Crysis 2 just looks like it will play better, feel better, have better gameplay, look better etc.
You can't really compare them anyways.
[editline]09:19PM[/editline]
FO3 might last longer.
Crysis look so incredibly different to the first, and not in a good way. I'll know once I play it
System specs?
Get both.
I found FO3 kind of boring, played it for alot more hours than I did Crysis but those fewer hours in Crysis were way more entertaining. Thats the best argument I can give about games that aren't out yet.
In this thread i will say i can get any game mentioned.
crysis -> fps -> choose crysis
Crysis has too much graphics.
Crysis 2 if you can run it.
Crysis 2.
New Vegas.
fo:nv. the first crysis sucked, why should this one be any different?
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;23902876]fo:nv. the first crysis sucked, why should this one be any different?[/QUOTE]
i always thought the reason for crysis was to show off the tech, and nothing much else. The storyline sucked, tbh.
[QUOTE=MightyMax;23903206]i always thought the reason for crysis was to show off the tech, and nothing much else. The storyline sucked, tbh.[/QUOTE]
that's all it was, an over-glorified tech demo
i would get crysis 2, but thats because i love blowing shit up.
[QUOTE=Fosty99;23902314]Get both.[/QUOTE]
Crysis 2 is way better than Crysis.
It has been improved alot, the Nano-Suit for one is Awesome, Combined everything together and Multiplayer has classes aswell, so that's to be fun.
Crysis 2 was really meant for consoles (not nearly as good as a PC game) get Fallout New Vegas or Crysis 1
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.