[QUOTE=Fizzadar;36399096]bcrypt > SHA family: [url]http://throwingfire.com/storing-passwords-securely/#notpasswordhashes[/url][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;36401983]bcrypt go[/QUOTE]
Got it :v:
Btw, I asked my webhoster to enable mysqli and he did! Such a nice guy.
[QUOTE=Darkwater124;36402228]Got it :v:
Btw, I asked my webhoster to enable mysqli and he did! Such a nice guy.[/QUOTE]
Great now ask him to disable php
I wrote a log viewer for SRCDS with Flask and Python.
I absolutely love Python.
[b]Edit:[/b]
[img]http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/6/17020094617-orig.png[/img]
[b][i]Damn automerge![/b][/i]
automerge broke
Automerge hates time
[QUOTE=Darkwater124;36398451]Yeah, I meant hash.
Fuck, my webhoster doesn't have mysqli..[/QUOTE]
get a better web host
[QUOTE=TerabyteS_;36403796]Great now ask him to disable php[/QUOTE]
Even after playing with RoR, I must say, deployment and even development is simpler in PHP.
Thing about PHP, if you want to make something quick and small, it takes you a second.
Contrary to that, if you want to make something quick and small in RoR, it will take much much longer.
Also, PHP has the power to create big things, sure, it's not as scalable as RoR, but it still cuts the job.
Lastly, really, I would use RoR if they really made the deployment as simple as PHPs, or heck, at least simpler than it is now. I don't want a god damn VPS to host my websites, just give me a shared webhost in which I could simply upload the files and it will do everything else automatically.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36410403]Even after playing with RoR, I must say, deployment and even development is simpler in PHP.
Thing about PHP, if you want to make something quick and small, it takes you a second.
Contrary to that, if you want to make something quick and small in RoR, it will take much much longer.[/QUOTE]
I'm using RoR and I'm not sure how it makes anything longer... it should actually speed up the process as you know where is what and there is no doubt about it. ( Or shouldn't be if you correctly separated everything. )
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36410403]Even after playing with RoR, I must say, deployment and even development is simpler in PHP.
Thing about PHP, if you want to make something quick and small, it takes you a second.
Contrary to that, if you want to make something quick and small in RoR, it will take much much longer.
Also, PHP has the power to create big things, sure, it's not as scalable as RoR, but it still cuts the job.
Lastly, really, I would use RoR if they really made the deployment as simple as PHPs, or heck, at least simpler than it is now. I don't want a god damn VPS to host my websites, just give me a shared webhost in which I could simply upload the files and it will do everything else automatically.[/QUOTE]
Heroku.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36410403]Even after playing with RoR, I must say, deployment and even development is simpler in PHP.
Thing about PHP, if you want to make something quick and small, it takes you a second.
Contrary to that, if you want to make something quick and small in RoR, it will take much much longer.
Also, PHP has the power to create big things, sure, it's not as scalable as RoR, but it still cuts the job.
Lastly, really, I would use RoR if they really made the deployment as simple as PHPs, or heck, at least simpler than it is now. I don't want a god damn VPS to host my websites, just give me a shared webhost in which I could simply upload the files and it will do everything else automatically.[/QUOTE]
i can deploy by typing 'rake deploy' into my terminal, that's easier than php imo
[editline]20th June 2012[/editline]
also you wouldn't use rails to make something quick and small that's retarded
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36410403]Even after playing with RoR, I must say, deployment and even development is simpler in PHP.
Thing about PHP, if you want to make something quick and small, it takes you a second.
Contrary to that, if you want to make something quick and small in RoR, it will take much much longer.
Also, PHP has the power to create big things, sure, it's not as scalable as RoR, but it still cuts the job.
Lastly, really, I would use RoR if they really made the deployment as simple as PHPs, or heck, at least simpler than it is now. I don't want a god damn VPS to host my websites, just give me a shared webhost in which I could simply upload the files and it will do everything else automatically.[/QUOTE]
Although, I believe there are alternatives to RoR which are precisely suited for 'quick and small', such as [URL="http://www.sinatrarb.com/"]Sinatra[/URL] for example.
Also, [URL="http://www.heroku.com/"]Heroku[/URL]?
[editline]20th June 2012[/editline]
I think in most of the cases when people say "This is not good enough" it's because they didn't look hard enough.
The problem is not RoR. RoR is an amazing tool and really, I would definitely use it.
But you all missed the main point of my post - the deployment. Sure, Turb, you say you can deploy it with a simple "rake deploy". But as I already said, I don't want a terminal to deploy something, I just want to [B]upload the files and then the webhost should take care of the rest[/B].
Pissing around with a VPS is additional time wasted when you could develop the website itself in that time.
God forbid you type a command instead of manually transferring your files! You're aware that no mature startup operates like this? I think they need to get code out more rapidly than you.
[QUOTE=Jelly;36411107]God forbid you type a command instead of manually transferring your files! You're aware that no mature startup operates like this? I think they need to get code out more rapidly than you.[/QUOTE]
That's not the point. You first must own a VPS or a dedi which:
1) Costs more than than a shared webhost for proper specs
2) Requires lots of maintenance. You basically don't need any maintenance for a shared webhost because everything is done for you.
3) For new guys, you must learn all the subtleties of Linux, the commands, etc. You must learn quite a lot before you create proper, secure, stable VPS/dedi which will hold your websites.
P.S.: I still Web Development is still as childish as it ever was when I started doing web dev 3 years ago.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36411557]That's not the point. You first must own a VPS or a dedi which:
1) Costs more than than a shared webhost for proper specs
2) Requires lots of maintenance. You basically don't need any maintenance for a shared webhost because everything is done for you.
