The UN wants to form treaty to gain complete control over the Internet.
159 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;34805527]Every Assistance and Interim Force mission. Every humanitarian aid mission going on at this very second.
the United Nations is always at work.
[editline]21st February 2012[/editline]
No because your country isn't doing it.
[editline]21st February 2012[/editline]
I didn't know Ron Paul was a prominent anti ITU politician in Russia.[/QUOTE]
Congratulations, the UN is feeding hungry people so that justifies them taking ownership of a thing they have absolutely no right to. The UN is a joke, they can't do anything without sucking the Security Council's dick and they sure as shit can't stop a single fucking genocide or war, you know, the thing they were created to prevent. The United Nations is one of the largest failures in history for the simple fact that they fail at what they set out to accomplish, and they rely on NATO to pick up about all the slack.
The United Nations was not founded to keep control of things governments want, it was created because we looked at what Hitler had done and we said "Never again." The organization has become a corrupt hellhole where you could see planes crash into buildings outside of your fucking head office and then file paperwork, discuss it then bring it to a vote to figure out if you should offer help or just sit on your ass. The United Nations has failed so terribly since it's forming it has become a joke among people. Bangladesh, East Timor, Cambodia, Guatemala, Bosnia, Burundi, Rwanda, Sudan, Congo. Holy fuck, for an organization dedicated to the betterment of mankind they must put a larger priority on feeding a few people then upon saving the lives of those being slaughtered like cattle based on some trivial factor about their person. Didn't know owning the internet feel under that mandate.
The United Nations is always at work, just never working the job they are actually tasked with, trying to please the big 5 instead.
Want to learn more about how much of a failure the United Nations is? Read Shake Hands With The Devil, the commander of UN mission in Rwanda wrote about how at every request for troops he issued, he was constantly turned down.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;34806766]What about the money and aid in Libya?[/QUOTE]
Oh you mean the US supporting Gaddafi years before the revolution...?
All I wanted to do was be a gold member before the internet is taken over by the goverment
Fuck off and die now please government
I remember getting into an argument and telling the guy the UN would fall apart in our lifetime. He thought I was crazy.
I wonder if he will think that now?
I'll say it again: This is an op-ed by a guy from the American FCC, hardly a definitive statement regarding some 'UN Agenda'.
World leaders are really playing with fire these days...
Russia, hey, listen.
Listen, you too China.
I'd rather an non-profit organisation monitored by the U.N. control the internet than the U.N. having control over the Internet
That being said it couldn't hurt to move the ICANN headquarters the the international Zone in New York (even Geneva really) for the sake of transparency on an international scale, it being in California gives the US a bit too leverage than I would like.
For the dumbfucks who are saying that the UN is just sucking the US dick read this:
The United Nations HQ is located in an international zone within New York, this means that no country has the authority of who works there.
Secondly, the UN is only following the orders from the General Assembly/Security Council. These orders come from votes from the countries.
The Security Council was instated for good reasons, it is one of the vital things that prevent wars in the UN. Of course, a few of it's resolutions are total bullcrap but that is because of the veto right. The veto thing is stupid but it's the only thing that prevents wars. If all the countries in the UN went against Russia for example Russia would go batshit insane and go to war. This is the reason why the vetoing was in stated, to provide balance.
TL;DR: The UN is a good orginisation and it's not their fault BS reasons go through but it's the countries fault.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;34806030]It's funny. Only thing to be censored here in Denmark since ever is the Pirate Bay. EVERYTHING else seems to be up for grabs... Yeah well, cept for kid-fucking.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but the problem still remains that our gov still wanted to support ACTA, which makes me think they would assume a similar position of opinion concerning this. Especially considering the current state minister is incredibly corrupt, in the capitalistic way. (For all Dane's remember the Payment Circle "Betalings Cirklen" in Copenhagen? No wonder it was a scam.)
However, on the international scale: My biggest fear is that, not far from now, people have simply become too docile to even act, getting the general idea of "If I don't say shit, shit won't happen to me" which is exactly what an oppressive government want you to think.
Call me paranoid, call me a conspiracy nutter, but I deeply fear the world is becoming far too careless with the general "Meh, can't be bothered" attitude towards government corruption.
But then again, it's understandable: A good dog is rewarded, a bad dog gets put down..
[QUOTE=Zerohope;34815302]Yeah, but the problem still remains that our gov still wanted to support ACTA, which makes me think they would assume a similar position of opinion concerning this. Especially considering the current state minister is incredibly corrupt, in the capitalistic way. (For all Dane's remember the Payment Circle "Betalings Cirklen" in Copenhagen? No wonder it was a scam.)[/QUOTE]
There's an anti-ACTA protest at Israel's Plads on the 25th, hopefully that'll show our government that they're on thin ice with this whole ACTA-deal.
Instead of incessantly raging at the entire collective U.N., rage at the countries who are sponsoring this bill.
[QUOTE=Starpluck;34815370]Instead of incessantly raging at the entire collective U.N., rage at the countries who are sponsering this bill.[/QUOTE]
All of my [IMG]http://www.facepunch.com/fp/ratings/tick.png[/IMG]'s.
Some dystopian bullshit right there.
I wish governments would leave the internet alone.
Atleast they can´t censor my dreams.
[QUOTE=Coolboy;34815959]Atleast they can´t censor my dreams.[/QUOTE]
Don't give them ideas.
[QUOTE=Starpluck;34815370]Instead of incessantly raging at the entire collective U.N., rage at the countries who are sponsoring this bill.[/QUOTE]
You put too much credit in the intelligence of Facepunch.
[QUOTE=Joazzz;34816412]Don't give them ideas.[/QUOTE]
[I]"You can now purchase your dreams, directly from the iTunes store, for only 30$ per month!"[/I]
...Its an interesting sociological experiment to point out that not only did a lot of people jump onboard and believe it.
EVEN though the source is very questionable.
EVEN though its the fact that this must be pushed by multiple nations and the UN itself cannot actually push this.
So from what I've studied and seen. A large amount of facepunchers, by this test group, are willing and looking for any sort of conspiracy, idea of conspiracy or just the very notion of a large group gaining control of something they don't agree with.
Without evidence, without reputable sources, a majority jumped onto this without hesitation. Its an interesting sociology going on.
What the fuck man?
What the fuck?
Them UN representatives are way too old fashioned to successfully take over the internet. We must stand our ground and begin a revolution against these corporate dinosaurs.
I call bullshit on the SOPA bandwagon.
[QUOTE=Elfy;34819790]I call bullshit on the SOPA bandwagon.[/QUOTE]
Why you have a SOPA image as your profile picture then?
I personally like this image better. The holographic Earth makes it so much cooler than the one in the first Deus Ex.
How would that even be possible?
Russia and China shouldn't be allowed to even touch the internet.
running the world
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.