[QUOTE=salty peanut v2;29878281]nobody used them
again[/QUOTE]
Like how nobody used media tags?
[QUOTE=d00msdaydan;29879195]Like how nobody used media tags?[/QUOTE]
Garry said they were over used
[QUOTE=asdfghjkl';29879200]Garry said they were over used[/QUOTE]
BECAUSE THEY WE USEFUL.
[QUOTE=asdfghjkl';29879200]Garry said they were over used[/QUOTE]
I've never seen them over used. I've seen them used for youtube, long pictures, and NSFW pictures.
[QUOTE=gbtygfvyg;29879228]I've never seen them over used. I've seen them used for youtube, long pictures, and NSFW pictures.[/QUOTE]
I didn't think so either
Probably bitching about bandwidth again.
because too many people who were into beastiality were using them
[QUOTE=Gabe Newell;29879259]because too many people who were into beastiality were using them[/QUOTE]
They were the only way to keep your photos from stretching the page, Gabe!
But the thing is, Groups weren't really used. At all.
[QUOTE=asdfghjkl';29879200]Garry said they were over used[/QUOTE]
FOR WHAT!? They were damn useful, is trying to force people's eyes to bleed now?
[img]http://i.imgur.com/I95BH.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Lambeth;29879308][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/I95BH.gif[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
No
Spell Gar[b]r[/b]y correctly next time then.
Groups were useless. But he shouldn't have gotten rid of media tags tbh.
Because they were shit and useless.
I MIGHT understand groups but the tags were to far.
Im not so much pissed about all the page-stetchers and shock/NSFW pictures, but now we have to click on links to go to another page to watch a 30 seconds youtube video? come on man, this isn't 4chan.