3) For new guys, you must learn all the subtleties of Linux, the commands, etc. You must learn quite a lot before you create proper, secure, stable VPS/dedi which will hold your websites.
P.S.: I still Web Development is still as childish as it ever was when I started doing web dev 3 years ago.[/QUOTE]
And this all comes under "Learning to use your tools". You're going to need to know this eventually, why not learn it now?
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36410629]
Pissing around with a VPS is additional time wasted when you could develop the website itself in that time.[/QUOTE]
Pissing around arguing about it on a forum is additional time wasted when you could be learning the shit you're whining about having to learn in that time.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36411557]That's not the point. You first must own a VPS or a dedi which:
1) Costs more than than a shared webhost for proper specs
2) Requires lots of maintenance. You basically don't need any maintenance for a shared webhost because everything is done for you.
3) For new guys, you must learn all the subtleties of Linux, the commands, etc. You must learn quite a lot before you create proper, secure, stable VPS/dedi which will hold your websites.
P.S.: I still Web Development is still as childish as it ever was when I started doing web dev 3 years ago.[/QUOTE]
Heroku has been suggested twice, which solves the need for a server and maintenance. Also VPS' are cheap as hell, hexxeh and fanatical offer super cheap servers that rival shared hosting.
Yor all rong everyon use cold fusion
[QUOTE=adboe websit]Adobe® ColdFusion® application server enables developers to [b]rapid[/b]ly build, deploy, and maintain Java™–EE applications for the enterprise.[/QUOTE]
se?
[URL="http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion-family.html"]http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion-family.html[/URL]
[IMG]http://niggaupload.com/images/9DMCW.jpg[/IMG]
I much prefer coffeescriptnodejsmongodbredismemcacheserver.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36411557]That's not the point. You first must own a VPS or a dedi which:
1) Costs more than than a shared webhost for proper specs
2) Requires lots of maintenance. You basically don't need any maintenance for a shared webhost because everything is done for you.
3) For new guys, you must learn all the subtleties of Linux, the commands, etc. You must learn quite a lot before you create proper, secure, stable VPS/dedi which will hold your websites.
P.S.: I still Web Development is still as childish as it ever was when I started doing web dev 3 years ago.[/QUOTE]
Those are all basic and essential skills required of a web developer, in any remotely serious shop or company. If a job in this industry isn't your goal, you can keep using PHP, Filezilla for file transfers and shared environments. Even if you work in a PHP shop you'll need to have at least basic/average linux knowledge.
[QUOTE=StinkyJoe;36412741]Those are all basic and essential skills required of a web developer, in any remotely serious shop or company. If a job in this industry isn't your goal, you can keep using PHP, Filezilla for file transfers and shared environments. Even if you work in a PHP shop you'll need to have at least basic/average linux knowledge.[/QUOTE]
Is linux knowledge really a necessity? I don't really have any and haven't had any problems, but then again I don't really do 'web design' in the traditional sense and hardly any of the sites I run are actually on Linux (in such a way that you can access a linux terminal).
[QUOTE=StinkyJoe;36412741]Those are all basic and essential skills required of a web developer, in any remotely serious shop or company. If a job in this industry isn't your goal, you can keep using PHP, Filezilla for file transfers and shared environments. Even if you work in a PHP shop you'll need to have at least basic/average linux knowledge.[/QUOTE]
As I pointed out, "for new guys". I've played around quite a bit with VPS' and virtual machines.. I have enough experience in that field now to feel reassured in Linux.
Lastly, my goal is software or games programming. For me web development is just a beginning as I plan to study Computer Science next year.
I hope to work as a web developer during the years I will be studying CS mostly to pay the bills and really do something does interest me.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36414498]As I pointed out, "for new guys".[/QUOTE]
As numerous people have pointed out "heroku".
[QUOTE=spidersdesign;36412868]Is linux knowledge really a necessity? I don't really have any and haven't had any problems, but then again I don't really do 'web design' in the traditional sense and hardly any of the sites I run are actually on Linux (in such a way that you can access a linux terminal).[/QUOTE]
You cannot host a serious application on shared hosting.
[img]http://images.devs-on.net/Image/Xdfj5fX4Tvcuzd9l-Region.png[/img]
Too much orange?
[QUOTE=/dev/sda1;36418435][img]http://images.devs-on.net/Image/Xdfj5fX4Tvcuzd9l-Region.png[/img]
Too much orange?[/QUOTE]
I think it looks quite nice with the exception of the offline text, it really bugs me that its a slightly different colour.
[QUOTE=KmartSqrl;36415054]As numerous people have pointed out "heroku".[/QUOTE]
Not sure what that has to do with the post you quoted..
[img]http://images.devs-on.net/Image/pe2N0JO0naVjv3p1-Region.png[/img]
Removed colored status text.
[QUOTE=Crhem van der B;36420775]Not sure what that has to do with the post you quoted..[/QUOTE]
Heroku is for new guys and people who don't want to/can't maintain their own server.
[QUOTE=/dev/sda1;36420853][img]http://images.devs-on.net/Image/pe2N0JO0naVjv3p1-Region.png[/img]Removed colored status text.[/QUOTE]I'm sorry but I don't really like any of it. The banner feels too thick and the padding is inconsistent. I don't feel the background works with the rest of the design either. Also I'm not crazy about the orangey-red colour as there is too much of it.
If I was personally changing it I'd:
- Make the main container not have rounded corners.
- Make the main bar thinner.
- Make all the text smaller and possibly look at some other fonts.
- Not have full stops in the buttons (assuming they are buttons?)
- Make the padding more consistent.
- Change the background.
Sorry if I seem harsh but just wanted to try and be constructive.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
