GOG would "definitely consider" Early Access - but not the way Steam are doing it

[PCGamesN]

[url]http://www.pcgamesn.com/gog-would-definitely-consider-early-access-not-way-steam-are-doing-it[/url]

[Pretty Obscure]

Has there even been an Early Access game that took people's money and then stopped working on the game like GOG makes it sound?

I feel like Valve wouldn't allow that to happen.

[Johnny Guitar]

I feel like that people that get their game on some sort of early access should be obligated to finish the game with a contract or something like that. The issue is, people can very easily fix a bunch of bugs and say it's ready for release.

[Coldmute]

[QUOTE=Pretty Obscure;44859052]Has there even been an Early Access game that took people's money and then stopped working on the game like GOG makes it sound?

I feel like Valve wouldn't allow that to happen.[/QUOTE]There have been games that have seen crap development, but a lot of people massively exaggerate just how bad it is, from just regular people like around here, to big names like Jim Sterling and TB.

[Sanjuaro]

[QUOTE=Pretty Obscure;44859052]Has there even been an Early Access game that took people's money and then stopped working on the game like GOG makes it sound?

I feel like Valve wouldn't allow that to happen.[/QUOTE]
Eternity's Child.

[mattmanlex]

[QUOTE=Pretty Obscure;44859052]Has there even been an Early Access game that took people's money and then stopped working on the game like GOG makes it sound?

I feel like Valve wouldn't allow that to happen.[/QUOTE]

Towns???

[inaba]

Early access kinda just feels like access to me.
If I can buy the game, like I would regularly, and still have it after it's "release," it feels more like I just bought it.

Counter Strike: Global Offensive felt like early access.