[QUOTE=jmazouri;33382703]The dropdowns are a bit ugly, and the fonts a bit boring when compared to the header font, but other than that it's very nice.[/QUOTE]
Fonts will be changed.
I agree the drop-down looks ugly, but I'm not sure how to properly format it.
Thanks!
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;33382598]Almost done: [url]http://riviaro.com/[/url]
Feedback please![/QUOTE]
That header logo is far too sharp, it needs re-doing
[url]www.riviaro.com[/url]
It's nearing completion.
Final C&C?
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;33398072][url]www.riviaro.com[/url]
It's nearing completion.
Final C&C?[/QUOTE]
Most of it is good, but I really hate the background image, can you try and get something a bit more high-res? how about this:
[img]http://subtlepatterns.com/patterns/dark_wood.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Alcapwne;33398145]Most of it is good, but I really hate the background image, can you try and get something a bit more high-res? how about this:
[img]http://subtlepatterns.com/patterns/dark_wood.png[/img][/QUOTE]
Too low-res?
Really?
It's a 1920x1200 background image. Maybe the compression was too high, but I doubt it.
[editline]23rd November 2011[/editline]
OK, it's slightly higher-res now, but 3x larger.
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;33398386]Too low-res?
Really?
It's a 1920x1200 background image. Maybe the compression was too high, but I doubt it.
[editline]23rd November 2011[/editline]
OK, it's slightly higher-res now, but 3x larger.[/QUOTE]
I think the image itself is just a bit blurry, which is what he's talking about. Also, why is your logo 1273x980?
[QUOTE=jmazouri;33399529]I think the image itself is just a bit blurry, which is what he's talking about. Also, why is your logo 1273x980?[/QUOTE]
The original background image is 1.77MB, but sharp.
Also, my 'graphic designer' is just another student who does all his work in powerpoint/word, so I get these weird sized images.
[url]http://f.37b.dk/blog[/url]
Okay so I have completely changed my site from before. There is no longer any flash. It is all HTML, CSS, and Javascript. I designed it completely myself. Be warned there may be some spelling mistakes.
[URL="http://boxvader.com/"]http://boxvader.com/[/URL]
[QUOTE=boxvader;33410568]Okay so I have completely changed my site from before. There is no longer any flash. It is all HTML, CSS, and Javascript. I designed it completely myself. Be warned there may be some spelling mistakes.
[URL="http://boxvader.com/"]http://boxvader.com/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Err, I don't mean to rain on your parade:
[t]http://puu.sh/9dGO[/t]
[QUOTE=toaster468;33410683]Err, I don't mean to rain on your parade:
[t]http://puu.sh/9dGO[/t][/QUOTE]
Hmm... Strange My computer displays it fine. Well that is the reason I posted on here is to see if there were any problems
What browser are you using? I am using chrome, and it's all across the page.
Also this might fix your issue.
[code]<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
[/code]
Add this above the <html> tag.
And change this
[code]BODY { background: url(http://boxvader.com/home2.png); background-repeat: no-repeat }[/code]
to:
[code]BODY { background: black url(http://boxvader.com/home2.png) 50% 50% no-repeat; }[/code]
[QUOTE=kragmars102;33411036]What browser are you using? I am using chrome, and it's all across the page.
Also this might fix your issue.
[code]<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
[/code]
Add this above the <html> tag.
And change this
[code]BODY { background: url(http://boxvader.com/home2.png); background-repeat: no-repeat }[/code]
to:
[code]BODY { background: black url(http://boxvader.com/home2.png) 50% 50% no-repeat; }[/code][/QUOTE]
I am using chrome as well. I have also tested it on Firefox IE and safari all have looked fine for me.
Thanks I changed that part.
^ also you don't have an html container, nevermind the doctype.
also you shouldnt be using center tags
[QUOTE=anton;33411475]also you shouldnt be using center tags[/QUOTE]
Okay should I use CSS instead to align things?
Sorry I am still learning this stuff.
[QUOTE=boxvader;33412061]Okay should I use CSS instead to align things?
Sorry I am still learning this stuff.[/QUOTE]
yes, and using an image background to have the site layout is a bad idea, use and style divs
[QUOTE=kragmars102;33412310][code]<style type="text/css">
body{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background: black;
font: 13px/18px "Lucida Sans Unicode", "Lucida Grande", Arial, sans-serif;
}
div#container{
width: 700px;
background:#393939;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0 auto;
min-height: 415px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
margin-top: 100px;
border-top: 1px solid #585858;
}
div#container span{
width: 680px;
margin: 10px;
min-height: 280px;
background: #161616;
float: left;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
div#container span img{
width: 660px;
margin: 10px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
div#thumbs{
width: 700px;
height: 120px;
padding: 10px;
background:#1a1a1a;
border-top: 1px solid #313131;
margin: 0 auto;
margin-top: 20px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
</style>
<div id="container">
<span>
<img src="http://boxvader.com/vfx3.png" />
</span>
</div>
<div id="thumbs"></div>[/code]
Something basic to get you started off, sorry for the long stack of code.
[img]http://beztdesigns.com/i/cdn/ZQ3GZTIU.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Okay, I updated it with CSS.
I adapted your code some.
It definitely looks much better to me.
[url]www.scottdbdesigns.com[/url]
[QUOTE=Glitchman;33487421][url]www.scottdbdesigns.com[/url][/QUOTE]
Looking pretty good, only thing I can think of is maybe changing the background for something a little less distracting. It would probably look good in a light shade of gray with some subtle noise.
Other than that I think something to separate the content from the navigation would work wonders.
Yeah. There are a lot of Flash haters, but I'm applying to flash jobs specifically so I wanted my site to show I can actionscript and design/animate in it pretty well.
[QUOTE=Glitchman;33494265]Yeah. There are a lot of Flash haters, but I'm applying to flash jobs specifically so I wanted my site to show I can actionscript and design/animate in it pretty well.[/QUOTE]
You can still get paid to do flash? jesus fucking christ.
your website takes over 5 seconds to load even after I've cached it, what gives?
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;33496204]You can still get paid to do flash? jesus fucking christ.
your website takes over 5 seconds to load even after I've cached it, what gives?[/QUOTE]
I still do on a regular basis
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;33496204]You can still get paid to do flash? jesus fucking christ.
your website takes over 5 seconds to load even after I've cached it, what gives?[/QUOTE]
You can still get paid (generously) to write COBOL, actually. And while flash as an embedded plugin will die off soon (How soon? Certainly not within the next two to five years.), Adobe is making some (somewhat promising) progress towards Flash>HTML5 integration (HTML5 being a blanket term for the new/improved stuff we're seeing pop-up), so it might not be the death of Flash as a development platform.
With that said, you're going to be hard-pressed to find a job involving Flash that doesn't have you exclusively fixing old code - not to mention all the "flash doesn't work on the web" points we've gone over way too many times already.
I've gotten paid to do two flash e-cards for law firms this month haha
flash could've taken over the web if adobe had focused more on embracing both programmers and designers, rather than one or the other
It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if flash builder and AS3 and all the new niceties had come out a few years earlier.
[url]http://www.vdgamingnetwork.net/[/url] --I updated the layout but still working on it
[url]http://www.michaelcamesao.site40.net/[/url] --Still working on
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
