What i think of supreme commander.....

[Mr.sandvitch]

so i got supreme commander, and ive been playing it for a while, and i still kinda adjusting to it from red alert 3. this is what i think of it, if you disagree thats your opinion.
all category's are out of 5.

First up is graphics, i give it a 4. the explosion effects where not so great (on the units). but, i liked it's death (the scorched shell left after it died), bomb and gun effects.

next is one of the biggest, gameplay.
I like this game's gameplay, its fast paced and requires more strategy, or more defence! there's upgrades, i don't know why but i love upgrades in a game. the building is very unique, to me at least. (i used to play ra3)
it uses beams to build, and engineers help build! a strategy i use is i use my older t1/t2 engies to assist. and a t3. i liked how many buildings there where to build, and i loved nukes/artillery. the defence was fun and simple, effects on them where good. i thought the commander thing was cool, like your in the battle field, it dies you die! i liked how you could customize it. the mods are nice, and cheating on? LOL i like to ai_freebuild and ai_instabuild, build lots of cannons and pwn em. so overall, gameplay gets a 4.

next is diffuculty.

Its pretty hard compared to the other rts games i've played. the ai is pretty smart! i love a good challenge. they like to rush alot, i hardly ever see any base defences, i have played a game of medium skirmish.

Difficulty, is decently hard. i give it a 4.

Last and Almost least, Strategy. (how much you have to use)

Unfortunately, no matter what you do, building a crap load of powerful units wins the game. but i dont like to do that. i use clever bomb strikes and attack squads. or something. it has very strategic buildings, and you have to consider upgrading to the next tier. so for strategy, i give it a 3.5

graphics: 4
gameplay: 4
Difficulty: 4
strategy: 3.5

My total score out of ten would have to be a 8.5

i enjoy the game, and i hope you enjoyed my review.

If you disagree, well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one. and i don't give 2 poops if you rate it a box.

[Angua]

Well you clearly didn't have graphics up so i say it should be 4, also 4 to gameplay and difficulty and well 4 strategy aswell though this is my opinion so.

[Kai-ryuu]

[quote]
graphics: 3
gameplay: 4
Difficulty: 4
strategy: 3.5

My total score out of ten would have to be a 8.5 [/quote]

what

[Parrrky]

all categories are out of 5

[editline]06:08PM[/editline]

even then, 6,8,8,7??

[Themage]

Is this supreme commander 1, FA or SC2?

[Mongol_God]

I really don't see how you can give an accurate rating of the game if you're only playing it against easy computer players.

[Mr.sandvitch]

keep in mind this is my opinion, and its fa.

[Trooth]

I'm so glad I now know Mr.sanditch's opinion on Supreme Commander

[Lowland]

How does a 7.3 turn into an 8.5?

Also, I have no idea whether this game is good or bad, all I know is I'm buying just one RTS this year, and it's going to be Starcraft2.

[Mr.sandvitch]

[QUOTE=Loofiloo;20745391]I'm so glad I now know Mr.sanditch's opinion on Supreme Commander[/QUOTE]

if you don't care then why did you bother looking?

[Sonic4Ever]

Decently hard? What about those [b]MOTHERFUCKING SENTRYGUNS?[/b]

[Mr.sandvitch]

[QUOTE=Sonic4Ever;20746338]Decently hard? What about those [b]MOTHERFUCKING SENTRYGUNS?[/b][/QUOTE]

its called large amouts of ground/air units. or a nuke.....

[editline]02:12PM[/editline]

[QUOTE=Angua;20743672]Well you clearly didn't have graphics up so i say it should be 4, also 4 to gameplay and difficulty and well 4 strategy aswell though this is my opinion so.[/QUOTE] you where right, i turned up the graphics and BAM! it looked beautiful. Thanks for the advice! =3

[editline]02:13PM[/editline]

[quote=sonic4ever;20746338]decently hard? What about those [b]motherfucking sentryguns?[/b][/quote]

need a sentry here! Need a dispencer here! Need a teleporta here!

Lol duble edit