• German restaurant Flimé, opening in September, said to sell human meat.
    729 replies, posted
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461125] Prove what?[/QUOTE] Provide objective evidence for your unjustified views.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461125]Uhh, completely irrelevant. Rules has nothing to do with being an individual (unless you're an anarchist).[/quote] "You can be an individual as long as you don't act in a way that I don't like." [quote]Well considering you marked the post with "Gross", I'm guess it's yours too.[/quote] Not really.
Don't know if I'd dare to try eating man :tinfoil:
[QUOTE=Drasnus;24461152]Provide objective evidence for your unjustified views.[/QUOTE] Nah, I can't be bothered. Arguing on the internet is stupid, because you can always find evidence whether something is true or not. But I can go as far as this, and you can verify it yourself: [list][*] The Australian Government consistently takes action against a certain country which fishes for dolphins and whales - because they love the meat, Australia does not approve of them. [*] Cannibalism is illegal in many countries. In Germany, as part of a murder case, through precedent, it's become law that cannibalism is illegal. [*] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism#Recent_examples]This bullshit here[/url] shows that a majority recent cannibalism cases have been done by fucked up people. [*] It can be dangerous through diseases.[/list] [editline]11:09PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Paramud;24461164]"You can be an individual as long as you don't act in a way that I don't like."[/QUOTE] You're just a little fucked up. Why don't you secede? Form your own country and rules. [QUOTE=Paramud;24461164]Not really.[/QUOTE] Then why did you mark it as gross.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461244]Nah, I can't be bothered. Arguing on the internet is stupid, because you can always find evidence whether something is true or not.[/quote] "Sorry, I don't feel like arguing. Trust me, though, I'm right." [quote]You're just a little fucked up. Why don't you secede?[/quote] Should I list the reasons chronologically, or alphabetically? [quote]Form your own country and rules.[/quote] I've honestly thought about doing this. The thing is, to start any organization, you need a lot of people who agree with you to a large amount. [quote]Then why did you mark it as gross.[/QUOTE] Because there wasn't a "Delicious!" thread icon.
[QUOTE=Paramud;24461328]"Sorry, I don't feel like arguing. Trust me, though, I'm right."[/QUOTE] You got it in one. Well almost - the main reason being is nothing of what you're writing has any value. It's all rebuttle or asking for evidence, nothing of substance. [QUOTE=Paramud;24461328]Because there wasn't a "Delicious!" thread icon.[/QUOTE] Ah-mazing.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461244]Nah, I can't be bothered. Arguing on the internet is stupid, because you can always find evidence whether something is true or not. But I can go as far as this, and you can verify it yourself: [LIST] [*] The Australian Government consistently takes action against a certain country which fishes for dolphins and whales - because they love the meat, Australia does not approve of them. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]Irrelevant. [QUOTE] [LIST] [*] Cannibalism is illegal in many countries. In Germany, as part of a murder case, through precedent, it's become law that cannibalism is illegal. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]'People agree with us so we're right'. [QUOTE] [LIST] [*] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism#Recent_examples"]This bullshit here[/URL] shows that a majority recent cannibalism cases have been done by fucked up people. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]Those are also murderers who ate their victims. We're arguing about people donating their bodies to be eaten. [QUOTE] [LIST] [*] It can be dangerous through diseases. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]Irrelevant, it has nothing to do with morality. Fundamentalist Christians use the same argument to justify discrimination against homosexuals, "it just ain't right". What makes you any different? I suggest you read this first: [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arguments"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument[/URL]
Amazing, you just thew out any intelligence Drasnus. Australia is a western country. I pointed that out previously. Western countries rarely accept them as meat. 'People agree with us so we're right'. - Exactly, it's wrong according to the law, and breaking the law is morally wrong itself. In Germany someone donated their body to be ate, but the guy was put in prison for murder. That's how the law was set. And as for disease being irrelevant? Is it moral to roll around in shit? You can get sick through that. And that analogy is terrible.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461493]Amazing, you just thew out any intelligence Drasnus. Australia is a western country. I pointed that out previously. Western countries rarely accept them as meat. 'People agree with us so we're right'. - Exactly, it's wrong according to the law, and breaking the law is morally wrong itself. In Germany someone donated their body to be ate, but the guy was put in prison for murder. That's how the law was set. And as for disease being irrelevant? Is it moral to roll around in shit? You can get sick through that. And that analogy is terrible.[/QUOTE] You're officially a moron or a troll.
I hate to tell you, I'm neither - but a heck of a lot smarter than you.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461493]Amazing, you just thew out any intelligence Drasnus. Australia is a western country. I pointed that out previously. Western countries rarely accept them as meat.[/quote] A western country in the eastern half of the world. [quote]'People agree with us so we're right'. - Exactly, it's wrong according to the law, and breaking the law is morally wrong itself.[/quote] Bahahaha [img]http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/7047/1281681480782.jpg[/img] [quote]In Germany someone donated their body to be ate, but the guy was put in prison for murder. That's how the law was set.[/quote] It was murder because the guy was killed.
