Still fucking retarded, makes a bad name for Brothers in Arms to have a game like this under it. Like the last two Starship Troopers movies.
If they are going to go experimental, then why don't they make a game focusing on the German side as the protagonists for once? I'd like to see a game that showed the struggle and obstacles the Nazis had to go through during their multiple campaigns throughout the European countryside. An "All Quiet on the Western Front" for World War II, if you would.
Use a new IP as your test bed. Don't fuck up an amazing franchise
it's not the same story
it's not the same gameplay
it's not the same characters
it's not the same tone
it doesn't look like it will be cinematic
it's the same series?
[QUOTE=Leintharien;30346696]If they are going to go experimental, then why don't they make a game focusing on the German side as the protagonists for once? I'd like to see a game that showed the struggle and obstacles the Nazis had to go through during their multiple campaigns throughout the European countryside. An "All Quiet on the Western Front" for World War II, if you would.[/QUOTE]
Also it could make for a good story to play a soldier who becomes disillusioned with the third reich.
[QUOTE=Leintharien;30346696]If they are going to go experimental, then why don't they make a game focusing on the German side as the protagonists for once? I'd like to see a game that showed the struggle and obstacles the Nazis had to go through during their multiple campaigns throughout the European countryside. An "All Quiet on the Western Front" for World War II, if you would.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CertainDOOM;30347038]Also it could make for a good story to play a soldier who becomes disillusioned with the third reich.[/QUOTE]
Six posts and we already have a more original and interesting concept for a game than what Gearbox came up with.
why do these people have jobs again?.
Because they churn out sales.
I'm gonna quote myself here.
[QUOTE=Fish_poke;30323788]You can't bitch at a game because of the title. I played Red Steel and thought 'Ok, that was a good game.' and when I saw that Red Steel 2 was COMPLETELY different, I didn't bitch. I didn't moan. I took it as 'Oh hey, another game with that name that looks at least decent. I am ok with that.' THIS GAME LOOKS AT LEAST DECENT AND YOU ARE BITCHING ABOUT A FUCKING NAME. If they made a game COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than the first, second, or third [b]that had some relevance to the story[/b], yeah, there might be a fucking issue. But as it stands, this isn't related to the plot. So you can't bitch at it for having a name.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=imaguy;30346767]Use a new IP as your test bed. Don't fuck up an amazing franchise[/QUOTE]
I don't see how a spin-off can fuck up a series. If you decide your opinions on a series based on a spin-off then you're a moron anyways.
[QUOTE=Nikota;30352253]Because they churn out sales.[/QUOTE]
of at best, mediocre games.
the idea of making more sales because of the well known series works when your game at hand has any relation to the series aside from the name for fucks sake
[QUOTE=OutOfExile2;30352778]I don't see how a spin-off can fuck up a series. If you decide your opinions on a series based on a spin-off then you're a moron anyways.[/QUOTE]
The tone is completely different from the other games, so whats the point of adding those three words? All they're doing is alienating fans and confusing newcomers.
I could care less that they make this game, but it upsets me that this is the direction they seem to be taking this series in
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
