Warner reveal third Arkham game is due out this year Rocksteady not developing

[PCGamesN]

[url]http://www.pcgamesn.com/article/warner-reveal-third-arkham-game-due-out-year-rocksteady-not-developing[/url]

[Big Blue]

woo

[dgg]

Different developer?

Not good.

[Jaguar]

This worries me.

[Liem]

I will approach this with careful optimism.
If it can be half as good as the other two it will be a decent game

[ForDaNords]

Let's hope some Rocksteady employees are working for this other company.

[ZF911]

I hate how they want to make this a prequel [sp]just so they can use Joker some more. Don't get me wrong, I love Hamill's Joker, they just need a different character in the spotlight.[/sp]

[Riku2211]

Why does it seem so often that gamers can't have nice things? Why couldnt Rocksteady do it? Now it's going to be terrible, and the Arkham series, an amazing series, will go straight down the drain. Guess we'll just have to wait for the next decent IP that eventually happens when companies are done milking things.

[Liem]

I would love to see more on Penguin, or even Ra's Al Ghul

[GetBent]

[QUOTE=riku2211;39566892]Why does it seem so often that gamers can't have nice things? Why couldnt Rocksteady do it? Now it's going to be terrible, and the Arkham series, an amazing series, will go straight down the drain. Guess we'll just have to wait for the next decent IP that eventually happens when companies are done milking things.[/QUOTE]

It's the curse of the 3rd game of a trilogy.

[Maxjes]

No Rocksteady?

No Paul Dini?

This sounds terrible.

[dgg]

[QUOTE=riku2211;39566892]Why does it seem so often that gamers can't have nice things? Why couldnt Rocksteady do it? Now it's going to be terrible, and the Arkham series, an amazing series, will go straight down the drain. Guess we'll just have to wait for the next decent IP that eventually happens when companies are done milking things.[/QUOTE]

I think it's too early to announce it's downfall. It could still be good, it's just less likely.

The time between this release and City is the same as the time between City and Arkham, so that's a good sign in terms of time, but possibly a bad time in terms of schedule. (as in they may just push it to be done around the same time as the last one to keep a re-curring cycle of releases instead of trying to get it done when it's done and having an estimated date that may be pushed)

[Big Blue]

[QUOTE=riku2211;39566892]Why does it seem so often that gamers can't have nice things?[/QUOTE]

You didn't think the first two games were nice?