I think it looks alright. I'm okay with a free, quality looking shooter with co-op and versus.
anyone remember this :v:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNXzmK9xRSY[/media]
"New Tactics!"
The player sets a mine.
Some top of the line tactical gameplay innovations right there
RPS is not going to stop harping on about that name are they?
But seriously though, I've been playing the beta when I can and it's actually pretty fun, in a lot of ways it's pretty generic but the co-op is fun, the weapon customization is nice, and it does do at least a few things to spice it up (non-regenerating health, climbing walls, sliding), it needs some work but it's overall a pretty fun game. It also looks and runs really well.
It looks kinda like Crysis 2, but with the futurey nanosuit stuff replaced with normal shooter stuff
If it's free to play then it doesn't seem like an actual factual bad idea, just kind of late to the party.
It's called Warface because Crytek has a bad imagination creating names that don't have "Cry" in it.
[QUOTE=RocketRacer;41919736]It's called Warface because Crytek has a bad imagination creating names that don't have "Cry" in it.[/QUOTE]
why the fuck
isn't it called Warcry
[QUOTE=TraderRager;41919836]why the fuck
isn't it called Warcry[/QUOTE]
How about Cryface - aptly named after what the average user is going to have very frequently
[QUOTE=TraderRager;41919836]why the fuck
isn't it called Warcry[/QUOTE]
Cry of War: Free-to-Play?
[editline]22nd August 2013[/editline]
War cries..
[QUOTE=RocketRacer;41919736]It's called Warface because Crytek has a bad imagination creating names that don't have "Cry" in it.[/QUOTE]
Cryface?
Even if this Modern Warcry is a good game... the fps market is so saturated with shit that it's still going to disappear into oblivion after 15 minutes anyway.
I sense a lot of mic spamming of Sgt. Hartman and other Full Metal Jacket quotes when the game comes out.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.