MY, EYES, bad posing, bad map, I don't see what you are doing.
Is that soldier holding a Taser?
construct
bad posing
horrificially bad weapons models
ridiculous lens flare
terrible lighting effects
gmod 9 watermark
i think you get my drift
unless this is some witty troll pose that went right over my head, in which case more power to you
[editline]01:27PM[/editline]
oh and terrible blood
Butthurter, why do you always say Indeed my child?
Betrayal is generally what traitors do. You shouldn't be so suprised.
[QUOTE=Butthurter;24814603]Indeed, my child.[/QUOTE]
Just stop it already, jeez.
[QUOTE=Butthurter;24814603]Indeed, my child.[/QUOTE]
That sounds like something I would say.
Yes, very yes.
:mmmsmug:
"Once again, the interesting title betrayed us."
The M4 looks like its floating
[img]http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs44/f/2009/108/6/2/failgif_by_OkamiJay.gif[/img]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Image macro" - PLing))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=rossmum;24815353]construct[/QUOTE]
This doesn't auto-disqualify [I]any[/I] pose. Just because it's construct doesn't mean it's bad to begin with. While his choice of map isn't the best, I didn't even realize it was construct for a moment. Most of the elements that give it away are less conspicuous than some nasty unedited, unzoomed garbage.
Lay off. He's new (or a troll, but I have never seen a troll pose anywhere near this edited).
[QUOTE]bad posing[/QUOTE]
I can't even tell exactly what's going on in the pose. What I can see is off but, again, is not [I]that[/I] terrible. Give the newbie a break and take a chill pill.
[QUOTE]horrificially bad weapons models[/QUOTE]
Model*
It's almost impossible to even see the M4 in any detail. Yes, it may be a CSS model, but I've seen a pose or two that used CSS models, and you could barely tell the detail level.
Grow up. You're just criticizing it because you [I]know[/I]it's a CSS model, not because you can actually see enough of it in any detail to actually judge that element of the pose.
[QUOTE]ridiculous lens flare[/QUOTE]
[I]So. What?[/I]
He's new. He's inexperienced. He's going to do things that aren't up to your deity standards. It doesn't even look that bad...
Go fap to your own work somewhere else, but don't take a dump on newbies just because they aren't your flawless masterpieces.
[QUOTE]terrible lighting effects[/QUOTE]
I don't see too much in the way of lighting effects.
Your argument is, in fact, invalid.
[QUOTE]gmod 9 watermark[/QUOTE]
The watermark is barely visible. You probably looked for it, and even then, it doesn't detract much from the screenshot. I only saw it because you mentioned it.
[QUOTE]terrible blood[/QUOTE]
Oh, look. You almost can't see the blood. It's actually a fairly realistic rendering, if you even know how bloodloss works or what color real blood is.
[QUOTE]i think you get my drift[/QUOTE]
Not really, no. All I've gathered is the same thing everyone else has to say about you: [I][B]You're an ass to everyone[/B][/I].
Since when has it been necessary for a beginner to be god-like at this like you? So far, all you've done is give harsh, discouraging criticism without any thought for how he can improve his work.
If I were in charge of this forum, I would have you IP banned for being such a moron to a newbie. You, sir, are [I]truly[/I] an idiot of the lowest class.
The posing definitely needs some work. The two things that strike me the most are
a) The floating weapon. It just seems to be there with nothing holding it.
b) The eyeballs are turned somewhere well somewhere.
And lastly - drop those lenseflares. They don't really look good.
