• Strange reason for newborns' positive pot test found
    16 replies, posted
[URL]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47814187/ns/health-health_care/#.T91KBbVSSSo[/URL] [QUOTE]Certain soaps used to wash babies shortly after birth may cause the baby to test positive for marijuana on some newborn screening tests, a new study suggests. In the study, urine samples that contained minute amounts of any of five baby soaps — Johnson & Johnson's Head-to-Toe Baby Wash, J&J Bedtime Bath, CVS Night-Time Baby Bath, Aveeno Soothing Relief Creamy Wash and Aveeno Wash Shampoo — gave a positive result on a drug screening test for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana. The researchers began their investigation after nurses at a North Carolina hospital reported an increase in the number of newborns testing positive for marijuana. The amount of soap in the urine needed to produce a positive test result was tiny, less than 0.1 milliliters, the researchers said. [B]It's important to note the soaps do not produce a "high," or any other effects of marijuana, in infants.[/B] "It's not marijuana a in any way, shape or form," said study researcher Catherine Hammett-Stabler, a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A screening test that indicates a baby has been exposed to marijuana can lead to the involvement of social services, and accusations of child abuse, the researchers said. Given these consequences, it's important for health-care providers and laboratory staffs to be aware that these soaps may lead to a positive test for marijuana, and to consider confirming positive tests with a more sensitive method, the researchers said. "We really did this to help protect families from being falsely accused" of drug use, and to help ensure that intervention efforts are directed to babies who are truly at risk of drug exposure, said study researcher Dr. Carl Seashore, a pediatrician in the newborn nursery at UNC Chapel Hill. Drug screening tests in hospitals that come back positive are not usually sent out to laboratories for additional conformation, because of the time and cost involved, said study researcher Catherine Hammett-Stabler, also of UNC Chapel Hill. Newborn screening for exposure to marijuana is common, and is especially recommended for babies born to women considered to be "high risk" for drug use, such as those who do not come in for prenatal care visits, Hammett-Stabler said. At UNC Chapel Hill, 10 to 40 percent of babies born in the hospital receive the test each month, Seashore said. Why the result? The researchers aren't sure why the baby soaps cause the marijuana screening test to come back positive. It could be that some of the compounds in the soap have a structure that is partly similar to THC, or it could be that chemicals in the soap change the way the test works, Hammett-Stabler said. The test is likely showing a positive result because some residual soap on the skin is washing off into the baby's urine sample, Hammett-Stabler said. When a more sensitive test was used on the urine samples containing the soap, the test came back negative, she said. Piece of the puzzle One positive test for marijuana exposure would not likely be enough to get social services involved with the parents, Seashore said. "It would only be one piece of the puzzle," Seashore said. Other factors would be taken into account, such as a history of substance abuse or lack of prenatal care, Seashore said. The UNC Chapel Hill now sends all positive newborn drug urine tests for conformation before any action is taken. The study, published in the June issue of the journal Clinical Biochemistry, also highlights the importance of collaboration and communication between different units of a hospital, the researchers said.[/QUOTE]
"No officer I swear it was the shampoo"
...
"officer, you've got to believe me, J&J isn't some weird slang or jargon for marijuana"
[QUOTE]"We really did this to help [b]protect families[/b] from being falsely accused" of drug use. said study researcher Dr. Carl Seashore. [/QUOTE] What the fuck man, I mean the intentions are fine but isn't this ridiculous? Test the high as fuck parents instead when they decide to have a baby.
[QUOTE=Jdeedler;36362582]What the fuck man, I mean the intentions are fine but isn't this ridiculous? Test the high as fuck parents instead when they decide to have a baby.[/QUOTE] Read the article. No one is high on anything, it's a soap used to wash the baby after they're born that for some reason is causing the babies to test positive for marijuana in health screenings.
[QUOTE=Jdeedler;36362582]What the fuck man, I mean the intentions are fine but isn't this ridiculous? Test the high as fuck parents instead when they decide to have a baby.[/QUOTE] Did you even read the article? This is to show that some soaps can cause a positive result, and is to stop families from being falsely accused of child abuse essentially.
Rate me dumb, but why do people test newborn on marijuana? Or they do an overall drug test?
Nevermind
I thought these babies did dope ass shit and were cool, but no, it was just SOAP. Damn wannabes.
[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;36364929]Rate me dumb, but why do people test newborn on marijuana? Or they do an overall drug test?[/QUOTE] It'll be a blanket blood test they run to try and pick up any health issues the kid might have.
[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;36364929]Rate me dumb, but why do people test newborn on marijuana? Or they do an overall drug test?[/QUOTE] It's mostly to test if they've been exposed to drugs by their parents Generally raising a newborn isn't something you can do stoned [editline]17th June 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Pierrewithahat;36365415]It'll be a blanket blood test they run to try and pick up any health issues the kid might have.[/QUOTE] This too
We have bath salts and now we have bath soap. This is getting silly
[QUOTE=Stormcharger;36365520]We have [b]bath[/b] salts and now we have [b]bath[/b] soap. This is getting silly[/QUOTE] I'VE FOUND THE COMMON DENOMINATOR, WE MUST DESTROY BATH PRODUCTS, [i]WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?[/i]
But there are people who live in the neighboring town of Bath, Maine, to think about!
[QUOTE=The Worm;36367273]But there are people who live in the neighboring town of Bath, Maine, to think about![/QUOTE]Kill them with fire.
[QUOTE=The Worm;36367273]But there are people who live in the neighboring town of Bath, Maine, to think about![/QUOTE] THEY'RE ENABLING THESE BATH FIENDS! ARREST THEM FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.