Dev branch Vs Live Branch - is there any FPS difference for you? - Rust

Hey guys. Could you try the live branch and the dev branch and let us know whether you experience any difference?

Is this why there is a 200mb download on dev version?

[QUOTE=GavGod'sGift;43192492]Is this why there is a 200mb download on dev version?[/QUOTE] You think?

Is it worth the time? Has anyone noticed massive fps increases?

[QUOTE=garry;43192460]Hey guys. Could you try the live branch and the dev branch and let us know whether you experience any difference?[/QUOTE] I had no difference, checked it in 3 different spots inside and outside my house.

I cant start the game with Dev Branch anymore... 2 patchs today for it.. my steam stop respondig.. and i need to restart the pc

I would say the the fps on live an dev branch are a little bit laggy.But that is probably due to my laptop, since i don't have a desktop to figure the fps problem.

The Dev branch FPS acts up once and a great while but the overall FPS is better in Dev Branch for me.

Live works better for me.

[B]Dev Branch[/B] FPS Looking at the ground: 20 - 25 FPS Looking around: 12 - 17 [B]Normal Branch[/B] FPS Looking at the ground: 23 FPS Looking around: 17 - 19 (Taken on 15th December) [B]Computer Stuff[/B] Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate (64-Bit) Processor: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30 GHz (4 Cores) RAM: 12 Gig DirectX Version: 11 Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce GT 520 Screen Resolution in game: 1024 x 768, Windowed, Fastest Textures, Grass Off Hope this helps? EDIT: Screw you guys rating me funny for my crappy FPS/hardware :(

Seems to be the same 20-ish fps since the update running on Mac Os x 10.8.5.

Dev Branch FPS Looking at the ground: 40 - 50 FPS Looking around: 30 - 40 Normal Branch FPS Looking at the ground: 60 FPS Looking around: 50 - 55 (Taken on 15th December) Computer Stuff Operating System: Windows 7 Pro (64-Bit) Processor: AMD FX 6300 @3.5Ghz (6 Cores) RAM: 12 Gig DirectX Version: 11 Graphics Card: Radeon HD 6770 Screen Resolution in game: 1600x900 Fantastic Settings, grass.on false.

Benchmarks with Fraps benchmarks during 120sec run home A to home B and looking around with some animals [B]Dev Branch[/B] Time: 120000ms - Avg: 106.650 - Min: 59 - Max: 141 [B]Normal Branch[/B] Time: 120000ms - Avg: 111.167 - Min: 58 - Max: 184 without fraps benchmarks activated for the same way to go home A to home B never go under 90 fps dont see difference betwin dev and normal branch (Taken on 15th December) Computer Stuff Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate (64-Bit) Processor: Intel Core i5-3570K CPU @ 4.2 GHz RAM: 8 Gig Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 Screen Resolution in game: 1680 x 1050, Full texture, grass.on false

Wow, this game must be next-gen or something.

[QUOTE=MatheusMCardoso;43195627]Wow, this game must be next-gen or something.[/QUOTE] Or you know, in development?

The game is unplayable dev branch, the ground is a crazy white and some plants flash like crazy. also alot of item sprites do not work, like from what i could tell the flares did not look like flares it was a black box for the icon

framerate is great with dev branch as was with normal branch. no real difference for me FX 8320 @ 4.4ghz, 24GB DDR3 1333mhz, GTX660TI, Arch Linux x86_64 1920x1080, fantastic the mouse issue still there though (posted already on other thread):(

On the Dev Branch the performance is 30-35% worse here. AMD Phenom 2 X4 955 @ 3.2Ghz HD 7770 8 GB RAM Live version: 60-80 FPS Dev version: 40-55 FPS For me the Dev version is considered unplayable. I can't be competitive under 55-60 FPS. Being a PvPer is important to get smooth frames.

The one that was about maybe 2 weeks ago increased my fps by about 10-20 so that was good for this one there was no real increase in the FPS, it's been the same for me for this update.