• The SCP Foundation - "Send in the D-Class!"
    5,411 replies, posted
Oh god, [url=http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-914]Experiment Log 914.[/url] [quote]Name: Dr. Bright Date: ██/█/20██ Total items: 5 20.3cm Little Pearl Vibrators Input:1 Little Pearl Vibrator Setting: Rough Output: 1 Little Pearl Vibrator, bisected down the long axis by what appears to be a very sharp cutting tool. Provide a perfect cross-section of the item. Setting: Coarse Output: 2 D-cell batteries, pile of plastic pellets Setting: 1:1 Output:1 fist shaped plastic vibrator Setting: Fine Output:1 much more complex vibrator, including reservoir tip applicator filled with unknown lubricant, multiple turning rings, and studs that pop out when the handle is twisted. Setting: Very Fine Output: 1 small black box, bearing a red button. When the button is pressed, everyone in line of sight of the object except the holder experiences an overpowering orgasm. Note: The Very Fine has been confiscated by Oversight, due to potential for misuse. Note: Dr. Bright has been forcibly removed from any further experimentation involving SCP-914, and all output objects have been destroyed. This is just getting silly. -Dr. Kondraki[/quote]
[QUOTE=Empty_Shadow;32529191]A game of do whatever you want with no drawbacks whatsoever isn't something that makes a good SCP in my books. You shouldn't WANT to go near these things, that's why the foundation exists, to protect you.[/QUOTE] Have you even read about half these SCPs? There are a ton that aren't dangerous, and a ton that are really useful with no drawbacks whatsoever. In fact pretty much anything that is 'safe' doesn't have many drawbacks.
[QUOTE=catbarf;32529131]Um, a game that changes itself in an inexplicable way but isn't overtly harmful is exactly what a Euclid should be.[/QUOTE] You do know safe/euclid/keter are referring to the chance/desire the SCP has to be contained and kept away from society?
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32529341]In fact pretty much anything that is 'safe' doesn't have many drawbacks.[/QUOTE] Well, technically, this isn't true- safe just means it's understood and its behavior can be predicted. A gun or rat poison would be considered 'safe'. On the other hand, a gun that sometimes shot flowers and sometimes shot anti-tank rockets would be a Euclid, and one that levitates in the air and hunts people would be a Keter.
[QUOTE=Spycrabz;32502039][img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34347597/scp.JPG[/img] Time to start writing![/QUOTE]You and me both, amigo. I'm currently working on my story. [editline]28th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=latin_geek;32529442]You do know safe/euclid/keter are referring to the chance/desire the SCP has to be contained and kept away from society?[/QUOTE]use the locked box theory as SCP says: Safe: if you lock it in a box, and you know nothing will happen, it's safe. Euclid: if you lock it in a box and you have no clue what will happen, it's euclid. Keter: if you lock it in a box and it breaks out of said box and fucking kills everything in sight, it's keter
[url]http://sandbox.scp-wiki.net/remus[/url] Done a little more polishing.
Here's my current set of drafts: [url]http://sandbox.scp-wiki.net/zombiis-test[/url] Mmhmm.
[url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-802[/url] Aww, it's a big harmless caterpillar tank. Except for the fact that it would run you over.
[QUOTE=Zombii;32529766]Here's my current set of drafts: [url]http://sandbox.scp-wiki.net/zombiis-test[/url] Mmhmm.[/QUOTE] [quote]Leading to, eventually, a total stop in [DATA EXPUNGED] in the local environment.[/quote] metabolism? :v:
[QUOTE=Spycrabz;32530040]metabolism? :v:[/QUOTE] No, ██████ ████████.
[QUOTE=Zombii;32530071]No, ██████ ████████.[/QUOTE] Pfft, that idea is ████
Yeah well ███████████████.
Really guys? You're all being a bunch of [DATA EXPUNGED].
