Change a little, but not very good
[url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/a4476210bb8ca82ccb80c4cc.jpg[/url]
[editline]6th February 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;27894530]This is just terrible.[/QUOTE]
Sorry... My drawing ability is not very good
[QUOTE=call of duty;27894531]Change a little, but not very good
[url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/a4476210bb8ca82ccb80c4cc.jpg[/url]
[editline]6th February 2011[/editline]
Sorry... My drawing ability is not very good[/QUOTE]
You managed to make it even worse!
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;27894661]You managed to make it even worse![/QUOTE]
I feel very bad too，I can only apologize to answer you，sorry
He's either a troll or a retarded 10 year old.
I suspect both.
Oh god no.....just no.
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;27895701]He's either a troll or a retarded 10 year old.
I suspect both.[/QUOTE]
You can degrading me works , but you can't humiliate my personality, thank you
Name fits and I sense a lot of stupidity.
[QUOTE=Zeraxify;27892159]Why are they holding German weapons?[/QUOTE]Stole them from the corpses of German soldiers obviously.
name is call of duty
intelligence is exactly what i expected
picture quality is what i expected
low par
[QUOTE=Lebowski;27911000]name is call of duty
intelligence is exactly what i expected
picture quality is what i expected
low par[/QUOTE]
Many people aiming at my name is very antipathetic, but I don't know how to change it
[QUOTE=kamikaze470;27910343]Stole them from the corpses of German soldiers obviously.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that makes sense. Let's pick up and use random firearms we were never trained to use, that'll end well.
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;27918679]Yeah, that makes sense. Let's pick up and use random firearms we were never trained to use, that'll end well.[/QUOTE]
Some russian soldiers didn't even get guns at that time, they were handed a couple clips and assigned to a guy with a rifle. They either picked up that guy's rifle when he died, or an enemy troops rifle.
It's not hard to figure out how to fire a gun, basic knowledge of weaponry (which they would have) would allow them to know how to at least fire the damn thing.
It makes complete sense. :colbert:
[QUOTE=Lebowski;27919422]Some russian soldiers didn't even get guns at that time, they were handed a couple clips and assigned to a guy with a rifle. They either picked up that guy's rifle when he died, or an enemy troops rifle.
It's not hard to figure out how to fire a gun, basic knowledge of weaponry (which they would have) would allow them to know how to at least fire the damn thing.
It makes complete sense. :colbert:[/QUOTE]
Yes, but without proper training one may not know how to properly care for or even reload a gun. Plus there's the simple problem of ammo, which you could only acquire from dead enemies if it's ammo that isn't used by your country.
[QUOTE=CakeMaster7;27919538]Yes, but without proper training one may not know how to properly care for or even reload a gun. Plus there's the simple problem of ammo, which you could only acquire from dead enemies if it's ammo that isn't used by your country.[/QUOTE]
Pretty simple to figure out re-loading, but I figure if you're hoisting guns off of bodies in a battlefield, taking care of it isn't really a primary thought. They'd probably drop it once they ran out of ammo and pick up another one or something along those lines. Though I see what you mean, they're not exactly in battle.
[QUOTE=Lebowski;27919422]Some russian soldiers didn't even get guns at that time, they were handed a couple clips and assigned to a guy with a rifle. They either picked up that guy's rifle when he died, or an enemy troops rifle.[/QUOTE]
This is a complete myth, just so you know. It never happened during WWII.
There is a [I]chance[/I] it may have briefly during WWI due to logistical clusterfucks, but absolutely not during WWII.
[QUOTE=rossmum;27925188]This is a complete myth, just so you know. It never happened during WWII.
There is a [I]chance[/I] it may have briefly during WWI due to logistical clusterfucks, but absolutely not during WWII.[/QUOTE]
From what I know Russia was mass producing tanks and guns as fast as it could.
They were, which is why there are still millions upon millions of 91/30s in the world. At absolute worst there may have been the occasional localised shortage when a supply line was cut, but I doubt it since most troops would've been issued weapons already. The 'one man gets a rifle, the other gets ammo' thing is an imagination of Hollywood to add some drama to movies. The Soviets also pioneered combined arms warfare and had it down to a fine art by war's end, so the portrayal of them sending in unarmed troops with the NKVD literally right behind them with a machine gun is preposterous.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
