmcwatterscomr40.png[/img]

[QUOTE=amcfaggot;35381480]here's a much more monolithic view of the same lighting [img]http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/8995/andrewmcwatterscomr40.png[/img][/QUOTE] You should design content first, not appearance. [editline]1st April 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Kopimi;35379887]i'm just saying what i honestly think of the background. it's distracting and unpleasant to look at, it's a good concept that has been overdone to the point of it being a negative aspect of the site.[/QUOTE] Then what you say is "[B]I think[/B] it's distracting and unpleasant to look at". That is only what you think, and it makes quite a deal of difference. However agreeable upon your opinion is, stating a thing as fact and in an aggressive way is bound to spawn a shitstorm.