• "Where Did the Towers Go?" - Lasers vaporized the twin towers
    203 replies, posted
[img]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_GC4zlPbEl0o/S65LShm5hvI/AAAAAAAAOCM/8AcZ-pwJ5gk/51izk7qE-DL__SS500_.jpg[/img] [quote] Over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining “why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,” the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither the standard view–that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire–nor the standard opposition view–that they were intentionally detonated by “thermite explosives”– explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. “Where Did the Towers Go?” provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood’s disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.[/quote] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPXcoqrCBvw&feature=player_embedded[/media] That's right folks, we may not know if it was done by the government, we may not know if the planes were holograms in the sky, but one thing we DO know, is that the twin towers were disintegrated by laser beams. Thanks to the brilliant findings of this crazy cunt, Doctor Judy Wood! [img]http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/DSC04297_sbcc2cc.jpg[/img] [I]Doctor indeed. [/I]She has brought forward new evidence, that infallibly claims that the towers were hit by an energy weapon, similar to the ones Nikola Tesla had been conceiving in the later years of his life (the years where you could very safely describe him as a mad scientist). She has photo evidence that the towers were actually[I][B]dematerialized! [/B][/I]Thousands of tons of concrete and metal were turned to dust in an instant! Now some of you so called "logical" people may ask questions like; "How could somebody have built a weapon that powerful and kept it secret?" "Where would the weapon have been located? And what kind of delivery method was used to destroy the towers?" "Why are you such a crazy fuck?" Now just because Dr. Wood hasn't been able to give a solid answer to any of those questions in any interviews or statements, it doesn't change the fact that she's right. Just look at all the evidence she's managed to gather up! -Where was the thud? A several thousand ton building falling down must have caused a thud, right? Nobody felt the heavy impact of the building falling down on the ground. Sure there may have been a several second tremor that shook everything near it, [B]BUT THAT'S NOT A THUD.[/B] -We also didn't hear the thud either. There was no sound. Other than all the wrenching metal and concrete and stuff. No sound at all. -There was [url=https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/WTC-Debrie2083.jpg]minimal rubble.[/url] -Metal melting heat would have been created by a building imploding, right? So why was there not a river of lava boiling everything at ground zero. I mean [I]come on[/I], that's pretty obvious. Clearly this book truly is: [quote=Eric Larsen Ph.D. ]...the most important book of the twenty-first century.[/quote] To see more on this amazing book, visit the book's website! [url]http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/about/[/url] For the real meat and potatoes look at the review: [quote]In the story of 9/11 as told by Dr. Wood, everything is observed, analyzed, and evaluated for [I]exactly what it is[/I], and therefore almost nothing is the way we have been [I]told[/I] it was. Readers will find for themselves Dr. Wood’s proof that the extremely minimal amount of rubble (the hurried shipping of mass amounts of steel to China is a falsehood and red herring) left behind after the disappearance of the towers indicates that the vast tonnage of these enormous buildings [I]never did reach the ground[/I] but instead, through a process of molecular dissociation (Glossary: “Molecules separate or even repel each other”), the buildings’ mass was turned to dust in a shorter time than would have been required for that same mass, in solid form, to have reached earth.[/quote] [quote] Dr. Wood is a highly gifted observer of multitudinous varieties of evidence—manifestations of evidence that she looks at[I] for what they are, not for what others may have suggested, said, hinted, or believed they are[/I]. Here are the opening five sentences of Dr. Wood’s Introduction: On 9/11, I realized that what was being seen and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. I remember watching the TV in the faculty conference room. The TV kept playing the same film over and over, showing what appeared to be a building unraveling like a sweater. I had never seen a building unravel like a sweater, and I tried to imagine what was going on that might make it look that way. Certainly the time it took the building to go away did not make sense. This is the same independent, thoughtful observer who has studied literally thousands upon thousands of images from 9/11, noticing things that others might miss entirely. On the broad expanse of ground zero, for example, “believed” to have had a lake of molten steel underneath it, Dr. Wood notices rubber hoses lying around, and puddles of water, the hoses not melting, the water not boiling or even steaming. Workers are seen walking around on this same expanse—and they are [I]not[/I] being cooked like fricassees. [/quote] [quote]Many of the “jumpers,” Dr. Wood observes, seem to be [I]trying to take off their clothes[/I], sometimes even as they are already in free-fall toward the street below. It may be, she suggests, that they are in a reflexive reaction against a pain comparable to that experienced by inadvertently placing one’s hand on a hot burner. One’s response in that case is instinctive and wholly involuntary, like people’s responses when they are hit by [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_uWaXiECkM"]“active denial” micro-wave weaponry[/URL], which may quite possibly have been akin to the “directed energy” force those in the towers were being subjected to when they became what we now call “jumpers.”[/quote][B][/B] [img]http://drjudywood.com/wtc/pics/Spire2m_ss.jpg[/img] [I]PHOTO PROOF OF THE METAL DEMATERIALIZING! [/I] [B]Now is the chance for you to WAKE UP to what [I]REALLY [/I]happened![/B]
Just when I think people can't be any dumber. Also memory serving Tesla's "death ray" designs involved a focused beam of energy (essentially a highly directional variation of his famous "Tesla coils") that would electrocute anything it touched causing it to combust, not really dematerialize. They were also fairly plausible, whereas this "theory" isn't. Although they are both just rumors.
