Windows is on 32 bit? How much RAM you have?
This is an error on Ram being too low.
[QUOTE=Iceboy15;47964547]Windows is on 32 bit? How much RAM you have?
This is an error on Ram being too low.[/QUOTE]
but I have a windows 64 bit... and I have 4gb memory sticks ( even though 3.75 of it is usable..) would that really make much of a difference ?
What is the contents of output_log.txt? (Should be in the crash report folder with the error.log)
[QUOTE]DynamicHeapAllocator out of memory - Could not get memory for large allocationCould not allocate memory: System out of memory![/QUOTE]
Hello there, my old friend, DynamicHeapAllocator OOM.
Your system is basically unable to run Rust at its current memory demands. 4GB is the minimum spec, but it's very much suffering from alpha performance issues at the moment, and really 8GB is the effective minimum unless you're lucky. This is [B]not[/B] the intended long-term or final experience, of course.
If you can, upgrade to 8GB of RAM, it'll improve your computer's overall performance, not just Rust. Just know that this is kind of normal right now but is not intended to be the way things will always be.
[editline]15th June 2015[/editline]
Your video card's also not that great for running Rust, although you'd probably be able to get away with running at lower to lowest settings once you're past the RAM problem one way or the other.
Without seeing your full specs, it seems like you're on a somewhat older machine that's just starting to fall into the shadows of obsolesence when it comes to running [I]new[/I] games, and so a whole-computer upgrade might be worth planning for in the somewhat-near future, simply because this kind of thing is only going to keep happening more often if you try and play new games that aren't small indie retro types (nothing wrong with those, but they often can be played on toasters).
[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;47975483]Hello there, my old friend, DynamicHeapAllocator OOM.
Your system is basically unable to run Rust at its current memory demands. 4GB is the minimum spec, but it's very much suffering from alpha performance issues at the moment, and really 8GB is the effective minimum unless you're lucky. This is [B]not[/B] the intended long-term or final experience, of course.
If you can, upgrade to 8GB of RAM, it'll improve your computer's overall performance, not just Rust. Just know that this is kind of normal right now but is not intended to be the way things will always be.
[editline]15th June 2015[/editline]
Your video card's also not that great for running Rust, although you'd probably be able to get away with running at lower to lowest settings once you're past the RAM problem one way or the other.
Without seeing your full specs, it seems like you're on a somewhat older machine that's just starting to fall into the shadows of obsolesence when it comes to running [I]new[/I] games, and so a whole-computer upgrade might be worth planning for in the somewhat-near future, simply because this kind of thing is only going to keep happening more often if you try and play new games that aren't small indie retro types (nothing wrong with those, but they often can be played on toasters).[/QUOTE]
The majority of it is old specs but I am able to play some modern games without suffering poor performance or lower quality like Xcom , but I understand
:Specs:
Intel Core 2 Quad
GTforce 730 (1gb)
4gb of Ram
CoolMax 400W
but I plan on upgrading it soon to much better stuff, on the bright side it has a wicked Alien Ware Case so endless room for upgrading right?
Intel stopped releasing Core 2 Quads in 2008, so there's that to think about. :v:
My old machine, before I built a new one last Fall, predates the Core 2 family entirely, good old Pentium D series from 2006. I know the feeling all too well.
[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;47976936]Intel stopped releasing Core 2 Quads in 2008, so there's that to think about. :v:
My old machine, before I built a new one last Fall, predates the Core 2 family entirely, good old Pentium D series from 2006. I know the feeling all too well.[/QUOTE]
Was it a good machine before you put it down for a better one? Plus I only have the build because some guy was willing to trade me it for my xbox one, regardless if it was a stupid trade or not I have no regrets...
It was a dual-core from the Intel generation just behind the very first Core 2 Duos, which meant it was still on the architecture Intel had been using since ~2000. It's still running as a server and is pretty problem free, but its glory days are definitely in the past.
It sounds stupid, but it worked for me.
Are you using a wireless headset? Try changing headsets or setting your sound output to default. It worked for me as soon as i switched headsets, very weird.
Na Xbox one is shit in a box. Good trade lol
(this thread is from june 2015...)
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
