• Photos of your lawnmo- car(s)! V2
    4,308 replies, posted
you brought this on yourself
[QUOTE=Ldesu;35782476][t]http://puu.sh/sndZ[/t][t]http://puu.sh/sneJ[/t] Polish'd! Found some cheap polish lying around so I polished it and the difference from before is insane. It doesn't look [I]that[/I] much shinier in pictures, but it really is [I]alot[/I] shinier[/QUOTE] looks nice, but I'm kinda dying to see the interior now, would you be willing to take some pics? [editline]1st May 2012[/editline] oh nvm just saw your video in joyriding
[QUOTE=Hell Strike;35778700]you would have to worry about fitting around the disks, also i don't think those would look good on any new mustangs. you might like the wheels that came on the 03-04 mach 1s though! [img]http://www.mach1registry.com/photos/mach%201%20rims.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I've actually seen those before, there's a Mach 1 from that time that roams around town. I'll look into it though! What are they, 17 inch?
[QUOTE=NuclearAnnhilation;35789005]I've actually seen those before, there's a Mach 1 from that time that roams around town. I'll look into it though! What are they, 17 inch?[/QUOTE] yep
1999 Tiburon 5 speed [IMG]http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u282/realmgen/babytibs.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u282/realmgen/pic1.jpg[/IMG]
Nice hood
You mean bonnet right?
I DONT NEED YOUR EUROPEAN MUMBO JUMBO
[QUOTE=tommyc225;35795213]You mean bonnet right?[/QUOTE] You mean panser right?
You mean tank right?
[QUOTE=NuclearAnnhilation;35795223]I DONT NEED YOUR EUROPEAN MUMBO JUMBO[/QUOTE] English* Europe is much more than Britain
Well duh, I just figured that was a European thing as a whole
[QUOTE=tommyc225;35795213]You mean bonnet right?[/QUOTE]we only use amurrican words around here, boy
[QUOTE=Glitch360;35795679]we only use amurrican words around here, boy[/QUOTE] You and what army is gonna stop me blud
[QUOTE=Glitch360;35795679]we only use amurrican words around here, boy[/QUOTE] The [I]colour[/I] of that [I]bonnet [/I]is black. [editline]2nd May 2012[/editline] come at me
i think he means engine cowl
dat ricer hood
Turdburon's are like the ultimate try-hard car for ricers. [editline]2nd May 2012[/editline] Hyundai's rear wheel drive genesis is sexy as [I]fuck[/I] though. I say this because I don't want another HURP DURP U DUN LIEK <country> CARS DURRR fight again.
[QUOTE=MightyMax;35797790]Tuburon's are like the ultimate try-hard car for ricers. [editline]2nd May 2012[/editline] Hyundai's rear wheel drive genesis is sexy as [I]fuck[/I] though. I say this because I don't want another HURP DURP U DUN LIEK <country> CARS DURRR fight again.[/QUOTE] those statements are absolutly correct
[img]http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/4431/dsc0761ag.jpg[/img] I like how new my interior looks still after 117k. I can't really provide any clear pictures, as this lens is the ONLY lens i have to use. I got the camera for $100 from a friend (which is an EXTREMELY good deal,) and she just let me borrow this. That's why i was getting annoyed when people were telling me the pictures would look better without it. Without it, there wouldn't be any pictures at all. There is no way to get more in focus than what i'm getting, with this lens. I still take pictures and submit them, because i enjoy it. I was getting irritated the other day when my pictures that are taken with a $400-$600 camera with a $200 lens were being compared to instagram, which i have never used in my entire life. Also, my car is 100% stock, so having it called a ricer is just plain incorrect; not to mention frustrating.
Justin v2 ^
[QUOTE=Dylan_94;35798051]I was getting irritated the other day when my pictures that are taken with a $400-$600 camera with a $200 lens were being compared to instagram, which i have never used in my entire life.[/QUOTE] just because it's expensive doesn't mean it's good
its a picture of a car interior jeez chill
just get a 50mm f/1.8 they are like 100 bux [editline]3rd May 2012[/editline] and quite sharp
[QUOTE=Dylan_94;35798051] I like how new my interior looks still after 117k. I can't really provide any clear pictures, as this lens is the ONLY lens i have to use. I got the camera for $100 from a friend (which is an EXTREMELY good deal,) and she just let me borrow this. That's why i was getting annoyed when people were telling me the pictures would look better without it. Without it, there wouldn't be any pictures at all. There is no way to get more in focus than what i'm getting, with this lens. I still take pictures and submit them, because i enjoy it. [B]I was getting irritated the other day when my pictures that are taken with a $400-$600 camera with a $200 lens were being compared to instagram, which i have never used in my entire life.[/B] Also, my car is 100% stock, so having is called a ricer is just plain incorrect; not to mention frustrating.[/QUOTE] says a lot about the equipment you're using dude
[QUOTE=MightyMax;35798943]Justin v2 ^[/QUOTE] *sigh* Here we go again... Just leave if this is all you're gonna fucking do here. We don't need people like you here if you're going to act like this. Besides, what the hell does he have in common with me at ALL? How is he me V2? I don't understand. Just you being you i guess.
[QUOTE=justin1992;35800456]*sigh* Here we go again... Just leave if this is all you're gonna fucking do here. We don't need people like you here if you're going to act like this.[/QUOTE]k
He's probably using a tilt/shift lens, makes what is around the main subject blurred.. (If being tilted, shifting has a different effect) Having one of those lenses is a bit of a boon, because they are quite expensive (if of quality) and they can provide interesting shots.. However, not for an interior shot. (I understand that's the only lens you have, that's not where I was going with this) @ MightyMax - Good. And I agree with Ollih, a 50mm lens would serve you well, and they're quite cheap.
[QUOTE=redback3;35799352]says a lot about the equipment you're using dude[/QUOTE] That wasn't my point [QUOTE=Ollih;35799276]just because it's expensive doesn't mean it's good[/QUOTE] That wasn't my point [QUOTE=Bugga12;35800891]He's probably using a tilt/shift lens, makes what is around the main subject blurred.. (If being tilted, shifting has a different effect) Having one of those lenses is a bit of a boon, because they are quite expensive (if of quality) and they can provide interesting shots.. However, not for an interior shot. (I understand that's the only lens you have, that's not where I was going with this) @ MightyMax - Good. And I agree with Ollih, a 50mm lens would serve you well, and they're quite cheap.[/QUOTE] This was my point. All i was really trying to say is, that lens is the only way i can take pictures, and it's not really meant for general photos of things. But i still like taking pictures until i get my 50mm(which has been planned since i got the camera), so they are going to look like that. [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005LEN4/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER[/url] I'm getting this in a few weeks, and it will produce the style of photos I want.
[QUOTE=Dylan_94;35802052]That wasn't my point That wasn't my point This was my point. All i was really trying to say is, that lens is the only way i can take pictures, and it's not really meant for general photos of things. But i still like taking pictures until i get my 50mm(which has been planned since i got the camera), so they are going to look like that. [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005LEN4/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER[/url] I'm getting this in a few weeks, and it will produce the style of photos I want.[/QUOTE] Make sure your camera has an AF motor, if it doesn't you're going to want an AF-S lens.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.