Testicle soup.. " WAITER! THERE'S A PENIS IN MY SOUP! "
[QUOTE=Paramud;24461555]A western country in the eastern half of the world.[/quote] Your point? [QUOTE=Paramud;24461555]It was murder because the guy was killed.[/QUOTE] But the guy consented to be killed and donated his body for the guy to eat. It resulted in the court denouncing cannibalism, therefore making cannibalism illegal.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461546]I hate to tell you, I'm neither - but a heck of a lot smarter than you.[/QUOTE] That'd only be possible if my IQ was -1. We're arguing philosophy here, induction doesn't cut it.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461587]But the guy consented to be killed and donated his body for the guy to eat. It resulted in the court denouncing cannibalism, therefore making cannibalism illegal.[/QUOTE] FYI this restaurant isn't killing people.
[QUOTE=Drasnus;24461594]That'd only be possible if my IQ was -1.[/QUOTE] Which it seems to be. Pretending that canibalism is okay is something only an un-educated fuckwit would do. [QUOTE=Drasnus;24461594]We're arguing philosophy here, induction doesn't cut it.[/quote] Clearly common sense doesn't cut it here. [editline]11:32PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Paramud;24461606]FYI this restaurant isn't killing people.[/QUOTE] No, but cannibalism is a crime... as a result of a cannibalist.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461621]No, but cannibalism is a crime... as a result of a cannibalist.[/QUOTE] "Making it illegal. Which is bad. And it's illegal because it's bad. There should be a stronger word for it, like, badwrong, or badong."
[QUOTE=Paramud;24461666]"Making it illegal. Which is bad. And it's illegal because it's bad. There should be a stronger word for it, like, badwrong, or badong."[/QUOTE] Breaking the law is almost always bad, however there are times when doing so is excusable. Are you denying this? Oh yeah, I forgot, you live by your own rules. FUCK THE POH-LICE
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461621]Which it seems to be. Pretending that canibalism is okay is something only an un-educated fuckwit would do. s a crime... as a result of a cannibalist.[/QUOTE] I'm through here. You're just... too stupid. Jesus Christ.
[QUOTE=Drasnus;24461696]I'm through here. You're just... too stupid. Jesus Christ.[/QUOTE] Good, one less cannibal-accepting idiot to argue with.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461681]Breaking the law is almost always bad, however there are times when doing so is excusable. Are you denying this? Oh yeah, I forgot, you live by your own rules. FUCK THE POH-LICE[/QUOTE] [img]http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/7462/fuckthepolicec.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461712]Good, one less cannibal-accepting idiot to argue with.[/QUOTE] Come on, man. All you really HAVE been doing is just saying that you believe an action is wrong because it's illegal, and it's illegal because it's wrong. Over and over.
[QUOTE=Ivebo;24461796]Come on, man. All you really HAVE been doing is just saying that you believe an action is wrong because it's illegal, and it's illegal because it's wrong. Over and over.[/QUOTE] Nah, only with the guy that just left - because he failed to understand the risks and taboo associated with cannibalism. I guess you didn't scroll up the page either.
I wonder if humans taste like chicken.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24461834]Nah, only with the guy that just left - because he failed to understand the risks and taboo associated with cannibalism. I guess you didn't scroll up the page either.[/QUOTE] If you can't tell no one is taking you seriously.
doggun you've used ad hominem arguments, strawman arguments, ad populum arguments and you've even tried to justify circular reasoning please shut the hell up
[QUOTE=Paramud;24462066]If you can't tell no one is taking you seriously.[/QUOTE] Couldn't care less, although: If you can't tell, you shouldn't take this restaurant seriously - since the whole thing is a stunt to produce talk about a new restaurant opening. ;) You'd have to be pretty damn fucked up to accept cannibalism. [editline]12:13AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Savaril;24462103]doggun you've used ad hominem arguments, strawman arguments, ad populum arguments and you've even tried to justify circular reasoning please shut the hell up[/QUOTE] Not a chance.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24462132]Couldn't care less, although: If you can't tell, you shouldn't take this restaurant seriously - since the whole thing is a stunt to produce talk about a new restaurant opening. ;) You'd have to be pretty damn fucked up to accept cannibalism.[/QUOTE] So, what are the risks from trying? Not trying to start up the argument again, just wondering what you think.
[QUOTE=DogGunn;24462132]You'd have to be pretty damn fucked up to accept cannibalism.[/QUOTE] Because it's illegal. Which makes it wrong. [B]I THINK I GET IT NOW[/b]
a [editline]12:17AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Paramud;24462319]Because it's illegal. Which makes it wrong. [B]I THINK I GET IT NOW[/b][/QUOTE] Yep, one reason why cannibalism is wrong. [QUOTE=Ivebo;24462304]So, what are the risks from trying? Not trying to start up the argument again, just wondering what you think.[/QUOTE] Look at what happened with madcow. Eating your own species is never a good idea.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.