Because censoring people's eyes makes them impossible to recognise.
[QUOTE=Legend286;30468800]Because censoring people's eyes makes them impossible to recognise.[/QUOTE]
That wasn't the reason at all!
[QUOTE]As you can see, we’ve had to cover up the eyes of these booth babe babes, because we believe they would be just too SEXY for you to handle otherwise.[/QUOTE]
"RPS FEATURE Sexual Objectification Special!"
:v:
[img]http://i.cubeupload.com/xR7E8e.png[/img]
who is this guy?
[QUOTE=The Blue Scotti;30470462][img]http://i.cubeupload.com/xR7E8e.png[/img]
who is this guy?[/QUOTE]
:psypop:
[img]http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/images/11/june/booth/babe3.jpg[/img]
sums up e3
I was disappointed in RPS when I saw the article title. Then when I entered the thread to voice my discontent, I read the article and I laughed. Good show.
On another note: why do gaming journalists care so much about booth babes?
This is why I love RPS
[QUOTE=The Blue Scotti;30470462][img]http://i.cubeupload.com/xR7E8e.png[/img]
who is this guy?[/QUOTE]
A Trekkie!
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/04/GeordiLaForge.jpg/250px-GeordiLaForge.jpg[/img]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-Yh1m_m7XA[/media]
Roosterteeth showed them off better.
I came into this thread expecting barely covered skin and hot bodies covered with product placement.
I did not leave disappointed.
[editline]15th June 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=The Blue Scotti;30470462][img]http://i.cubeupload.com/xR7E8e.png[/img]
who is this guy?[/QUOTE]
gay ben
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.