Medal of Honor (2010) - Just finished the game, any plans/rumors for a sequel? - Games

Hey guys, just finished MoH (the 2010 one). I have to say this game was good. I also loved the fact that the game was made for the honor of US military (probably). So I can't find anything on google yet, I'm still trying to see if Facepunch has anything, you guys always got some news. Any rumors? Plans? Anything?

I hope not. It was a pile of shit. I seriously doubt it too. EA's shares went down 6% on release day.

Ea says it sold 1.5 million copies [url]http://news.softpedia.com/news/Medal-of-Honor-Sold-1-5-Million-Copies-Says-EA-162154.shtml[/url] According to what EA said earlier, This isn`t enough for a sequel [url]http://www.joystiq.com/2010/09/09/medal-of-honor-must-sell-at-least-three-million-copies-for-seq/[/url] But probably they were holding the fans of the series ''hostage''

[QUOTE=Nextil;25679732]I hope not. It was a pile of shit. I seriously doubt it too. EA's shares went down 6% on release day.[/QUOTE] I think the game was above average, it was good enough. Why do you hate it? Because the game runs on the MW's engine? And I'm hoping the game will go above that number, after all the game got released not too much time ago.

Hopefully not.

Oh no I am talking about the single-player story continuing.

It was boring. TBH I liked MW2 campaign more, because it was fun. Even though it was unrealistic as hell. MOH on the other hand felt like "God when does this level end, Id like to do something fun now"

Well yes, it felt like MoH didn't have so much action. But it was better than some generic shooter, better than average, not good.

Soooo so short, when the game ended I was like "Whut did the game just end?" It felt like every thing you did in the game were just demos for what could have been cool games.

[QUOTE=Gvazdas;25679951]IBecause the game runs on the MW's engine?[/QUOTE] wat Where the fuck did you pull that piece of information from?

-mah merge-

there is gonna be a sequel guys

MOH 2010's singleplayer was incredibly buggy and basically had no story, you were thrown into random situations with characters you weren't with long enough to care about. Multiplayer was incredibly rushed and had poor gameplay balance, they only added recoil to the guns at the last minute and the effect was minuscule. You still die from out of nowhere from someone camping with a sniper rifle.

The above post, mostly says it all. Medal of Honor is worth buying only if you want to fill you collection corner with it, or Battlefield 3 beta thingy IMHO.

Maybe I was lucky, but I didn't notice a single bug in single player. I also liked single player a lot more then MW2's; I prefer a story I can believe, rather than one that is non-stopped "action".

My god was that campain boring. Just a million times moving up a hill and defending.

Medal of Honor sells about 1.5 mil copies BC2 sells over 3 mil copies I think EA is going to focus more on the Battlefield franchise for now, especially with how well Battlefield 3 is probably going to sell.

[QUOTE=DaMastez;25685169]Maybe I was lucky, but I didn't notice a single bug in single player. I also liked single player a lot more then MW2's; I prefer a story I can believe, rather than one that is non-stopped "action".[/QUOTE] No the sp was buggy, buggy as hell. It suffers from the "Can't clime up a small incline" syndrome that BC2 faced.

Well it's just okay-ish for me. It was too short and I thought it's gonna be better than MW2. It wasn't very well done like I hoped for. You just play as anyone randomly and I don't get the story much. And of course,it didn't have the special ops mission like MW2 to test your skills or play with your friends.So,IMO, MW2 is still better. But BC2 will still remain the best for me.