• Gays v2 - really, there's nothing wrong with them
    394 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34694450]Gay people are a abomination of nature, they throw nature out of balance. Men and women are to be joined to create a balance (at least for you lower humans). If you don't think it makes a balance in nature, let me ask you this why would a man have a penis and a woman a vagina? If men were meant to be with other men, wouldn't men be born with both a vagina and a penis? Also if women were meant to be with other women wouldn't they have both genitals? The answer is obvious, women were meant for men. To say so otherwise is total ignorance.[/QUOTE] If anyone is an abomination of nature, it's you breeders, purposefully spewing out babies and overpopulating the Earth. Our unnatural manipulation of plant genetics has allowed us to get this far, but it is only a matter of time until we fall into a dark age as MOTHER NATURE clears us out. I'm doing my part, are you doing yours?
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34694450]Gay people are a abomination of nature, they throw nature out of balance. Men and women are to be joined to create a balance (at least for you lower humans). If you don't think it makes a balance in nature, let me ask you this why would a man have a penis and a woman a vagina? If men were meant to be with other men, wouldn't men be born with both a vagina and a penis? Also if women were meant to be with other women wouldn't they have both genitals? The answer is obvious, women were meant for men. To say so otherwise is total ignorance.[/QUOTE] I'm sorry but there are a lot of things we aren't 'meant' to do, it's like saying we shouldn't use planes since according to nature we aren't allowed to fly.
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34694638]It is obvious that my argument is correct. Your arguments are based off of fallacy and ignorance. My argument is based off of [b]facts and proper logic.[/b] The problem is that you all are just stuck in your ignorance and cannot see the light of my knowledge.[/QUOTE] Fact: homosexuality exists in nature, yet no species have gone extinct from it and never will.
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34694450]Gay people are a abomination of nature, they throw nature out of balance.[/QUOTE] And people like this don't? [IMG]http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/12/19/1229695672768/Michelle-Duggars-family-i-001.jpg[/IMG] The world is already dangerously overpopulated, there are 1.5 million homeless children in america alone, now try to tell me it's because I don't find women attractive that nature is out of balance?
[QUOTE=umm wtf;34695620]And people like this don't? [IMG]http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/12/19/1229695672768/Michelle-Duggars-family-i-001.jpg[/IMG] The world is already dangerously overpopulated, there are 1.5 million homeless children in america alone, now try to tell me it's because I don't find women attractive that nature is out of balance?[/QUOTE] The world is not dangerously overpopulated, also there are far less than that according to the Horizons for homeless children. Your argument is flawed you can't stand against mine.
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34695664]The world is not dangerously overpopulated, also there are far less than that according to the Horizons for homeless children. Your argument is flawed you can't stand against mine.[/QUOTE] you don't have an argument, you just have biased fallacy about 'nature' when it's already been established several times in the thread before this that the nature argument is bullshit considering the amount of homosexuality in nature and the fact that humanity has transcended the need for a nature argument
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34695664]The world is not dangerously overpopulated, also there are far less than that according to the Horizons for homeless children. Your argument is flawed you can't stand against mine.[/QUOTE] In third world countries it is very much over populated, why do you think China has been taking extreme measures to keep it's population down?
[QUOTE=strayebyrd;34695685]you don't have an argument, you just have biased fallacy about 'nature' when it's already been established several times in the thread before this that the nature argument is bullshit considering the amount of homosexuality in nature and the fact that humanity has transcended the need for a nature argument[/QUOTE] Theres a deeper context to my argument, if you studied or had any sense of decent reading comprehension you could tell my argument is 100% valid anything you have read before reading my argument is a lie if it does not agree with what i have stated.
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34696386]Theres a deeper context to my argument, if you studied or had any sense of decent reading comprehension you could tell my argument is 100% valid anything you have read before reading my argument is a lie if it does not agree with what i have stated.[/QUOTE] no there isn't a deeper context to your argument, you're either just dumb or trolling at this stage because all you've said is 'GAY BAD BECAUSE NATURE' and ignored the fact that homosexuality occurs all the time in nature. This argument has been going on for two threads now, your side has been devalued over and over, the fact that you cling so self-righteously to it shows that you have some sort of superiority complex and shouldn't be engaging in debate in the first place.
[QUOTE=Mr. Creeper;34696386]Theres a deeper context to my argument, if you studied or had any sense of decent reading comprehension you could tell my argument is 100% valid anything you have read before reading my argument is a lie if it does not agree with what i have stated.[/QUOTE] Because I'm unaware of the statistics of the 6.8 billion people that currently inhabit the Earth, I'm going to use the US as an example. Currently, there are 311,591,917 people in the United States of America. Of that 311,591,917, [b]two fucking percent[/b], yes, [b]2%[/b], are homosexual. That's about 6,232,000 people. How can you fucking say that those 6 million ruin the balance of nature? That doesn't make any sense.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;34696274]In third world countries it is very much over populated, why do you think China has been taking extreme measures to keep it's population down?[/QUOTE] This is a fallacy. Malthusian ideas have been soundly disproven since the early 19th century.
