• Battleborn goes free-to-play
    7 replies, posted
[url]http://www.pcgamer.com/battleborn-goes-free-to-play[/url]
[QUOTE=RichyZ;52320347][media]https://twitter.com/DuvalMagic/status/781630229299142656[/media][/QUOTE] [t]http://i.imgur.com/RSTGnyg.png[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/kgO9rg8.png[/t]
[QUOTE=Clovis;52320567]Clickbait for a shit game. All time low at the news crew![/QUOTE] how is it clickbait the game is free to play. it is what it is. [editline]6th June 2017[/editline] i know pitchford wants to get around the stigma of calling it F2P but that's what it is...
325 000 owners, 110 peak concurrent players yesterday. Let's see how the charts will change after this announcement.
[QUOTE=AntonioR;52320916]325 000 owners, 110 peak concurrent players yesterday. Let's see how the charts will change after this announcement.[/QUOTE] even [URL="http://steamcharts.com/app/211420"]dark souls 1[/URL] currently has more than 4 times the players than battleborn right now, despite the games age and sequals that's pretty damn crazy [editline]6th June 2017[/editline] I mean, the game is very unique, but even then, despite its age and lack of updates its still consistently has more players than a game that depends solely on having a playerbase [editline]7th June 2017[/editline] [url]http://steamcharts.com/app/208090[/url] even loadout, an indie arena shooter has a higher all time peak than the AAA battleborn and before the battleborn-f2p announcement loadout was getting the same number of players about, despite the fact that the game is has been abandon-ware for a long time now, at least a few years. [url]http://steamcharts.com/app/275850[/url] no mans sky is more successful
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.