• Cars that look great to you.
    3,117 replies, posted
yeah what are those? torq thrusts or something? I just picked it cuz i like red 1800s'
it's like shiny versions of my wheels haha
[img]http://gyazo.com/1ba22ab98cdacb5b72cc4dd420af26e7.png[/img]
<3 [img]http://a837.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/52/l_4b7d4ac1d36a5ffeb7a2e0c32a69d47c.jpg[/img] [img]http://a550.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/99/l_1ea770a5991a47551784f38ffdd27db5.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Ca5bah;29143879]<3 [img_thumb]http://a837.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/52/l_4b7d4ac1d36a5ffeb7a2e0c32a69d47c.jpg[/img_thumb] [img_thumb]http://a550.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/99/l_1ea770a5991a47551784f38ffdd27db5.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] It's too bad the current CTS is so ugly :(
Murdered out CTS's are my favourite, but it is seldom done correctly.
[QUOTE=Penis Colada;29144967]It's too bad the current CTS is so ugly :([/QUOTE] Way better interior though. [editline]13th April 2011[/editline] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7IUyjkmr_w[/media]
[img]http://www.2012-mustang.com/images/mustang_gt.jpg[/img] Fuck yes.
[QUOTE=Hell Strike;29135978][img_thumb]http://gyazo.com/1ba22ab98cdacb5b72cc4dd420af26e7.png[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] nice toyota is that like a new supra
[img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3312/3665931900_b077a253e0.jpg[/img] This is my first car, well almost the same but mine is a darker red and has a black vinyl top on it. Lots of people say it's ugly but those are the same people who go "LOL SUPRA WITH 12 FOOT WING SO COOL LOL" Gotta get some pics up for you guys one day
[QUOTE=bradley;29091239]That is a dreadful noise that car makes. The Zonda had a magnificent tone, the Huayra.... I wouldn't call it a [i]tone[/i] so much as a [i]moan[/i].[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQLqr5Q7FRE[/media] Retarded name for a retarded car. [QUOTE=Satane;29153725][img_thumb]http://www.2012-mustang.com/images/mustang_gt.jpg[/img_thumb] Fuck yes.[/QUOTE] No, anything past 1995 in the mustang market is just ugly. If you want class look back into 1960's, thats the only time they actually looked good. I personally like the 1969 Boss Fastback out of all of them. [img]http://static.cargurus.com/images/site/2009/09/22/20/04/1969_ford_mustang_boss_429-pic-48489.jpeg[/img] Sadly that one has stupid custom rims, not the original which I find look much better.
[img]http://www.caruuu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/louer-une-bugatti-veyron1.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=fritter22;29154975][img_thumb]http://www.caruuu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/louer-une-bugatti-veyron1.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] The first thing that comes to mind for me when I see that is ugly round cheese graters.... no idea why :v:
[QUOTE=EDDY TT;29154928]No, anything past 1995 in the mustang market is just ugly.[/QUOTE] But but but :smith: [img_thumb]http://www.lincah.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/2010-Ford-Shelby-GT500-Super-Snake-Front-Side-View-800x600.jpg[/img_thumb] [img]http://www.topgearrules.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2011gt500mustang.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=evilweazel;29155074]The first thing that comes to mind for me when I see that is ugly round cheese graters.... no idea why :v:[/QUOTE] well everyone is entitled to their own opinion i suppose
[QUOTE=EDDY TT;29154928][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQLqr5Q7FRE[/media] Retarded name for a retarded car. No, anything past 1995 in the mustang market is just ugly. If you want class look back into 1960's, thats the only time they actually looked good. I personally like the 1969 Boss Fastback out of all of them. [img_thumb]http://static.cargurus.com/images/site/2009/09/22/20/04/1969_ford_mustang_boss_429-pic-48489.jpeg[/img_thumb] Sadly that one has stupid custom rims, not the original which I find look much better.[/QUOTE] only mustangs i think aren't super pretty are foxbodies [editline]13th April 2011[/editline] whoop back the fuck up [img]http://www.allfordmustangs.com/photopost/data/500/2003_Mustang_Cobra_10.jpg[/img]
Foxbodies look OK (in the right circumstances), but don't make me think of what a mustang should be like at all
If you're going to drive a Mustang... [img]http://autocarsnews.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/1971-Ford-Mustang-Mach-1-Picture.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Hell Strike;29155404]only mustangs i think aren't super pretty are foxbodies [editline]13th April 2011[/editline] whoop back the fuck up [img_thumb]http://www.allfordmustangs.com/photopost/data/500/2003_Mustang_Cobra_10.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] so all the 03 cobras i see with a cobra in the grille are aftermarket? i thought it came stock on 03/04's
[QUOTE=lemon_lover;29155638]so all the 03 cobras i see with a cobra in the grille are aftermarket? i thought it came stock on 03/04's[/QUOTE] i think they do come with a cobra, this guy just put a pony in it.
and yet everything else is stock?
[QUOTE=Hell Strike;29155865]i think they do come with a cobra, this guy just put a pony in it.[/QUOTE] Nope, all cobra's should come with the default mustang badge which is the horse. The cobra is the same one they use on the 07 shelby GT 500, it's on the side. Fun fact: the 07 shelby GT 500 only has 450 bhp stock, should have called it the GT 450.
[QUOTE=EDDY TT;29156111]Nope, all cobra's should come with the default mustang badge which is the horse. The cobra is the same one they use on the 07 shelby GT 500, it's on the side. Fun fact: the 07 shelby GT 500 only has 450 bhp stock, should have called it the GT 450.[/QUOTE] I don't think it's named after the horsepower rating.
Honda Civic Hatchback '94 [img]http://static.cargurus.com/images/site/2009/06/12/09/57/1994-honda-civic-2-dr-si-hatchback-pic-6798.jpeg[/img]
[QUOTE=EDDY TT;29156111]Nope, all cobra's should come with the default mustang badge which is the horse. The cobra is the same one they use on the 07 shelby GT 500, it's on the side. Fun fact: the 07 shelby GT 500 only has 450 bhp stock, should have called it the GT 450.[/QUOTE] Fun fact: the 07 honda s2000 only has 237 bhp stock, should have called it the honda s237.
[QUOTE=Hell Strike;29156554]I don't think it's named after the horsepower rating.[/QUOTE] It was a sarcastic punch at the name, the '67 shelby only came with around 355bph originally. Tweaked enough it could sit at 400 but it made little difference as it struggled to put the extra power down.
No hellstrike, it's called the Honda S2000 for a reason. It has exactly 2 thousand horsepowers, duh.
[QUOTE=Hell Strike;29156834]Fun fact: the 07 honda s2000 only has 237 bhp stock, should have called it the honda s237.[/QUOTE] All of Honda's S-series of sportscars are named after their displacement when they are first put into production... [editline]13th April 2011[/editline] derp nevermind, I get the joke now.
[QUOTE=bradley;29157821]All of Honda's S-series of sportscars are named after their displacement when they are first put into production... [editline]13th April 2011[/editline] derp nevermind, I get the joke now.[/QUOTE] the civic Si has a displacement of i :crossarms:
....S-series of sportscars. Not Civics. Not Si-badged anything. The S. [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e5/1963_Honda_S500_01.jpg[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/HondaS600-001.jpg/800px-HondaS600-001.jpg[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/31/HondaS800.JPG/800px-HondaS800.JPG[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/HondaS2000-004.jpg/800px-HondaS2000-004.jpg[/img_thumb] 500 - 600 - 800 - 2000
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.