This long list is good, but I hope they fix the bug where they keep releasing the same game over and over.
Because obviously they didn't need quality control and only now they decided to work on fixing bugs and performance.
[QUOTE=RocketRacer;46574665]Because obviously they didn't need quality control and only now they decided to work on fixing bugs and performance.[/QUOTE]
QA is a waste of money when you can just let fans do all the work.
They should fix Ubisoft themself before patching they game if they cant beta test correctly.
Fairly soon, they'll have a working beta on their hands!
It has nothing to do with not properly testing or QA. You can only do so much with ridiculous deadlines pushed on you by the publishing side.
they really fucked up.
I've never seen this amount of bugs in a AAA game unless it was QA work.
[editline]26th November 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Cyan_Husky;46575209]It has nothing to do with not properly testing or QA. You can only do so much with ridiculous deadlines pushed on you by the publishing side.[/QUOTE]
This happens more than you people think. It's getting worse as well.
Sounds like they are actually trying to impress and make people think that Ubisoft is doing good with this patch but the issues shouldn't have been that numerous and massive in the first place.
At least they do something about their awesome game.
[QUOTE=RocketRacer;46574665]Because obviously they didn't need quality control and only now they decided to work on fixing bugs and performance.[/QUOTE]
EA pioneered the 'Let our consumers be our beta testers' and showed that it is a viable business model. Ubisoft is just following suit
I wonder how much they're punishing the people working in ubisoft
[QUOTE=TheTalon;46576523]EA pioneered the 'Let our consumers be our beta testers' and showed that it is a viable business model. Ubisoft is just following suit[/QUOTE]
Except they're skipping the step where they run a free beta and just ship a beta quality game.
[QUOTE=Dirty_Ape;46576618]Except they're skipping the step where they run a free beta and just ship a beta quality game.[/QUOTE]
They offered a beta with Crew. Unfortunately, with both of these publishers, the Beta is far too close to release for dick all to be done before shipping copies of the game. They're practically being printed while the Beta is ongoing. Battlefield 4 certainly was
[QUOTE=The golden;46577829]That's because "beta" is just a new buzzword for over-hyped time-limited demo.[/QUOTE]
That's brilliant, actually. If anything's bugged or not working they can simply say "Guys, it's a beta. Not yet finished." Now imagine if publishers did that with release copies. You could either sell them on Steam and call it early access. Or you could sell them in retail stores and call yourself Ubisoft.
300 bugs fixed in this patch hey? Wow, it'll be out of beta in no time at this rate.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;46576523]EA pioneered the 'Let our consumers be our beta testers' and showed that it is a viable business model. Ubisoft is just following suit[/QUOTE]
TBH I think Bethesda pioneered the "We'll fix it later" idea since every Elder Scrolls starts off extremely buggy until either the fans or Bethesda fixes it.
Usually it's the former.
[QUOTE=Durrsly;46579725]TBH I think Bethesda pioneered the "We'll fix it later" idea since every Elder Scrolls starts off extremely buggy until either the fans or Bethesda fixes it.
Usually it's the former.[/QUOTE]
Also, horse armor.
Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn you, Bethesdaaaaa!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.