Everyone who have played Garrys Mod knows what gm_construct is.
This is basicly my own version of it with a few less errors in the map, no offence to the makers of the original construct map.
The making of this map was brilliant making because the original map had so many small details i had to kind of keep since its a remake of the construct map.
Either way this map features:
*Water
*Dark / Garage room
*Color room without the popup on ur screen when entering it the first time.
*Two small boats in the lake ( these are not controlable from start since its Garrysmod u can make ur own control system)
there is more to the map than what I described here but writing it down will destroy the fun of exploring the map.
[url=http://www.garrysmod.org/downloads/?a=view&id=75678][img]http://www.garrysmod.org/img/?t=dll&id=75678[/img][/url]
And if anybody wonders, no im not trying to be selfish by naming it proudstruct after my username, i gave it that name because its to many using the original construct name.
very nice map, definitly worth the download. Gives a new look at Consturct.
oh boy another construct map. when will people make something original?
Construct was never original anyways, but this is nice, nicer than gm_construct infact.
[QUOTE=Legend286;16601482]Construct was never original anyways, but this is nice, nicer than gm_construct infact.[/QUOTE]
Not really, because he has fucked up the 3D-skybox.
[QUOTE=Foda;16601396]oh boy another construct map. when will people make something original?[/QUOTE]
Yes im aware of the >9000 construct copies but then again normally i dont post out maps who is remade from another persons map.
im sorry if it annoys you.
[editline]02:50PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Jukka K;16602077]Not really, because he has fucked up the 3D-skybox.[/QUOTE]
No i did not fuck it up i actaully removed because as most ppl know 3D skyboxes cause lag, and therefor i did not see any reason to keep it.
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16602107]No i did not fuck it up i actaully removed because as most ppl know 3D skyboxes cause lag, and therefor i did not see any reason to keep it.[/QUOTE]
There's no idea removing a 3D-skybox, it doesn't lag that much.
And if it lags you should buy a new computer.
Decompiling maps is never a good idea. I also see messed up cubemaps and a stretched skybox. Overall, not much work has been put into this.
I could do this in 30 minutes.
[QUOTE=Jukka K;16602252]There's no idea removing a 3D-skybox, it doesn't lag that much.
And if it lags you should buy a new computer.[/QUOTE]
Look I didnt really remove it I built the map from scratch
and what is the big deal with a 3D skybox, really
[editline]03:24PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Larry G;16602294]Decompiling maps is never a good idea. I also see messed up cubemaps and a stretched skybox. Overall, not much work has been put into this.
I could do this in 30 minutes.[/QUOTE]
I bet you could and FYI i never decompiled anything i took ALOT of measurements and built it from scratch and the skybox aint stretched if u ever downloaded it u would know...
And what is wrong with the cubemaps??
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16602477]and what is the big deal with a 3D skybox, really[/QUOTE]
:doh:
Without 3D-skybox the map looks like it's floating in air.
[QUOTE=Jukka K;16603077]:doh:
Without 3D-skybox the map looks like it hovering in the air.[/QUOTE]
alot of source maps do, look i removed it because i didnt want and if u want a 3d skybox u remake this WHOLE map and add it yourself.
PROBLEM SOLVED.
only ones on facepunch
:doh:
[QUOTE=Jimmy422;16591038]That's right on the money. The other problem is most people in this forum don't have a clue what a good map looks like, so they just keep getting praise for shit.
People, you need to look at maps at places like Interlopers and stuff. Look at these:
[img]http://www.albatros44.de/nuernberg/nnf.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i994.photobucket.com/albums/af66/researchanddevelopment/level_20000.jpg[/img]
These are good maps. They have detail, atmosphere, and proper lighting.
This, however, is facepunch quality mapping:
[img]http://s3.garrysmod.org/img/dl/75721_1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i671.photobucket.com/albums/vv79/leo230898/build_map0002.jpg[/img]
[media]http://youtube.com/watch?v=QPOrr6Xu4cc[/media]
See a difference? The first two took probably months to create, while the other two took what, 5 minutes?
But people will still say "Oh well so what the first two are a little prettier". So what? A pretty map makes thing easier on the eyes, more awesome, and more fun to play.
But whatever, most people here don't know a good map from a piece of dog shit anyways.[/QUOTE]
I know a proper map is awsome btw the first one there looks extremely detailed (nice)
and a map used alot of time on is best but look i made this map because I didnt like the original construct and i uploaded it because some friends of my told me it was pretty good.
and go ahead and find good reasons for why this map sucks or how horrible mapper u guys think I am but i uploaded it for the sake of fun.
*sigh*
Indeed, those maps shows the normal "quality" of facepunch mapping.
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16603458]I know a proper map is awsome btw the first one there looks extremely detailed (nice)
and a map used alot of time on is best but look i made this map because I didnt like the original construct and i uploaded it because some friends of my told me it was pretty good.
and go ahead and find good reasons for why this map sucks or how horrible mapper u guys think I am but i uploaded it for the sake of fun.
*sigh*[/QUOTE]
Protip: Never listen to friends. They're just telling you what you want to hear.
