pretty much, the game appears to be in beta (fuck it, i will clear this up a bit)
dod is a very good game. it can be very difficult,but every kill feels like a reward.
but honestly, it cant be that hard for them to update the game! all they need to do is
1: add mapping to every texture
edit: this is what mapping can do
[url]http://www.3dkingdoms.com/nmap.jpg[/url]
[url]http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Normal_Map[/url]
2: make it so that soldiers are entirely made of bodygroups (basicly, you will never see the same soldier twice (if you do, you wont remember the last time you saw him))
[url]http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Body_Groups[/url]
3: add a tf2 item system (so someone can have a mg34 instead of a mg42,nothing to radical)
4: possibly add more armys
IT CANT BE THAT HARD! this is a joke that they havent done anything
Not sure if troll.
Maybe its because they know it won't sell well, that genre is pretty stuffed full of CoD and Medal of Honour games, I don't think DoD:S even comes close to those
1) What? I don't understand.
2) Too much effort for a little visual difference.
3) WHAT!? NO!
4) Okay, this isn't as bad idea as the others. But why?
[QUOTE=PeeterCZ;23586543]1) What? I don't understand.
2) Too much effort for a little visual difference.
3) WHAT!? NO!
4) Okay, this isn't as bad idea as the others. But why?[/QUOTE]
I'm thinking the same.
Dods is not popular enough.
And not fun enough either.
Valve should add the British Army from DOD1.3
[QUOTE=PeeterCZ;23586543]1) What? I don't understand.
2) Too much effort for a little visual difference.
3) WHAT!? NO!
4) Okay, this isn't as bad idea as the others. But why?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=jack254;23586310]
1: add mapping to every texture
[/QUOTE]
Would take too much time
[QUOTE=jack254;23586310]
2: make it so that soldiers are entirely made of bodygroups (basicly, you will never see the same soldier twice (if you do, you wont remember the last time you saw him))
[/QUOTE]
Good idea, too much work again
[QUOTE=jack254;23586310]
3: add a tf2 item system (so someone can have a mg34 instead of a mg42,nothing to radical)
[/QUOTE]
TF2 is Valve's Sandbox for testing things, DOD is not.
[QUOTE=jack254;23586310]
4: possibly add more armys
[/QUOTE]
This is a good idea too, but again, it would require much work.
Valve would never do this because all of this would require so much work that it would not halt, but atleast delay even more of Valve's work
DoD is a bad game. Also, OP is not a troll, he's just a retard. I've seen him shitposting the L4D section.
[QUOTE=Happyfaic;23586811]Valve should add the British Army from DOD1.3[/QUOTE]
Probably won't happen, wait until Ham and Jam (look it up) is out.
Neat, thanks.
They are [I]always[/I] updating it, I remember in the summer of 2008 they added a new map to it! There was a free weekend and everything! :downs:
Same thing will happen as it did to CSS.
*Valve updates DoD:S*
"Waaah they changed it now it sucks"
[QUOTE=SteveUK;23587334]Probably won't happen, wait until Ham and Jam (look it up) is out.[/QUOTE]
That was in a book I read about British paratroopers.
He took my name! The OP took my name!
Also, i like DoD how it is, so no thankyou.
[QUOTE=Jacko245;23588393]He took my name! The OP took my name!
Also, i like DoD how it is, so no thankyou.[/QUOTE]
missing the o and 254 but otherwise, yes.
The only half-decent idea is # 4.
They should add the Japs and the Soviets and make the Americans fight the Japs and the Soviets fight the Nazis.
Yeah, it's basically what Cod:WaW was but Soviets + Americans vs Germans doesn't seem fair.
And no, it wouldn't be too difficult, seeing as it's Valve we are talking about.
Add mapping to every texture? What the fuck?
Soviet Team = Twice as large as German Team. Every Class is capped, except "Conscript", which has no gun, he has to find one in the field to use.
[QUOTE=~ZOMG;23587144]DoD is a bad game. Also, OP is not a troll, he's just a retard. I've seen him shitposting the L4D section.[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBPqksG9nbA[/media]
I think they should at least add bots to the game. Playing with bots can be more fun than playing with actual people.
The game is fairly old and it's not their most popular Source engine game.
[QUOTE=Billy Maize;23591789]I think they should at least add bots to the game. Playing with bots can be more fun than playing with actual people.[/QUOTE]
there are bots already.
DoD:S IS a very fun game, the only reason why Im not playing it often is anymore cuz the gameplay actually repeats and repeats and repeats. You have a selection of one weapon for every class there isnt much variation. They could atleast have added phong and specular shaders to the weapons, now they have such a nice engine and dont even use their abilities.
I really like playing Dod, but it seems that Dod is a lost cause for valve.
I personally think DoD:S could have been a huge hit for valve if they hadn't practically half-assed the original release. Source was such a let down for me after I had looked forward to something more awesome than the epicness that was 1.3 for so long.
[QUOTE=jack254;23586310]1: add mapping to every texture
[/QUOTE]
what does this even mean
I'm not gonna' say DOD:S is a bad game.
I am going to say it needs little/no changing.
yore smarate
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
