Gm_Physbuild V2 *beta - Developers

This is Gm_physbuild 2 beta. I know it is not the best of maps but i believe i deserve " Constructive criticism" ;-I Please Actually play before you start judging it. I am quite new to mapping so if you have any tips i will appreciate them greatly. Anyway on to the map!! You can see a preview of the map here! [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6mt7ju7ZxM[/url] The map can be downloaded here [url]http://www.garrysmod.org/downloads/?a=view&id=85643[/url] I didnt make a post of V1 because it was my first official map and wasnt so great but since v2 is out now.. v1 preview - [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkPWSA80Pbg[/url] V1 download- [url]http://www.garrysmod.org/downloads/?a=view&id=85015[/url] Please comment and tell me what you think i hope you like my map.

Not to be a dick, but it seems really pointless...

[QUOTE=Da Fat Cat v3;18900985]Not to be a dick, but it seems really pointless...[/QUOTE] Ok then sorry i wanted to know peoples opinions of my map since thats so pointless.

That is my opinion. [editline]03:28AM[/editline] And it's very blocky and bland

The ground [highlight]IT HURTS[/highlight] :psypop:

Stick it up Try making it less blocky.

[QUOTE=wanksta11;18901171]Stick it up Try making it less blocky.[/QUOTE] Ok thanks i will try that once i get into learning how to level terrain and all that.

Very high quality map For 2007. Make it less blocky, tone down hdr, make it more interesting, add detail, make lighting more interesting, make it not snow inside, make it more realistic (no cubes of snow floating midair), etc, etc. Not bad for a beginner i guess.

This is what [B]I[/B] think of it, not what you are to judge of me. I think that it is quite bland with little purpose. My basic thought of this map is "Oh cool, a new mapper found out how to use func_physbox :downs:" I am proud that I am part of a developer community that attracts new mappers every year, but I think you might want to work on it a bit more before releasing something like this. Good luck.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6mt7ju7ZxM[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkPWSA80Pbg[/media] Media tags. [media ]URL[ /media] Works for pictures too. For future reference. :v: Oh, and yeah dude that ground could blind some one.

nice map, gunna try it out

[QUOTE=zelda dude;18916278]nice map, gunna try it out[/QUOTE] Thanks!!! The first actual good comment of it!

[QUOTE=duckboy38;18922626]Thanks!!! The first actual good comment of it![/QUOTE] It's better to get C&C though.

Its pretty blocky, and nothing is measured. Also if its snowing, try making some displacements. I liked the house when it fell down though :D

It's blocky, it's boring, sorry, but it sucks. Do you honestly think this is worthy of a release? Next time you finish a map, play it, look around and ask yourself; Would I be impressed if this was in an official valva game?

Nothing amazing. Btw snow has burned my eyes now I am blind. pay me compensation. Seriously snow is so bright. Also wow a snow. NO way I didn't know how snow looks.

[QUOTE=~ZOMG;18943340]It's blocky, it's boring, sorry, but it sucks. Do you honestly think this is worthy of a release? Next time you finish a map, play it, look around and ask yourself; Would I be impressed if this was in an official valva game?[/QUOTE] what is valva?

He meant Valve silly

Right here: [url]http://www.interlopers.net/tutorials/General_Half-Life_2[/url] is where you will find tutorials for almost anything. Start a new map and take a look at the architecture tuts, they are easy to follow and you will have a good looking map in no time. Because to be honest, that map didn't look good at all.

[QUOTE=Peanut117;18949969]Right here: [url]http://www.interlopers.net/tutorials/General_Half-Life_2[/url] is where you will find tutorials for almost anything. Start a new map and take a look at the architecture tuts, they are easy to follow and you will have a good looking map in no time. Because to be honest, that map didn't look good at all.[/QUOTE] Agreed, however, I also enjoy this site: [url]http://www.halfwit-2.com/?page=tutorials[/url] In all honesty I find what I need there more often than interlopers, but maybe that's just me. Interlopers is good too and does have things Halfwit doesn't.

I use both, I just found that there was a more general architectural venue.

Oh, well that's something I never needed help on. Not to sound condescending, it's just that it was really never a problem for me. Possibly why I get more use out of Halfwit.