• The logic behind Religion
    1,942 replies, posted
If one claims there is a God, they need to prove there is a God with scientific evidence for it to be considered true. Otherwise there's no reason to believe in him any more than you believe in the flying spaghetti monster. Correct? Why would the burden of proof fall on the agnostic to disprove the claim that does not have any observable evidence? (books written by men do not count as scientific evidence). In what strange world do we live in where a claim with no evidence (actually having evidence that directly contradicts the claim) is considered true until it can be disproved? You might as well say "The flying spaghetti monster exists until you can disprove his existence, otherwise, you're wrong", which as I'm sure you'll all agree is ridiculous. Religion has actually tried to adapt to contradictory scientific evidence by changing their standpoint from "this is the unaltered 100% true word of god as it happened" to "ok well maybe the words were more vague and metaphorical and genesis days are actually millions of years" etc. It shows that people are so strongly addicted to spirituality that they won't let go even in the face of mountains of contradictory evidence, instead trying to shape their belief into a more modern and attractive package. Illogical claims are still illogical however, and it all still boils down to the same general point, the claim isn't right until proven wrong.. its wrong until proven right.
Nobody can prove or disprove most religions, it's up to the person to decide whether they want to partake in them.
[QUOTE=scotland1;32375735]Nobody can prove or disprove most religions, it's up to the person to decide whether they want to partake in them.[/QUOTE] Read the post. This isn't about whether someone has the right to partake in a belief, of course they have that right. It's addressing the general lack of logic behind it.
[QUOTE=Noble;32375761]Read the post. This isn't about whether someone has the right to partake in a belief, of course they have that right. It's addressing the general lack of logic behind it.[/QUOTE] Exactly. If they want to be part of a religion, that is up to them. They don't need logic to believe certain things.
[QUOTE=Noble;32375761]Read the post. This isn't about whether someone has the right to partake in a belief, of course they have that right. It's addressing the general lack of logic behind it.[/QUOTE] More than likely because religion's roots lie in faith and not logic...
It has been hypothesized that humans need to believe in a god as part of our make up. Granted, this should be mostly pointless now that we have evolved to be intelligent enough to know that there is almost certainly no god. Now, the main reason that people are religious, at least in my opinion is because their parents were and now they are simply because they don't want to disappoint their parents. They in turn make their kids follow the religion they are in, ad infinitum.
Because some people want something to believe in, they don't care if they can't prove it. Also, wasn't there a study that said that the Human brain is 'wired' in such a way that fiath is easy for them to believe?
[QUOTE=scotland1;32375768]Exactly. If they want to be part of a religion, that is up to them. They don't need logic to believe certain things.[/QUOTE] Oh, right, so ignoring mountains of scientific evidence and saying we don't need logic is obviously something an educated person would do.
[QUOTE=Noble;32375803]Oh, right, so ignoring mountains of scientific evidence and saying we don't need logic is obviously something an educated person would do.[/QUOTE] Again, they don't care. A lot of religious people just believe in the morals and the support of the other members of the religion. It doesn't matter how stupid or illogical the religion sounds on paper.
Religion isn't a matter of logic. It's a matter of identity. People, even very logical people, aren't just going to switch to atheism just because they can't prove God exists, because believing in God is part of who they are. I don't know why some people have so much time accepting that. Lots of great philosophers, logical thinkers and scientists throughout history have been Christians or Deists. What isn't logical is to have the stance that everyone who believes in anything they can't scientifically prove is stupid because of it.
Christianity is actually one of the only modern religions that is based off of historical events and the history of Jesus Christ is where most of Christians get their "evidence". Corinthians 15:1-20 basically says the Christian faith is dependent upon the historical fact of the life and death of Jesus. However everybody has a different interpretation where Jesus was the messiah, maybe he existed but wasn't God, or maybe he never existed at all.
Dont make me talk now.
[QUOTE=Parker;32375779]More than likely because religion's roots lie in faith and not logic...[/QUOTE] Claims based on evidence Claims based on faith. The first one is logical, the second one isn't.
Religion is easy to believe if you're unable to comprehend the truth. I'd imagine it would be kind of hard to a true scientist to believe that God created everything on earth. That's what it comes down to. I can see how people get `addicted` to the community and the routine. I can see how it holds people together to have something to believe in. But the indisputable bottom line is that religion is illogical.
Before trying to prove there is no God, try to explain what happened from the start. There is something out there that we don't know. You can't deny it.