These conspiracy theories get more insulting each time I hear them.
[QUOTE=mooman1080;34569932]These conspiracy theories get more paranoid and moronic each time I hear them.[/QUOTE] Fixed that for you, my good man.
[QUOTE=KarloMcMarlo;34570034]Fixed that for you, my good man.[/QUOTE] Both terms make sense. These "theorists" are an insult to every citizen of their respective countries and the memories of everyone who died that day.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;34570041]Both terms make sense. These "theorists" are an insult to every citizen of their country and the memories of everyone who died that day.[/QUOTE] Pff what are you talking about. There's nothing insulting about saying people who jumped from the tower to escape the pain of being crushed to death were actually trying to strip themselves because they were getting hit by laser beams.
I respect freedom of speech, but as a New Yorker people need to stop with the 9/11 conspiracy theory bullshit
[QUOTE=The Vman;34569909][img]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_GC4zlPbEl0o/S65LShm5hvI/AAAAAAAAOCM/8AcZ-pwJ5gk/51izk7qE-DL__SS500_.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] for a moment there I thought it said by John Woo and thought what a cool new movie
I am now enlightened.
What will these people think up next? Osama Bin Laden is still alive. His soul had been placed in the body of a giant man eating chicken which now plays host to it.
[QUOTE=UntouchedShadow;34570126]What will these people think up next? Osama Bin Laden is still alive. His soul had been placed in the body of a giant man eating chicken which now plays host to it.[/QUOTE] Giant chicken, you say? [IMG]http://sharetv.org/images/family_guy/cast/large/ernie_the_giant_chicken.jpg[/IMG] oh god we're fucked.
[QUOTE=KarloMcMarlo;34570154]Giant chicken, you say? [IMG]http://sharetv.org/images/family_guy/cast/large/ernie_the_giant_chicken.jpg[/IMG] oh god we're fucked.[/QUOTE] My god, it all makes sense now!
If the towers weren't disintegrated by lasers why aren't they still standing there? DR. JUDY WOOD = 1 YOU = 0
I know conspiracy theories tend to be a bit nonsensical but this is just flatout insulting.
"How I define Directed Energy Weapons is energy that is directed, and used as a weapon" Who needs Oxford's dictionary when we have this bitch
The kicker is that I heard about this on the hilarious ultra right wing radio station here. And the host was actually giving this woman [I]merit.[/I] [QUOTE=Paul McCartney;34570699]"How I define Directed Energy Weapons is energy that is directed, and used as a weapon" Who needs Oxford's dictionary when we have this bitch[/QUOTE] Putting her PhD to good use.
Out of interest, what is Dr Wood's area of study? I'm skeptical of her qualifications.
I don't even fucking know.
Holy fucking shit Expunge mankind. Expunge. [I]everyone.[/I]
*singsong voice* [I]I think [B]someone [/B]needs to get laid![/I]
[url]http://www.drjudywood.com/[/url] uhhh I think she's bit of a fanatic. Edit: Her qualifications according to her website: [quote] Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials) Strength of Materials Testing[/quote]
[QUOTE=KarloMcMarlo;34570034]Fixed that for you, my good man.[/QUOTE] No, I like mooman1080's term better. "Insulting," because we have who knows how many dozens if not [I]hundreds[/I] of crackpots like this(Alex Jones, David Icke, this stupid cunt on top of many others) who are belittling suffering of thousands who lost loved ones on 9/11, with their crank conspiracy theories. I think someone who lost a husband or wife on that day would certainly find their "theories" insulting.
As Penn and Teller pretty much said in an episode of Bullshit!, it is disgusting for people to be taking tragedies and exploiting them by spreading bull and misinformation Just to turn a profit. The people who create these theories ALWAYS have a book to sell or are looking for a paid interview. It's all about the money. And that is the worst thing we can do after what happened to all those people.
[QUOTE=Teddi Orange;34571110][URL]http://www.drjudywood.com/[/URL] uhhh I think she's bit of a fanatic. Edit: Her qualifications according to her website: [B]B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering)[/B] [/QUOTE] Qualified in bullshit alright.
[QUOTE=znk666;34572788]OH GOD I'VE BEEN LIVING IN A LIE MY WHOLE LIFE.[/QUOTE] You've been living in the ruins of the twin towers your whole life?
[QUOTE=Strongbad;34572806]You've been living in the ruins of the twin towers your whole life?[/QUOTE] No, he's been living in a secret laser weapon of ambiguous nationality.
Oh hey, a Tesla backed 9/11 conspiracy! As if we needed another reason for crazies the get crazier.
[QUOTE=Ogris;34572320]Qualified in bullshit alright.[/QUOTE] Her theories may be bullshit, but there's nothing to frown upon about a Structural engineering degree. She's still a money-laundering fraud, though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.