oh look another worthless shitbag white knight who can't take criticism which isn't even directed at him
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]This doesn't auto-disqualify [I]any[/I] pose. Just because it's construct doesn't mean it's bad to begin with. While his choice of map isn't the best, I didn't even realize it was construct for a moment. Most of the elements that give it away are less conspicuous than some nasty unedited, unzoomed garbage.[/quote]
hahaha yeah sure thing, keep trying to defend it. i noticed it was construct immediately so either you're drunk, stoned, blind or stupid. construct is only good when it's scenebuilt, used ironically, or it's meant to be an 'ingame' pose. this fulfills none of those criteria.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Lay off. He's new (or a troll, but I have never seen a troll pose anywhere near this edited).[/quote]
sorry, but here in the real world, being new doesn't mean i'm going to suck him off for a bad pose. i'm going to give him exactly the same crit i'd give anyone else. if you think i should do otherwise, you are literally a cunt and holding him back.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]I can't even tell exactly what's going on in the pose. What I can see is off but, again, is not [I]that[/I] terrible. Give the newbie a break and take a chill pill.[/quote]
says the man who quotes my entire post line by line and gets all mad about it
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Model*
It's almost impossible to even see the M4 in any detail. Yes, it may be a CSS model, but I've seen a pose or two that used CSS models, and you could barely tell the detail level.[/quote]
hahahahaahahahahh holy fucking shit are you really that stupid? anyone with a working pair of eyes can see it in perfect detail, and it looks like rubbish. unless it's used at such a distance it's barely visible, it will always look bad, no matter what. the css models are rubbish. of course, you'll defend peoples' right to use them to the end of the earth, because we all know that people's feelings in the short term are more important than them getting the advice they need to actually improve their work. people like you are a wonderful breathing summary of everything that is wrong with political correctness, and the world would be a genuinely better place without you.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Grow up. You're just criticizing it because you [I]know[/I]it's a CSS model, not because you can actually see enough of it in any detail to actually judge that element of the pose.[/quote]
go get some glasses. i can see more than enough of it to say it looks like shit. perhaps the man (i use the term loosely) who quotes an entire post that's nearly a week old just to start another big white knight open season is the one who needs to grow up.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436][I]So. What?[/I]
He's new. He's inexperienced. He's going to do things that aren't up to your deity standards. It doesn't even look that bad...[/quote]
it looks horrible.
you know what? when i was new, i wish i had someone come in and tell me the cold, hard truth about my work - oh wait, they did, and look where it got me. apologist shitbirds like you help nobody. what in the fuck even gives you the right to show up and start white knighting on his behalf? did he ask for you to do so? most likely not, you're just so pathetic you'll look for any excuse to fight [i]those dirty elitists who dare to criticise peoples' work honestly in the hopes it'll help them improve[/i]. you are a literal child. congratulations.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Go fap to your own work somewhere else, but don't take a dump on newbies just because they aren't your flawless masterpieces.[/quote]
please do quote the post where i claim my own work is anything better than average. go on, do it. oh wait! you can't, because i don't actually consider myself all that good! welp, looks like you just lost that one, buddy.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]I don't see too much in the way of lighting effects.[/quote]
you don't see the huge fuckoff lens flare and photoshop spotlight effect that covers the entire image? jesus christ, see an optometrist. either you're blind, stupid, or a troll - i can't actually figure out which.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Your argument is, in fact, invalid.[/quote]
the irony of this should be lost on nobody
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]The watermark is barely visible. You probably looked for it, and even then, it doesn't detract much from the screenshot. I only saw it because you mentioned it.[/quote]
yes, every time i look at a screenshot ever, the first thing i do is look at the top right corner for a gmod 9 watermark. are you fucking serious?
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Oh, look. You almost can't see the blood. It's actually a fairly realistic rendering, if you even know how bloodloss works or what color real blood is.[/quote]
hahahahaha okay which movie are you accepting as 'real life', because you're arguing with a soldier who is working his way through some pretty heavy medical training with the possibility of going into forensics. i doubt you've ever seen blood aside from when you've given yourself papercuts or maybe when you slit your own wrists in the hopes someone will give you attention, you fuck.
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Not really, no. All I've gathered is the same thing everyone else has to say about you: [I][B]You're an ass to everyone[/B][/I].[/quote]
i'd rather be that than be a worthless retard who goes around being counter-productive and starting arguments for the sake of trying to be in with the cool kids like you!
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]Since when has it been necessary for a beginner to be god-like at this like you? So far, all you've done is give harsh, discouraging criticism without any thought for how he can improve his work.[/quote]
already covered this
[QUOTE=Sir Muffin;24930436]If I were in charge of this forum, I would have you IP banned for being such a moron to a newbie. You, sir, are [I]truly[/I] an idiot of the lowest class.[/QUOTE]
mmmmyes i truly am an idiot, nevermind that i duxed my school and am studying physics and medicine simultaneously. what are you studying? basic algebra? anime? kill yourself, you worthless white-knighting waste of semen.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