[QUOTE=credesniper;32530195]Really guys? You're all being a bunch of [DATA EXPUNGED].[/QUOTE] Shut your [REDACTED]
[I]-Stop disclosing pending SCP article data in public forums, you'll be on Keter duty for the rest of the year next time i catch you.[/I] -Dr. ██████████
row row fight the O5-x
I thought we told you that if you kept threatening people with Keter duty we'd throw you on Keter duty for the rest of the year. Clean up your act, you worthless pieces of [EXPUNGED.]
I sure want that SCP-662...
You guys know there is an SCP called the X-Sponge, which eats text off the paper, which is where [EXPUNGED] comes from. [editline]29th September 2011[/editline] SCP wise. [editline]29th September 2011[/editline] [url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1459-j[/url]
Hey, Empty_Shadow, I did an op rewrite using ~banners~. Check it out: [url]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3965132/shit%20past%201013/shit/scp/New%20Text%20Document.txt[/url]
[quote]Note ██/██/1939:We need to figure this one out. If we can just understand how it does what it does, we could have an unlimited supply of energy. All the top researchers on it, stat! -Site ██ Supervisor J█████ R█████ O██████████ Note ██/██/1942: R█████, I've figured it out. What to do with it. We simply [DATA REDACTED] It'll work. -Senior Researcher A█████ E███████ Note ██/██/1942: It did work. We're moving forward with this project, as of now. Good job A█████, you've got a promotion coming. We'll be [DATA EXPUNGED] -Site ██ Supervisor J█████ R█████ O██████████ Note ██/██/1945: My god, what have we done? -Site ██ Supervisor J█████ R█████ O██████████[/quote] Rich. [editline]28th September 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=MightyMax;32530476]You guys know there is an SCP called the X-Sponge, which eats text off the paper, which is where [EXPUNGED] comes from. [editline]29th September 2011[/editline] SCP wise. [editline]29th September 2011[/editline] [url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1459-j[/url][/QUOTE]It's a j article, and is pretty recent. I don't think it was the original cause of expunged, but it does fit.
[QUOTE=credesniper;32530534]Rich. [editline]28th September 2011[/editline] It's a j article, and is pretty recent. I don't think it was the original cause of expunged, but it does fit.[/QUOTE]well it makes sense for me. I personally think it fits amazingly considering how silly SCP is.
It's a J article so it's not canon. It would be kind of funny but I doubt it, they don't need an SCP for that, all they need is a bottle of black ink. [editline]28th September 2011[/editline] Now an SCP that is an endless source of black ink would be useful to them.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32530753]It's a J article so it's not canon. It would be kind of funny but I doubt it, they don't need an SCP for that, all they need is a bottle of black ink. [editline]28th September 2011[/editline] Now an SCP that is an endless source of black ink would be useful to them.[/QUOTE] The coffee machine
[QUOTE=credesniper;32529854][url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-802[/url] Aww, it's a big harmless caterpillar tank. Except for the fact that it would run you over.[/QUOTE] reminds me of a short foreign animation I once saw.
[QUOTE=Zombii;32530527]Hey, Empty_Shadow, I did an op rewrite using ~banners~. Check it out: [url]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3965132/shit%20past%201013/shit/scp/New%20Text%20Document.txt[/url][/QUOTE] You removed everything I wrote :saddowns:
To be honest I didn't read the OP. :v: Just a suggestion, you could keep the introduction, just put it before my intro but after the banners.
[url]http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-011[/url] :v:
[url=http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-370]THERE IS NO GOD. I AM GOD.[/url]
[QUOTE]138) Dr. Bright may not put "A cup of orgasm" from SCP-294 through SCP-914 on the Very Fine setting. 138.1) Dr. Bright may not use SCP-294 to create a "cup of memetic orgasm" and use it on worldwide television. 138.5) Dr. Bright is not permitted to use SCP-294 to create orgasms of any kind, memetic, sentient or otherwise. 138.6) Given the results of requesting a cup of "Dear God No", Dr.Bright is no longer allowed to use SCP-294 directly or outside of approved testing.[/QUOTE] Apparently, "Dear God no" is a liquid guys!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.