just what [b]battlefield[/b] needed. CQC. wait.. i think there's another game that does it way better.
[QUOTE=s3xt0y;35725448]just what [b]battlefield[/b] needed. CQC. wait.. i think there's another game that does it way better.[/QUOTE]
So all because COD does CQC, that means Battlefield isn't allowed to?
Maps look okay but I'll mainly be getting the map pack for the new weapons.
[QUOTE=Delta616;35725471]So all because COD does CQC, that means Battlefield isn't allowed to?[/QUOTE]
CQC isn't exactly BF3's strong point. Go play a 64 player Metro server.
[QUOTE=BigSmokeDawg;35725657]CQC isn't exactly BF3's strong point. Go play a 64 player Metro server.[/QUOTE]
Hmmmm lets think that one through. Was Operation Metro designed for 64 player? Neither is the Close Quarters expansion pack.
[QUOTE=BigSmokeDawg;35725657]CQC isn't exactly BF3's strong point. Go play a 64 player Metro server.[/QUOTE]
Actually.. On hardcore mode 64 player Metro isn't that bad as long as the people you are playing with are semi-competent. It's only on softcore that I've noticed whoever gets B basically wins the game. During harcore there's always a tug-of-war feeling, sometimes we push past B and sometimes we get pushed back, but the battle never stops at B.
All because BF3 on the PC features 64 player Conquest, does not mean every single map they release for the game will be suited for 64 player matches!
[QUOTE=Delta616;35725807]All because BF3 on the PC features 64 player Conquest, does not mean every single map they release for the game will be suited for 64 player matches![/QUOTE]
Thanks Delta.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.