[QUOTE=Rixxz2;16603736]Protip: Never listen to friends. They're just telling you what you want to hear.[/QUOTE]
Ignored...
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16633191]Ignored...[/QUOTE]
These guys sound like they are berating you for the hell of it, but they are all mappers themselves. Listen to them, as they have a completely unbiased view of you and your mapping. You have talent, maybe you should try coming up with an original idea and going with that instead.
And if you are getting lag on gm_construct, you really need a new pc.
[QUOTE=IronPhoenix;16633996]These guys sound like they are berating you for the hell of it, but they are all mappers themselves. Listen to them, as they have a completely unbiased view of you and your mapping. You have talent, maybe you should try coming up with an original idea and going with that instead.
And if you are getting lag on gm_construct, you really need a new pc.[/QUOTE]
Hehe I aint getting any lag from construct but the thing is, I tried to make a LITTLE <-- (read twice) more detailed but still higher FPS.
btw thx for not being uhm douchy :P
and for any more readers who feel like finding a complain here's a little info...
The skybox is not stretched (Larry G download before making a statement no?)
The 3D-Skybox is REMOVED, not fucked up.
The map is not a designer heaven its a construct map.
The cubemap(s) is not fucked as i can see
And no i NEVER tried to be to be an selfish sly mapper naming a map after his username but I used my username in the name because way to many is already using the original name.
Oh, come on. Give him a break, I'm an experienced mapper myself and I don't see anything wrong with that map.
I get that feeling sometimes, that I just want to make something for fun, and he wanted to release it. So what?
Good work dude, you deserve it, now go out there and make a stunning map. Everyone can do it if they study hammer and put some effort into it :)
Looks alright for a beginner map.
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16634938]Hehe I aint getting any lag from construct but the thing is, I tried to make a LITTLE <-- (read twice) more detailed but still higher FPS.
btw thx for not being uhm douchy :P
and for any more readers who feel like finding a complain here's a little info...
[b]The skybox is not stretched (Larry G download before making a statement no?) [/b]
The 3D-Skybox is REMOVED, not fucked up.
The map is not a designer heaven its a construct map.
The cubemap(s) is not fucked as i can see
And no i NEVER tried to be to be an selfish sly mapper naming a map after his username but I used my username in the name because way to many is already using the original name.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i28.tinypic.com/2vugar6.jpg[/IMG]
Oh, but it [B]IS.[/B]
The lighting is also pretty bland.
And I really don't see what makes this different or better than gm_construct. It has all of its features, in the exact same places, with some actually removed.
So what's the point? Why make a pure remake of construct?
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16602107]
No i did not fuck it up i actaully removed because as most ppl know 3D skyboxes cause lag, and therefor i did not see any reason to keep it.[/QUOTE]
I removed the map's textures because as most people know textures cause lag, so I didn't see any reason to keep them. Wireframe FTW!!11!!
:downs:
[QUOTE=Rixxz2;16643308][IMG]http://i28.tinypic.com/2vugar6.jpg[/IMG]
Oh, but it [B]IS.[/B][/QUOTE]
That Skybox texure is like that ....
blame the makers of HL2 if u want but that aint my fault if you BELIEVE its stretched
sky_day01_04
[url]http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Sky_List[/url]
jeez
It looks alright to me, I have no idea how he could have stretched the skybox unless he actually modified the textures?
I do think that there's to many construct maps out there, so Proud Viking you got some talent there. Use it for something that's original. Tried mapping for L4D? It's quite challenging and will keep you busy for about a month to get the first map released :)
[QUOTE=CoLD_IcE;16649099]I do think that there's to many construct maps out there, so Proud Viking you got some talent there.[/QUOTE]
:suicide:
You think there aren't too many construct maps?
If something like 200 isn't enought, go ahead.
Ewwwww
It looks bland.
Try doing something original. Or something nicer-looking, not gm_construct edit #19283747757575
[QUOTE=Jukka K;16651696]:suicide:
You think there aren't too many construct maps?
If something like 200 isn't enought, go ahead.[/QUOTE]
Well, I meant that YES there are A LOT of construct maps out there, but I don't see the friggin' point in making this to a battlefield. Just comment nice instead.
Try to see it on the bright side and encourage him to not make a construct map and make something original, as I said earlier try an L4D map, It'll keep you occupied.
And yes, he shouldn't have released this one.
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16648720]That Skybox texure is like that ....
blame the makers of HL2 if u want but that aint my fault if you BELIEVE its stretched
sky_day01_04
[url]http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Sky_List[/url]
jeez[/QUOTE]
Add _hdr to the end of the skybox name. You don't need hdr for it to work, it's just an update in the orangebox that makes some textures stretch without it for some reason, don't know why really, but it works.
[QUOTE=Proud Viking;16648720]That Skybox texure is like that ....
blame the makers of HL2 if u want but that aint my fault if you BELIEVE its stretched
sky_day01_04
[url]http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Sky_List[/url]
jeez[/QUOTE]
/Facepalm.
Read articles like that more carefully in the future. It clearly tells you how to make the skybox un-stretched.
Add " _hdr " in the end.
Like this:
sky_day01_04_hdr
[editline]09:00AM[/editline]
Fuck. Rate me late.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