The Abomination refuses to reply to my argument, I have won and there is no reason to carry on. This is how debating works.
[QUOTE=Levithan;34696711]The Abomination refuses to reply to my argument, I have won and there is no reason to carry on. This is how debating works.[/QUOTE] Well he's obviously on a high horse. Anyone who throws in a good retort he just seems to respond with, "You're ignorant, I'm right."
I think he's obviously a troll
[QUOTE=st0rmforce;34696821]I think he's obviously a troll[/QUOTE] He's just stupid.
[QUOTE=Levithan;34696711]The Abomination refuses to reply to my argument, I have won and there is no reason to carry on. This is how debating works.[/QUOTE] I'm still going to hug a man whenever you like it or not. Hah! Can't stop me from hugging men! How about I go a step further to make you more uneasy!
[QUOTE=Levithan;34696711]The Abomination refuses to reply to my argument, I have won and there is no reason to carry on. This is how debating works.[/QUOTE] I am glad you see things my way. Now we can put a end to this thread and conclude that it is wrong to be gay and only straight people are correct! What a brillant end. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling / Homophobic" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
I honestly don't see what the problem is with gays. A few of my friends happen to be gay, and I'm perfectly fine with that. It's a lifestyle choice, and although others may not agree with it, they have the right to be treated like everyone else regardless of their sexual preference. The only reason people would think otherwise is mainly because of the ignorance that they were taught by their religion(s) or family upbringings.
[QUOTE=Katra804;34699973]I honestly don't see what the problem is with gays. A few of my friends happen to be gay, and I'm perfectly fine with that. It's a lifestyle choice, and although others may not agree with it, they have the right to be treated like everyone else regardless of their sexual preference. The only reason people would think otherwise is mainly because of the ignorance that they were taught by their religion(s) or family upbringings.[/QUOTE] I'm glad you are fine with gays, but please don't call it a choice.
[QUOTE=T-Sonar.0;34700591]I'm glad you are fine with gays, but please don't call it a choice.[/QUOTE] Didn't mean anything when I said that, it's just how I see it.
[QUOTE=Katra804;34700858]Didn't mean anything when I said that, it's just how I see it.[/QUOTE] When did you choose to be straight?
[QUOTE=T-Sonar.0;34701268]When did you choose to be straight?[/QUOTE] I'm not going to discuss my own sexuality, that business is my own. I was just making a statement based off of what I was reading in this thread and how ignorant some people can be.
[QUOTE=Katra804;34701421]I'm not going to discuss my own sexuality, that business is my own. I was just making a statement based off of what I was reading in this thread and how ignorant some people can be.[/QUOTE] Not trying to be hostile, but what [i]did[/i] you mean when you said lifestyle choice?
It's not that complicated. If you discover that you have "feelings" for people of the same sex, you can [B]choose[/B] to encourage or discourage those feelings by a number of ways - including coming out and submitting to a lifestyle, that while being stereotypical, does exist. Being gay today is more than just the technical aspects of it. Labeling yourself as homo, bi, or hetero will greatly affect the way the world looks at you, and thus will probably in some way affect the way [I]you[/I] feel. So being gay or not [I]is[/I] a choice to some degree.
[QUOTE=Katra804;34701421]I'm not going to discuss my own sexuality, that business is my own. I was just making a statement based off of what I was reading in this thread and how ignorant some people can be.[/QUOTE] It's a rhetorical question. I doubt you chose your sexuality, just like how I didn't choose to be homosexual. That was the point I was trying to make. Seriously, who in their right mind would freely choose to be treated as lesser beings and not be given rights?
[QUOTE=T-Sonar.0;34704128] Seriously, who in their right mind would freely choose to be treated as lesser beings and not be given rights?[/QUOTE] Because it's fun, experimentation, low confidence, to feel special, can't get along with girls, to be rebellious. In some developed countries you don't even have to sacrifice any rights.
This just in. Gays suck. It's a known fact. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling" - Autumn))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Rad McCool;34703480]So being gay or not [I]is[/I] a choice to some degree.[/QUOTE] I'm a male who is attracted to women. I had literally no choice in this. Not long after turning 11 I was all over dem' ass and titties. I imagine it is the same for many gay people right? If so, is it still a choice?
Yes I think so.
[QUOTE=Rad McCool;34708391]Yes I think so.[/QUOTE] Was my heterosexuality a choice? I mean I guess I [b]could[/b] start boning dudes but I'm not attracted to them.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.