PCPartPicker: [url]http://ca.pcpartpicker.com/list/XjyNQV[/url]
CPU currently at 5GHz
Pictures:
[IMG]http://lonelywolf.me/ss/5GeU.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://lonelywolf.me/ss/2Z7H.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://lonelywolf.me/ss/6u1B.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE];3[/QUOTE]
We don't use faggot face around here
Anyhow, a 960 is kinda underkill for this.
I would've gone for the 8GB RX 480.
You should have bought a better GPU instead of blowing a $150 for water cooling just to gain a marginal increase in clock speed.
[QUOTE=chipsnapper2;50727732]We don't use faggot face around here
Anyhow, a 960 is kinda underkill for this.
I would've gone for the 8GB RX 480.[/QUOTE]
Yea I do see what you mean, but honestly I play CPU intensive games and find the CPU more useful for what I do on the PC atm, I had a gtx1080 but returned it as I found out I was blowing too much money on something I do not need, so for the money I got in credit for returning it I bought my case, the 960 and my watercooling
I mean the CPU is a pretty huge waste too. The FX series is so mature that there's no point in getting a 9 series over an 8 unless you're trying to hit world records with liquid nitrogen. Odds are for most CPU intensive games you'd be getting better performance with an i5 anyways.
[editline]17th July 2016[/editline]
SSD is a very questionable model and the PSU is meh quality and overkill as well. Just food for thought for you next build.
If you're doing something that requires high per-core performance (such as playing games), then AMD FX is not the way to go at all.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.