It appears humans always want to know everything about themselves including their creation and what will happen to their personalty after they die. They naturally turn to a bunch of stores passed on for centuries and try to prove information about how we ended up here and where we go next. Personally I do not see why we must criticize the ones that want to believe that. It really has nothing to do with anyone else. (Sometimes people make it though and that's when it gets annoying)
I live assuming wrong unless proven right. The logic behind Religion as I see it is to give people (a false sense of) hope.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;32375841]Christianity is actually one of the only modern religions that is based off of historical events and the history of Jesus Christ is where most of Christians get their "evidence". Corinthians 15:1-20 basically says the Christian faith is dependent upon the historical fact of the life and death of Jesus. However everybody has a different interpretation where Jesus was the messiah, maybe he existed but wasn't God, or maybe he never existed at all.[/QUOTE] Using the Bible to prove that Jesus was the son of God is like using Lord Of The Rings to prove that elves exist.
[QUOTE=garry;32375856]Religion is easy to believe if you're unable to comprehend the truth. I'd imagine it would be kind of hard to a true scientist to believe that God created everything on earth. That's what it comes down to. I can see how people get `addicted` to the community and the routine. I can see how it holds people together to have something to believe in. But the indisputable bottom line is that religion is illogical.[/QUOTE] Yes, my bottom line is that religion (and faith) are both illogical. Whether not society wants to accept that is not the point of my post. You don't get to just ignore science and logic because they disprove some of your traditions.
[QUOTE=Noble;32375803]Oh, right, so ignoring mountains of scientific evidence and saying we don't need logic is obviously something an educated person would do.[/QUOTE] There are no "mountains of scientific evidence" for saying God doesn't exist, and if you're talking about Evolution and stuff like that, then you're lumping all Christians into one group, which is not intellectually honest. [Quote]Granted, this should be mostly pointless now that we have evolved to be intelligent enough to know that there is almost certainly no god.[/quote] Whether or not there's a God is not a matter of science, thinking otherwise is extreme arrogance on the part of an Atheist.
[QUOTE=Abrown516;32375881]I live assuming wrong unless proven right. The logic behind Religion as I see it is to give people (a false sense of) hope.[/QUOTE] If that's the case, why is that a bad thing? We give false hope to each other daily.
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;32375861]Before trying to prove there is no God, try to explain what happened from the start. There is something out there that we don't know. You can't deny it.[/QUOTE] You don't have to prove there isn't a God, there's no evidence for God. It works the other way around. You have to prove there is a God.
[QUOTE=Noble;32375803]Oh, right, so ignoring mountains of scientific evidence and saying we don't need logic is obviously something an educated person would do.[/QUOTE] No one on this planet knows the exact origins of the universe, yes, we have theories as to where we came from, but none of them are without problems. I think until we have substantial evidence as to our origins it would be ignorant and wrong to bash other peoples' beliefs, however ridiculous or unlikely they are.
[QUOTE=garry;32375883]Using the Bible to prove that Jesus was the son of God is like using [b]Lord Of The Rings to prove that elves exist.[/b][/QUOTE] Are you trying to imply they don't?
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;32375861]Before trying to prove there is no God, try to explain what happened from the start. There is something out there that we don't know. You can't deny it.[/QUOTE] Science doesn't claim to know the answer to that question. But we're working on getting the answer to that (heard of the LHC?). Religion pretends to know the answer to that question while not addressing several questions itself.. (like what created the creator)
[QUOTE=garry;32375883]Using the Bible to prove that Jesus was the son of God is like using Lord Of The Rings to prove that elves exist.[/QUOTE] But a lot of people would argue that the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John would be truthful because they're basically eye-witness accounts of Jesus' life and the majority of the events that are described in them have been proven by historians to be true.
Religion is a way to control mass amount of people.
[QUOTE=Noble;32375915]Science doesn't claim to know the answer to that question. But we're working on getting the answer to that (heard of the LHC?). Religion pretends to know the answer to that question while not addressing several questions itself.. (like what created the creator)[/QUOTE] But, but, but...... God has always been and always will be. Humans are just to stupid to understand his amazing power!
[QUOTE=garry;32375903]You don't have to prove there isn't a God, there's no evidence for God. It works the other way around. You have to prove there is a God.[/QUOTE] Proving things is important, but how can you explain things like the creation of the universe?
This is just my opinion, but there's barely any logic behind religion, other than to comfort people knowing that in their hardships, they always have somewhere to go/they can always pray.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.