[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5013896/forum/Facepunch/Programming/What%27s%20Your%20Color%20Scheme/devenv_2016-10-28_16-41-56.png[/img]
I haven't seen a need to change it from VS's defaults so far. I used orange operators for a while, but it doesn't make a significant difference for me to miss it.
[t]http://odin.prfn.se/u/scheme.png[/t]
currently using [url]http://spacemacs.org[/url] default colorscheme, was using solarized dark in vim earlier, but switched to this as i liked it quite a bit.
[QUOTE=brianosaur;51261148]this is my colorscheme, at least for javascript.
it is called gruvbox, available here: [url]https://github.com/morhetz/gruvbox[/url]
it is supposed to look like this:
[img]https://camo.githubusercontent.com/2fcf604967167347f15ca8be125d32b18db9bc28/687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f476b496c38466e2e706e67[/img]
but it looks like this in terminal only, macvim looks perfect because it supports 256 colors.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/I0LxU1P.png[/img]
vim + terminal colors don't really play well together.[/QUOTE]
You can fix this by making some edits to your .bashrc, google it
I know what your talking about, it still doesn't look right when I set terminal to 256 colors. Terminal doesn't support 256, only 16. I've heard some work arounds but I think you have to change color value tables in some file, but nobody ever is specific where that file is or how to do it. They just give you the values and say change them
I've spent hours doing this
[t]http://i.imgur.com/rpGqNjg.png[/t]
[URL="https://github.com/tyrannicaltoucan/vim-quantum"]Quantum[/URL] in VIM. Usually default syntax in everything else. [sp]kindly ignore the shitty code[/sp]
Seti-UI + atom material dark syntax
[T]http://i.imgur.com/s4X2Z9W.png[/T]
I have no idea why so many people use dark schemes - it hurts my eyes unless I'm in unlit room.
[QUOTE=suXin;51277941]I have no idea why so many people use dark schemes - it hurts my eyes unless I'm in unlit room.[/QUOTE]
Because bright themes hurt my eyes
Bright themes (actually anything bright) would hurt my eyes too if I were working in the dark, how many of you work in such conditions?
[QUOTE=suXin;51278055]Bright themes (actually anything bright) would hurt my eyes too if I were working in the dark, how many of you work in such conditions?[/QUOTE]
There is no direct sun in my thesis office.
I also live in a country where the winters are long.
[QUOTE=suXin;51278055]Bright themes (actually anything bright) would hurt my eyes too if I were working in the dark, how many of you work in such conditions?[/QUOTE]
I don't usually work in the dark. And if I work at night I work with my lights on
[IMG]https://my.mixtape.moe/zhwpnn.png[/IMG]
Paper theme. Blurry fonts on a dark background flat out suck now.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/GGxOTTv.png[/IMG]
Nice dark theme, Monokai + some modifications with
np++ hello kitty theme
[editline]29th October 2016[/editline]
[thumb]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/13397008/10-29-2016%206-34-23%20PM.png[/thumb]
[IMG]http://nabile.s-ul.eu/mxd04bGi.png[/IMG]
I'm using [URL="http://blog.ppy.sh/post/9498776779/coding-in-colour"]peppy's color scheme[/URL] on MonoDevelop.
[IMG]http://web.archive.org/web/20150625195940im_/http://puu.sh/4SMi[/IMG]
Looks like the original links are down, even with web archive, though.
[QUOTE=eirexe;51286250]spacemacs-dark
[t]https://i.imgur.com/xQU5TZs.png[/t][/QUOTE]
Do you find that emacs increases your workflow? I've considered using emacs or vim if the productivity gain is that great but from posts I've read it pretty much states that it takes way too long to get comfortable with it to make a difference.
[QUOTE=Proclivitas;51292340]Do you find that emacs increases your workflow? I've considered using emacs or vim if the productivity gain is that great but from posts I've read it pretty much states that it takes way too long to get comfortable with it to make a difference.[/QUOTE]
I'm a vim user, but only switched about a year ago because my entire team uses vim. At first it was scary because I would see my co workers fly around the screen like mad man but after a few weeks of figuring out how to work in vim, things are really smooth.
It will definitely take you a while to get used to the commands, and you will most likely find yourself modifying your .vimrc to remap commands that work better with your personal workflow. It will be frustrating going from textmate, atom, or whatever ide you use to vim or emacs, but if you keep forcing yourself to use vim/emacs, you will adjust.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/MA66ijb.png[/IMG]
Sublime3 with Material theme and sidebar enhancements.
[QUOTE=Proclivitas;51292340]Do you find that emacs increases your workflow? I've considered using emacs or vim if the productivity gain is that great but from posts I've read it pretty much states that it takes way too long to get comfortable with it to make a difference.[/QUOTE]
Yes, I use spacemacs because it comes with a bunch of stuff built in.
[QUOTE=Proclivitas;51292340]Do you find that emacs increases your workflow? I've considered using emacs or vim if the productivity gain is that great but from posts I've read it pretty much states that it takes way too long to get comfortable with it to make a difference.[/QUOTE]
The reason it takes "way too long" to get comfortable with it is because it takes a while to finally make that groove in your seat. It takes them way too long because they want efficiency to be instant; who can blame them? Don't let a bunch of posts tell you it's a bad idea. Try them for yourself and see if either of them is right for you.
[editline]And[/editline]
Blog snippet describing the above:
[QUOTE]
I’ve tried Emacs on and off since then, figuring out why people would use it. It certainly wasn’t the bindings C-f, C-b, C-n, and C-p doing any favors. Vim also reeked of nasty staunches so in the meantime, I stuck with nvi. It was plain but it worked.
## Enter the Parentheses…
Tricks of Emacs spread around the Web. The idea of Evil was a pleasant idea judging that I’ve already made almost everything else go hjkling around the place. I’ve given Spacemacs a whirl and even that just felt… wrong.
Emacs is already a complicated system. Why make it even more complicated with Spacemacs’s own layers? I would say that going in to Emacs without a starters’ kit is the best idea. It’s the best way you can learn the Emacs Lisp to configure from the ground up. The entire reason you’re even using it is for the expansion. People use Emacs the Environment. You use it to bend it to your whim and to make any task involved in editing easier. Anyone just using Emacs the Editor would be better off using mg.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
